-
Something wrong with this record ?
Induction therapy in lung transplantation: initial single-center experience comparing daclizumab and antithymocyte globulin
Lischke R, Simonek J, Davidová R, Schützner J, Stolz AJ, Vojácek J, Burkert J, Pafko P
Language English Country United States
Document type Controlled Clinical Trial
NLK
ScienceDirect (archiv)
from 1997-01-01 to 2009-12-31
- MeSH
- Antilymphocyte Serum therapeutic use MeSH
- Cytomegalovirus Infections epidemiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Financing, Organized MeSH
- Immunoglobulin G therapeutic use MeSH
- Immunosuppressive Agents therapeutic use MeSH
- Infections epidemiology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Antibodies, Monoclonal therapeutic use MeSH
- Postoperative Complications epidemiology virology MeSH
- Graft Rejection epidemiology MeSH
- Lung Transplantation immunology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Controlled Clinical Trial MeSH
Acute and chronic rejection remain unresolved problems after lung transplantation, despite heavy multidrug immunosuppression. Because acute rejection is associated with inferior outcomes in lung transplantation, we have routinely employed antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or daclizumab as adjuncts to reduce the incidence of rejection episodes. METHODS: We performed a controlled clinical trial of the two therapies to evaluate differences in postoperative rejection, infection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and host survival. Twenty-five consecutive lung transplant patients received ATG (n = 12; group 1) or daclizumab (n = 13; group 2) as an induction agent. The groups showed similar demographics and immunosuppression protocols, differ only in induction agent. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the immediate postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospitalization, ICU stay, or time on ventilator. There were no significant differences in the number of episodes of acute rejection, freedom from BOS, or infections. Freedom from acute rejection was significantly greater with daclizumab than with ATG (P = .037). The 1-year survival for group 1 was 67% and for group 2, 77% (P = .584). CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab constitutes a safe and effective form of induction immunosuppressive therapy. Using a two-dose administration schedule, daclizumab prolonged the time without acute rejection compared to ATG. The differences in the incidence of infectious complications, acute rejection, or BOS as well as the short-term or long-term results were not significantly different. The results of the study justify the further use of daclizumab as an induction agent in patients following lung transplantation.
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc09003377
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210152734.0
- 008
- 091119s2007 xxu e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Lischke, Robert, $d 1966- $7 xx0078729
- 245 10
- $a Induction therapy in lung transplantation: initial single-center experience comparing daclizumab and antithymocyte globulin / $c Lischke R, Simonek J, Davidová R, Schützner J, Stolz AJ, Vojácek J, Burkert J, Pafko P
- 314 __
- $a 3rd Department of Surgery, Thoracic and Lung Transplantation Division, University Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic. robert.lischke@seznam.cz
- 520 9_
- $a Acute and chronic rejection remain unresolved problems after lung transplantation, despite heavy multidrug immunosuppression. Because acute rejection is associated with inferior outcomes in lung transplantation, we have routinely employed antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or daclizumab as adjuncts to reduce the incidence of rejection episodes. METHODS: We performed a controlled clinical trial of the two therapies to evaluate differences in postoperative rejection, infection, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and host survival. Twenty-five consecutive lung transplant patients received ATG (n = 12; group 1) or daclizumab (n = 13; group 2) as an induction agent. The groups showed similar demographics and immunosuppression protocols, differ only in induction agent. RESULTS: No differences were observed in the immediate postoperative outcomes, such as length of hospitalization, ICU stay, or time on ventilator. There were no significant differences in the number of episodes of acute rejection, freedom from BOS, or infections. Freedom from acute rejection was significantly greater with daclizumab than with ATG (P = .037). The 1-year survival for group 1 was 67% and for group 2, 77% (P = .584). CONCLUSIONS: Daclizumab constitutes a safe and effective form of induction immunosuppressive therapy. Using a two-dose administration schedule, daclizumab prolonged the time without acute rejection compared to ATG. The differences in the incidence of infectious complications, acute rejection, or BOS as well as the short-term or long-term results were not significantly different. The results of the study justify the further use of daclizumab as an induction agent in patients following lung transplantation.
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000911
- 650 _2
- $a antilymfocytární sérum $x terapeutické užití $7 D000961
- 650 _2
- $a cytomegalovirové infekce $x epidemiologie $7 D003586
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a rejekce štěpu $x epidemiologie $7 D006084
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunoglobulin G $x terapeutické užití $7 D007074
- 650 _2
- $a imunosupresiva $x terapeutické užití $7 D007166
- 650 _2
- $a infekce $x epidemiologie $7 D007239
- 650 _2
- $a transplantace plic $x imunologie $7 D016040
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $x virologie $7 D011183
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
- 700 1_
- $a Šimonek, Jan $7 xx0093362
- 700 1_
- $a Davidová, Romana $7 xx0093353
- 700 1_
- $a Schützner, Jan, $d 1953- $7 mzk2005294945
- 700 1_
- $a Stolz, Alan J. $7 xx0108017
- 700 1_
- $a Vojáček, Jan, $d 1947- $7 jn20000402578
- 700 1_
- $a Burkert, Jan $7 xx0171077
- 700 1_
- $a Pafko, Pavel, $d 1940- $7 jn19990009946
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004556 $t Transplantation proceedings $g Roč. 39, č. 1 (2007), s. 205-212 $x 0041-1345
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 9
- 990 __
- $a 20090824163150 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20091230093442 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 692545 $s 554459
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2007 $b 39 $c 1 $d 205-212 $i 0041-1345 $m Transplantation proceedings $x MED00004556
- LZP __
- $a 2009-B4/vtme