-
Something wrong with this record ?
DIEP flap breast reconstruction - new experience
J. Veselý, I. Stupka, L. Dražan
Language English Country Czech Republic
- MeSH
- Transplantation, Autologous methods MeSH
- Surgical Flaps MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mammaplasty methods trends MeSH
- Microsurgery methods MeSH
- Tissue Transplantation methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Female MeSH
One of the important microsurgical procedures in our department is breast reconstruction after ablations. For many years, the standard method was reconstruction with autologous tissues – a free TRAM flap with a recipient vessels vasa mammaria. We are convinced that this give very satisfactory results with microsurgical safety of op- erations. We use this method of reconstruction in 17–20 patients per year. The standard time of unilateral recon- struction is 2.5–4 hours, of bilateral reconstruction 4–6 hours. Postoperative morbidity in the abdominal region is, as a rule, associated with a weakening of the abdominal wall and the development of hernias (Galli et al., 1992); a perforator flap in which neither muscle nor fasciae are used creates the prerequisite condition for markedly reduced the morbidity associated with the site of flap collection. Although we used a perforator flap three times for reconstructions of the extremities as early as three years ago, we began to use it for breast reconstruction from the beginning of 2000. No doubt this late use of a large skin flap supplied by 1–2 perforators was due to a lack of trust in the provision of adequate blood perfusion for the large amount of tissue of the flap. From the beginning of 2000, in the course of five months, nine DIEP flaps were used for breast reconstructions, in two cases for bilateral reconstruction. In two instances sensory nerves of the flap were sutured to the branch of the intercostal nerves at the site of insertion. Seven flaps healed p.p.i; in two instances we were faced with the complication of postoperative venostasis, calling for revision and connection of the superficial venous system of the flap to the circulation. Subsequent healing was without complications. Preparation of the flap appears to be relatively easy, and the only pitfall is the selection of a suitable perforator. The operation is longer by half an hour than the classical free TRAM; when the sensory nerve of the flap is sutured, it is ca 1 hour longer. We like to use the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction, and it is a reliable method even for the reconstruction of large pendulous breasts. The donor site morbidity is significantly lower.
Lit: 7
Bibliography, etc.Souhrn: decs
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc01009586
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130725143422.0
- 008
- 010600s2001 xr u eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng $b ger $b cze
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Veselý, Jiří, $d 1953- $4 aut $7 jn20000402519
- 245 10
- $a DIEP flap breast reconstruction - new experience / $c J. Veselý, I. Stupka, L. Dražan
- 314 __
- $a Clinic of Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Ann University Hospital, Brno, CZ
- 504 __
- $a Lit: 7
- 504 __
- $a Souhrn: decs
- 520 9_
- $a One of the important microsurgical procedures in our department is breast reconstruction after ablations. For many years, the standard method was reconstruction with autologous tissues – a free TRAM flap with a recipient vessels vasa mammaria. We are convinced that this give very satisfactory results with microsurgical safety of op- erations. We use this method of reconstruction in 17–20 patients per year. The standard time of unilateral recon- struction is 2.5–4 hours, of bilateral reconstruction 4–6 hours. Postoperative morbidity in the abdominal region is, as a rule, associated with a weakening of the abdominal wall and the development of hernias (Galli et al., 1992); a perforator flap in which neither muscle nor fasciae are used creates the prerequisite condition for markedly reduced the morbidity associated with the site of flap collection. Although we used a perforator flap three times for reconstructions of the extremities as early as three years ago, we began to use it for breast reconstruction from the beginning of 2000. No doubt this late use of a large skin flap supplied by 1–2 perforators was due to a lack of trust in the provision of adequate blood perfusion for the large amount of tissue of the flap. From the beginning of 2000, in the course of five months, nine DIEP flaps were used for breast reconstructions, in two cases for bilateral reconstruction. In two instances sensory nerves of the flap were sutured to the branch of the intercostal nerves at the site of insertion. Seven flaps healed p.p.i; in two instances we were faced with the complication of postoperative venostasis, calling for revision and connection of the superficial venous system of the flap to the circulation. Subsequent healing was without complications. Preparation of the flap appears to be relatively easy, and the only pitfall is the selection of a suitable perforator. The operation is longer by half an hour than the classical free TRAM; when the sensory nerve of the flap is sutured, it is ca 1 hour longer. We like to use the DIEP flap for breast reconstruction, and it is a reliable method even for the reconstruction of large pendulous breasts. The donor site morbidity is significantly lower.
- 650 _2
- $a mamoplastika $x METODY $x TRENDY $7 D016462
- 650 _2
- $a transplantace tkání $x METODY $7 D016378
- 650 _2
- $a autologní transplantace $x METODY $7 D014182
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgické laloky $7 D013524
- 650 _2
- $a mikrochirurgie $x METODY $7 D008866
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 700 1_
- $a Stupka, I. $4 aut
- 700 1_
- $a Dražan, Luboš, $d 1956- $4 aut $7 mzk2006354261
- 700 1_
- $a Holuša, Pavel, $d 1959- $4 aut $7 xx0075627
- 700 1_
- $a Licata, G. $4 aut
- 700 1_
- $a Corradini, B. $4 aut
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000058 $t Acta chirurgiae plasticae $g Roč. 43, č. 1 (2001), s. 3-6 $x 0001-5423
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 3021 $c 507b $y 0
- 990 __
- $a 20010818 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130725143913 $b ABA008
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2001 $b Roč. 43 $c č. 1 $d s. 3-6 $i 0001-5423 $m Acta chirurgiae plasticae (English ed.) $x MED00000058
- LZP __
- $b přidání abstraktu