Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Psychometric evaluation of the Czech Beck Depression Inventory-II in a sample of depressed patients and healthy controls

M. Ociskova, J. Prasko, M. Kupka, M. Marackova, K. Latalova, A. Cinculova, A. Grambal, P. Kasalova, B. Krnacova, R. Kubinek, Z. Sigmundova, A. Tichackova, K. Vrbova,

. 2017 ; 38 (2) : 98-106.

Jazyk angličtina Země Švédsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024899

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore reliability and validity of the Czech revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and to identify the best cut-off for a correct identification of a potentially depressed individual. METHOD: Two groups of adult participants entered the study. The first group consisted of 177 patients with depression (F32x or F33x according to the ICD-10). Furthermore, there were 767 healthy controls. Each participant filled in BDI-II. A part of the patients also completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), and the subjective Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). A part of the controls filled in the Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). RESULT: The average patients' BDI-II score was 30.8±10.3, the mean controls' score was 7.2±6.8. The internal consistency of the inventory was excellent (the ordinal alpha coefficient was 0.90 for the patients and 0.93 for the controls). The stability in time, measured two weeks apart, was also good (intra-class correlation coefficient r=0.83 for the patients and 0.77 for the controls). The exploratory factor analysis of the patients showed a three-factor solution, while the analysis of the controls' data identified two factors. As expected, BDI-II significantly positively correlated with BAI, DES, and CGI and was negatively connected to ADHS and SWLS. The cut-off score with the best sensitivity and specificity was 17. CONCLUSION: The Czech BDI-II shows adequate psychometric characteristics.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024899
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180710100147.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 sw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)28650603
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sw
100    1_
$a Ociskova, Marie $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Psychometric evaluation of the Czech Beck Depression Inventory-II in a sample of depressed patients and healthy controls / $c M. Ociskova, J. Prasko, M. Kupka, M. Marackova, K. Latalova, A. Cinculova, A. Grambal, P. Kasalova, B. Krnacova, R. Kubinek, Z. Sigmundova, A. Tichackova, K. Vrbova,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore reliability and validity of the Czech revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and to identify the best cut-off for a correct identification of a potentially depressed individual. METHOD: Two groups of adult participants entered the study. The first group consisted of 177 patients with depression (F32x or F33x according to the ICD-10). Furthermore, there were 767 healthy controls. Each participant filled in BDI-II. A part of the patients also completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), and the subjective Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). A part of the controls filled in the Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). RESULT: The average patients' BDI-II score was 30.8±10.3, the mean controls' score was 7.2±6.8. The internal consistency of the inventory was excellent (the ordinal alpha coefficient was 0.90 for the patients and 0.93 for the controls). The stability in time, measured two weeks apart, was also good (intra-class correlation coefficient r=0.83 for the patients and 0.77 for the controls). The exploratory factor analysis of the patients showed a three-factor solution, while the analysis of the controls' data identified two factors. As expected, BDI-II significantly positively correlated with BAI, DES, and CGI and was negatively connected to ADHS and SWLS. The cut-off score with the best sensitivity and specificity was 17. CONCLUSION: The Czech BDI-II shows adequate psychometric characteristics.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
650    _2
$a deprese $x diagnóza $7 D003863
650    _2
$a depresivní poruchy $x diagnóza $7 D003866
650    _2
$a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a osobní uspokojení $7 D010549
650    12
$a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
650    _2
$a psychometrie $7 D011594
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a překlady $7 D014177
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a validační studie $7 D023361
700    1_
$a Prasko, Jan $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kupka, Martin $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Marackova, Marketa $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Latalova, Klara $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cinculova, Andrea $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Grambal, Ales $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kasalova, Petra $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krnacova, Barbora $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kubinek, Radim $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sigmundova, Zuzana $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tichackova, Anezka $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vrbova, Kristyna $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00168352 $t Neuro endocrinology letters $x 0172-780X $g Roč. 38, č. 2 (2017), s. 98-106
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28650603 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180710100437 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1317030 $s 1021820
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 38 $c 2 $d 98-106 $i 0172-780X $m Neuro-endocrinology letters $n Neuro-endocrinol. lett. $x MED00168352
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...