Consistency in recognizing microinvasion in breast carcinomas is improved by immunohistochemistry for myoepithelial markers
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
26818833
DOI
10.1007/s00428-016-1909-x
PII: 10.1007/s00428-016-1909-x
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Immunohistochemistry, In situ carcinoma, Microinvasion, Myoepithelium, Reproducibility,
- MeSH
- imunohistochemie metody MeSH
- karcinom patologie MeSH
- laboratorní medicína metody normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metastázy nádorů diagnóza MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery analýza MeSH
- nádory prsu patologie MeSH
- odchylka pozorovatele MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- nádorové biomarkery MeSH
Microinvasion is the smallest morphologically identifiable stage of invasion. Its presence and distinction from in situ carcinoma may have therapeutic implications, and clinical staging also requires the recognition of this phenomenon. Microinvasion is established on the basis of several morphological criteria, which may be difficult and not perfectly reproducible among pathologists. The aim of this study was to assess the consistency of diagnosing microinvasion in the breast on traditional haematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained slides and to evaluate whether immunohistochemistry (IHC) for myoepithelial markers could improve this. Digital images were generated from representative areas of 50 cases stained with HE and IHC for myoepithelial markers. Cases were specifically selected from the spectrum of in situ to microinvasive cancers. Twenty-eight dedicated breast pathologists assessed these cases at different magnifications through a web-based platform in two rounds: first HE only and after a washout period by both HE and IHC. Consistency in the recognition of microinvasion significantly improved with the use of IHC. Concordance rates increased from 0.85 to 0.96, kappa from 0.5 to 0.85, the number of cases with 100% agreement rose from 9/50 to 25/50 with IHC and the certainty of diagnosis also increased. The use of IHC markedly improves the consistency of identifying microinvasion. This corroborates previous recommendations to use IHC for myoepithelial markers to clarify cases where uncertainty exists about the presence of microinvasion. Microinvasive carcinoma is a rare entity, and seeking a second opinion may avoid overdiagnosis.
2nd Department of Pathology Semmelweis University Budapest Üllői út 93 Budapest 1091 Hungary
Aix Marseille Université 13284 Marseille France
Bács Kiskun County Teaching Hospital Nyiri ut 38 Kecskemét 6000 Hungary
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique UMR7258 13009 Marseille France
CMP Cerba European Labs 45A avenue Wybran 1070 Brussels Belgium
CRCM Molecular Oncology Equipe labellisée Ligue Contre le Cancer Inserm U1068 13009 Marseille France
Department of Histopathology St Vincent's University Hospital Dublin 4 Dublin Ireland
Department of Medical Sciences University of Torino Italy Via Santena 7 10120 Torino Italy
Department of Pathology Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra Irunlarrea 3 31008 Pamplona Navarra Spain
Department of Pathology Mater Dei Hospital Tal Qroqq Msida MSD 2090 Malta
Department of Pathology Medical School University of Patras 26504 Patras Rion Greece
Department of Pathology University Hospitals Leuven Herestraat 49 3000 Leuven Belgium
Department of Pathology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Pathology University of Szeged Allomás u 2 Szeged 6720 Hungary
Discipline of Pathology NUI Galway Clinical Sciences Institute Costello Road Galway Ireland
Institut Paoli Calmettes 13009 Marseille France
Institute of Pathology Breast Cancer Center Paderborn Husener Str 46a 33098 Paderborn Germany
Institute of Pathology Medical University Graz Auenbruggerplatz 25 8036 Graz Austria
Laboratório de Anatomia Patológica Centro Hospitalar de São João e IPATIMUP 4440 563 Porto Portugal
Pathologisch Bakteriologisches Institut Donauspital am SMZO Langobardenstraße 122 Vienna Austria
Pathology Centre Riga East Clinical University Hospital Hipokrata St 2 Riga LV 1038 Latvia
School of Medicine Department of Pathology Marmara University Istanbul Turkey
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2010 Jun;34(6):896-900 PubMed
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Feb;33(2):227-32 PubMed
Virchows Arch. 1999 Mar;434(3):227-34 PubMed
Anticancer Res. 1997 Nov-Dec;17(6D):4443-9 PubMed
Breast Care (Basel). 2008;3(6):423-425 PubMed
APMIS. 2012 Mar;120(3):249-52 PubMed
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan;40(1):5-11 PubMed
Diagn Pathol. 2014 Jun 19;9:121 PubMed
Pathobiology. 2015 Sep;82(3-4):166-71 PubMed
Hum Pathol. 2002 Mar;33(3):365-71 PubMed
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Feb;59(2):130-7 PubMed
Pathol Oncol Res. 2008 Jun;14(2):105-11 PubMed
Mod Pathol. 2014 Nov;27(11):1489-98 PubMed
Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 PubMed
Cancer Res. 1982 Nov;42(11):4763-70 PubMed
J Clin Pathol. 2006 Feb;59(2):138-45 PubMed