Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

DIEP flap breast reconstruction - new experience

J. Veselý, I. Stupka, L. Dražan

. 2001 ; Roč. 43 (č. 1) : s. 3-6.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Digital library NLK
Issue
Volume
Source
Source

E-resources Online

One of the important microsurgical procedures in our department is breast reconstruction after ablations. For many years, the standard method was reconstruction with autologous tissues – a free TRAM flap with a recipient vessels vasa mammaria. We are convinced that this give very satisfactory results with microsurgical safety of op- erations. We use this method of reconstruction in 17–20 patients per year. The standard time of unilateral recon- struction is 2.5–4 hours, of bilateral reconstruction 4–6 hours. Postoperative morbidity in the abdominal region is, as a rule, associated with a weakening of the abdominal wall and the development of hernias (Galli et al., 1992); a perforator flap in which neither muscle nor fasciae are used creates the prerequisite condition for markedly reduced the morbidity associated with the site of flap collection. Although we used a perforator flap three times for reconstructions of the extremities as early as three years ago, we began to use it for breast reconstruction from the beginning of 2000. No doubt this late use of a large skin flap supplied by 1–2 perforators was due to a lack of trust in the provision of adequate blood perfusion for the large amount of tissue of the flap. From the beginning of 2000, in the course of five months, nine DIEP flaps were used for breast reconstructions, in two cases for bilateral reconstruction. In two instances sensory nerves of the flap were sutured to the branch of the intercostal nerves at the site of insertion. Seven flaps healed p.p.i; in two instances we were faced with the complication of postoperative venostasis, calling for revision and connection of the superficial venous system of the flap to the circulation. Subsequent healing was without complications. Preparation of the flap appears to be relatively easy, and the only pitfall is the selection of a suitable perforator. The operation is longer by half an hour than the classical free TRAM; when the sensory nerve of the flap is sutured, it is ca 1 hour longer. We like to use the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction, and it is a reliable method even for the reconstruction of large pendulous breasts. The donor site morbidity is significantly lower.

Bibliography, etc.

Lit: 7

Bibliography, etc.

Souhrn: decs

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc01009586
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130725143422.0
008      
010600s2001 xr u eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng $b ger $b cze
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Veselý, Jiří, $d 1953- $4 aut $7 jn20000402519
245    10
$a DIEP flap breast reconstruction - new experience / $c J. Veselý, I. Stupka, L. Dražan
314    __
$a Clinic of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Ann University Hospital, Brno, CZ
504    __
$a Lit: 7
504    __
$a Souhrn: decs
520    9_
$a One of the important microsurgical procedures in our department is breast reconstruction after ablations. For many years, the standard method was reconstruction with autologous tissues – a free TRAM flap with a recipient vessels vasa mammaria. We are convinced that this give very satisfactory results with microsurgical safety of op- erations. We use this method of reconstruction in 17–20 patients per year. The standard time of unilateral recon- struction is 2.5–4 hours, of bilateral reconstruction 4–6 hours. Postoperative morbidity in the abdominal region is, as a rule, associated with a weakening of the abdominal wall and the development of hernias (Galli et al., 1992); a perforator flap in which neither muscle nor fasciae are used creates the prerequisite condition for markedly reduced the morbidity associated with the site of flap collection. Although we used a perforator flap three times for reconstructions of the extremities as early as three years ago, we began to use it for breast reconstruction from the beginning of 2000. No doubt this late use of a large skin flap supplied by 1–2 perforators was due to a lack of trust in the provision of adequate blood perfusion for the large amount of tissue of the flap. From the beginning of 2000, in the course of five months, nine DIEP flaps were used for breast reconstructions, in two cases for bilateral reconstruction. In two instances sensory nerves of the flap were sutured to the branch of the intercostal nerves at the site of insertion. Seven flaps healed p.p.i; in two instances we were faced with the complication of postoperative venostasis, calling for revision and connection of the superficial venous system of the flap to the circulation. Subsequent healing was without complications. Preparation of the flap appears to be relatively easy, and the only pitfall is the selection of a suitable perforator. The operation is longer by half an hour than the classical free TRAM; when the sensory nerve of the flap is sutured, it is ca 1 hour longer. We like to use the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction, and it is a reliable method even for the reconstruction of large pendulous breasts. The donor site morbidity is significantly lower.
650    _2
$a mamoplastika $x METODY $x TRENDY $7 D016462
650    _2
$a transplantace tkání $x METODY $7 D016378
650    _2
$a autologní transplantace $x METODY $7 D014182
650    _2
$a chirurgické laloky $7 D013524
650    _2
$a mikrochirurgie $x METODY $7 D008866
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
700    1_
$a Stupka, I. $4 aut
700    1_
$a Dražan, Luboš, $d 1956- $4 aut $7 mzk2006354261
700    1_
$a Holuša, Pavel, $d 1959- $4 aut $7 xx0075627
700    1_
$a Licata, G. $4 aut
700    1_
$a Corradini, B. $4 aut
773    0_
$w MED00000058 $t Acta chirurgiae plasticae $g Roč. 43, č. 1 (2001), s. 3-6 $x 0001-5423
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 3021 $c 507b $y 0
990    __
$a 20010818 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130725143913 $b ABA008
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2001 $b Roč. 43 $c č. 1 $d s. 3-6 $i 0001-5423 $m Acta chirurgiae plasticae (English ed.) $x MED00000058
LZP    __
$b přidání abstraktu

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...