• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

MCNP-based computational model for the Leksell gamma knife

Trnka J, Novotny J Jr, Kluson J.

. 2007 ; 34 (1) : 63-75.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc09004026
E-zdroje Online

NLK Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2007-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

We have focused on the usage of MCNP code for calculation of Gamma Knife radiation field parameters with a homogenous polystyrene phantom. We have investigated several parameters of the Leksell Gamma Knife radiation field and compared the results with other studies based on EGS4 and PENELOPE code as well as the Leksell Gamma Knife treatment planning system Leksell GammaPlan (LGP). The current model describes all 201 radiation beams together and simulates all the sources in the same time. Within each beam, it considers the technical construction of the source, the source holder, collimator system, the spherical phantom, and surrounding material. We have calculated output factors for various sizes of scoring volumes, relative dose distributions along basic planes including linear dose profiles, integral doses in various volumes, and differential dose volume histograms. All the parameters have been calculated for each collimator size and for the isocentric configuration of the phantom. We have found the calculated output factors to be in agreement with other authors' works except the case of 4 mm collimator size, where averaging over the scoring volume and statistical uncertainties strongly influences the calculated results. In general, all the results are dependent on the choice of the scoring volume. The calculated linear dose profiles and relative dose distributions also match independent studies and the Leksell GammaPlan, but care must be taken about the fluctuations within the plateau, which can influence the normalization, and accuracy in determining the isocenter position, which is important for comparing different dose profiles. The calculated differential dose volume histograms and integral doses have been compared with data provided by the Leksell GammaPlan. The dose volume histograms are in good agreement as well as integral doses calculated in small calculation matrix volumes. However, deviations in integral doses up to 50% can be observed for large volumes such as for the total skull volume. The differences observed in treatment of scattered radiation between the MC method and the LGP may be important in this case. We have also studied the influence of differential direction sampling of primary photons and have found that, due to the anisotropic sampling, doses around the isocenter deviate from each other by up to 6%. With caution about the details of the calculation settings, it is possible to employ the MCNP Monte Carlo code for independent verification of the Leksell Gamma Knife radiation field properties.

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc09004026
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210153727.0
008      
091126s2007 xxu e eng||
009      
AR
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Trnka, Jiří. $7 xx0237908
245    10
$a MCNP-based computational model for the Leksell gamma knife / $c Trnka J, Novotny J Jr, Kluson J.
314    __
$a Department of Dosimetry and Application of Ionizing Radiation, Faculty of Nuclear Sciences and Physical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, 11519 Czech Republic. jiri.trnka.oro@vfn.cz
520    9_
$a We have focused on the usage of MCNP code for calculation of Gamma Knife radiation field parameters with a homogenous polystyrene phantom. We have investigated several parameters of the Leksell Gamma Knife radiation field and compared the results with other studies based on EGS4 and PENELOPE code as well as the Leksell Gamma Knife treatment planning system Leksell GammaPlan (LGP). The current model describes all 201 radiation beams together and simulates all the sources in the same time. Within each beam, it considers the technical construction of the source, the source holder, collimator system, the spherical phantom, and surrounding material. We have calculated output factors for various sizes of scoring volumes, relative dose distributions along basic planes including linear dose profiles, integral doses in various volumes, and differential dose volume histograms. All the parameters have been calculated for each collimator size and for the isocentric configuration of the phantom. We have found the calculated output factors to be in agreement with other authors' works except the case of 4 mm collimator size, where averaging over the scoring volume and statistical uncertainties strongly influences the calculated results. In general, all the results are dependent on the choice of the scoring volume. The calculated linear dose profiles and relative dose distributions also match independent studies and the Leksell GammaPlan, but care must be taken about the fluctuations within the plateau, which can influence the normalization, and accuracy in determining the isocenter position, which is important for comparing different dose profiles. The calculated differential dose volume histograms and integral doses have been compared with data provided by the Leksell GammaPlan. The dose volume histograms are in good agreement as well as integral doses calculated in small calculation matrix volumes. However, deviations in integral doses up to 50% can be observed for large volumes such as for the total skull volume. The differences observed in treatment of scattered radiation between the MC method and the LGP may be important in this case. We have also studied the influence of differential direction sampling of primary photons and have found that, due to the anisotropic sampling, doses around the isocenter deviate from each other by up to 6%. With caution about the details of the calculation settings, it is possible to employ the MCNP Monte Carlo code for independent verification of the Leksell Gamma Knife radiation field properties.
650    _2
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    _2
$a obsah radioaktivních látek v organizmu $7 D001822
650    _2
$a nádory mozku $x radioterapie $7 D001932
650    _2
$a počítačová simulace $7 D003198
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a analýza selhání vybavení $7 D019544
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    _2
$a statistické modely $7 D015233
650    _2
$a metoda Monte Carlo $7 D009010
650    _2
$a radiometrie $x metody $7 D011874
650    _2
$a radiochirurgie $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D016634
650    _2
$a celková dávka radioterapie $7 D011879
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a relativní biologická účinnost $7 D012062
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
700    1_
$a Novotný, Josef, $d 1969- $7 ntka173543
700    1_
$a Klusoň, Jaroslav
773    0_
$w MED00003245 $t Medical physics $g Roč. 34, č. 1 (2007), s. 63-75 $x 0094-2405
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 8
990    __
$a 20091123115031 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20091126172529 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 699844 $s 562256
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2007 $b 34 $c 1 $d 63-75 $i 0094-2405 $m Medical physics $x MED00003245
LZP    __
$a 2009-B3/dkme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace