-
Something wrong with this record ?
Effect of subsidy regimes on economic values of functional traits in beef cattle breeding
Wolfová M, Pribyl J, Wolf J, Zahrádková R
Language English Country Germany
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2005-02-01 to 1 year ago
Wiley Online Library (archiv)
from 1997-01-01 to 2012-12-31
- MeSH
- Animal Husbandry economics MeSH
- Breeding MeSH
- Financing, Organized MeSH
- Financing, Government economics MeSH
- Meat MeSH
- Cattle MeSH
- Models, Theoretical MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Cattle MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
We investigated the impact of five monetary subsidy regimes on economic values of traits in a cow-calf pasture production system with surplus calves fed for slaughter. The following regimes were analysed: (1) maximum prices for slaughter animals actually received in the Czech Republic during 2004, with no subsidies of any kind; (2) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of permanent grassland and per calf born; (3) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of agricultural land, per hectare of pasture and meadow, per beef cow in a forage system and per livestock unit; (4) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of agricultural land; (5) no subsidies, but prices received for slaughter animals that covered production costs and resulted in 1% profitability. The modelled farm showed negative profit under real price conditions with no subsidies (regime 1), which led to an underestimation of economic values for functional traits. The same results were obtained in regimes in which subsidies did not depend on the number of animals (3) or on meat production from the enterprise (4). Economic values of production traits (growth and carcass traits) did not vary among subsidy regimes. To determine optimum economic values for functional traits in beef cattle, we advocate using the method applied in subsidy regime 5, no subsidies but prices for slaughter animals that cover production cost and a small profit.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc07520534
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210131149.0
- 008
- 090403s2006 gw e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 __
- $a 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00573.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)16533363
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Wolfová, Marie $7 xx0098558
- 245 10
- $a Effect of subsidy regimes on economic values of functional traits in beef cattle breeding / $c Wolfová M, Pribyl J, Wolf J, Zahrádková R
- 314 __
- $a Research Institute of Animal Production, Prague - Uhríneves, Czech Republic. wolfova.marie@vuzv.cz
- 520 9_
- $a We investigated the impact of five monetary subsidy regimes on economic values of traits in a cow-calf pasture production system with surplus calves fed for slaughter. The following regimes were analysed: (1) maximum prices for slaughter animals actually received in the Czech Republic during 2004, with no subsidies of any kind; (2) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of permanent grassland and per calf born; (3) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of agricultural land, per hectare of pasture and meadow, per beef cow in a forage system and per livestock unit; (4) prices as in (1), with subsidies awarded per hectare of agricultural land; (5) no subsidies, but prices received for slaughter animals that covered production costs and resulted in 1% profitability. The modelled farm showed negative profit under real price conditions with no subsidies (regime 1), which led to an underestimation of economic values for functional traits. The same results were obtained in regimes in which subsidies did not depend on the number of animals (3) or on meat production from the enterprise (4). Economic values of production traits (growth and carcass traits) did not vary among subsidy regimes. To determine optimum economic values for functional traits in beef cattle, we advocate using the method applied in subsidy regime 5, no subsidies but prices for slaughter animals that cover production cost and a small profit.
- 650 _2
- $a chov zvířat $x ekonomika $7 D000822
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a chov $7 D001947
- 650 _2
- $a skot $7 D002417
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a financování vládou $x ekonomika $7 D005380
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a maso $7 D008460
- 650 _2
- $a teoretické modely $7 D008962
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 700 1_
- $a Přibyl, Josef
- 700 1_
- $a Wolf, Jochen $7 uzp2009504217
- 700 1_
- $a Zahrádková, Radka
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007268 $t Journal of animal breeding and genetics $g Roč. 123, č. 2 (2006), s. 97-104 $x 0931-2668
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 9
- 990 __
- $a 20090312170439 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20090717110017 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 638337 $s 491136
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2006 $b 123 $c 2 $d 97-104 $i 0931-2668 $m Journal of animal breeding and genetics $x MED00007268
- LZP __
- $a 2009-B1/vtme