-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Psychometric evaluation of the Czech Beck Depression Inventory-II in a sample of depressed patients and healthy controls
M. Ociskova, J. Prasko, M. Kupka, M. Marackova, K. Latalova, A. Cinculova, A. Grambal, P. Kasalova, B. Krnacova, R. Kubinek, Z. Sigmundova, A. Tichackova, K. Vrbova,
Jazyk angličtina Země Švédsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, validační studie
- MeSH
- deprese diagnóza MeSH
- depresivní poruchy diagnóza MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- faktorová analýza statistická MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- osobní uspokojení * MeSH
- překlady MeSH
- psychiatrické posuzovací škály * MeSH
- psychometrie MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore reliability and validity of the Czech revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and to identify the best cut-off for a correct identification of a potentially depressed individual. METHOD: Two groups of adult participants entered the study. The first group consisted of 177 patients with depression (F32x or F33x according to the ICD-10). Furthermore, there were 767 healthy controls. Each participant filled in BDI-II. A part of the patients also completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), and the subjective Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). A part of the controls filled in the Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). RESULT: The average patients' BDI-II score was 30.8±10.3, the mean controls' score was 7.2±6.8. The internal consistency of the inventory was excellent (the ordinal alpha coefficient was 0.90 for the patients and 0.93 for the controls). The stability in time, measured two weeks apart, was also good (intra-class correlation coefficient r=0.83 for the patients and 0.77 for the controls). The exploratory factor analysis of the patients showed a three-factor solution, while the analysis of the controls' data identified two factors. As expected, BDI-II significantly positively correlated with BAI, DES, and CGI and was negatively connected to ADHS and SWLS. The cut-off score with the best sensitivity and specificity was 17. CONCLUSION: The Czech BDI-II shows adequate psychometric characteristics.
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18024899
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180710100147.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2017 sw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28650603
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sw
- 100 1_
- $a Ociskova, Marie $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Psychometric evaluation of the Czech Beck Depression Inventory-II in a sample of depressed patients and healthy controls / $c M. Ociskova, J. Prasko, M. Kupka, M. Marackova, K. Latalova, A. Cinculova, A. Grambal, P. Kasalova, B. Krnacova, R. Kubinek, Z. Sigmundova, A. Tichackova, K. Vrbova,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to explore reliability and validity of the Czech revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and to identify the best cut-off for a correct identification of a potentially depressed individual. METHOD: Two groups of adult participants entered the study. The first group consisted of 177 patients with depression (F32x or F33x according to the ICD-10). Furthermore, there were 767 healthy controls. Each participant filled in BDI-II. A part of the patients also completed the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES), and the subjective Clinical Global Impression scale (CGI). A part of the controls filled in the Adult Dispositional Hope Scale (ADHS) and the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). RESULT: The average patients' BDI-II score was 30.8±10.3, the mean controls' score was 7.2±6.8. The internal consistency of the inventory was excellent (the ordinal alpha coefficient was 0.90 for the patients and 0.93 for the controls). The stability in time, measured two weeks apart, was also good (intra-class correlation coefficient r=0.83 for the patients and 0.77 for the controls). The exploratory factor analysis of the patients showed a three-factor solution, while the analysis of the controls' data identified two factors. As expected, BDI-II significantly positively correlated with BAI, DES, and CGI and was negatively connected to ADHS and SWLS. The cut-off score with the best sensitivity and specificity was 17. CONCLUSION: The Czech BDI-II shows adequate psychometric characteristics.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 650 _2
- $a deprese $x diagnóza $7 D003863
- 650 _2
- $a depresivní poruchy $x diagnóza $7 D003866
- 650 _2
- $a faktorová analýza statistická $7 D005163
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 12
- $a osobní uspokojení $7 D010549
- 650 12
- $a psychiatrické posuzovací škály $7 D011569
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $7 D011594
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a překlady $7 D014177
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a validační studie $7 D023361
- 700 1_
- $a Prasko, Jan $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kupka, Martin $u Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Marackova, Marketa $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Latalova, Klara $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cinculova, Andrea $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Grambal, Ales $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kasalova, Petra $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Krnacova, Barbora $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kubinek, Radim $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sigmundova, Zuzana $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tichackova, Anezka $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vrbova, Kristyna $u Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00168352 $t Neuro endocrinology letters $x 0172-780X $g Roč. 38, č. 2 (2017), s. 98-106
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28650603 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180710100437 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317030 $s 1021820
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 38 $c 2 $d 98-106 $i 0172-780X $m Neuro-endocrinology letters $n Neuro-endocrinol. lett. $x MED00168352
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709