-
Something wrong with this record ?
Ethical evaluation of compulsory measles immunisation as a Benchmark for good Health Management in the European Union
Peter Schröder-Bäck, Helmut Brand, Ixhel Escamilla, John K. Davies, Caroline Hall, Kieran Hickey, Eleni Jelastopulu, Reli Mechtler, Jaroslav Volf
Language English Country Czech Republic
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Issue
Volume
Source
Source
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
ProQuest Central
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-03-01 to 6 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1993
- MeSH
- Ethical Review legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- European Union MeSH
- Mass Vaccination ethics utilization legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Human Rights psychology legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions prevention & control MeSH
- Mandatory Programs ethics utilization legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Quality Control MeSH
- Health Services Administration ethics trends legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Preventive Health Services ethics methods legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Social Justice ethics psychology legislation & jurisprudence MeSH
- Measles Vaccine therapeutic use MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
The results of the study Benchmarking Regional Health Management II suggest that compulsory measles immunisation is a good practice in public health management. Yet, the potential achievement of the desired health outcome alone is not a sufficient reason to make the immunisation obligatory. Rather, compulsory measles immunisation is a morally challenging measure. In this article, compulsory measles immunisation is critically evaluated from a public health ethics point of view. For this evaluation, a set of ethical criteria is proposed: respect for autonomy, health maximisation, efficiency, proportionality and social justice. The authors suggest it should not be taken for granted that compulsory measles immunisation should be championed, rather, health policy makers in the European Union should try to raise immunisation rates with non-compulsory means.
References provided by Crossref.org
Lit.: 15
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10006137
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161026133124.0
- 008
- 100930s2009 xr e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21101/cejph.a3564 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Schröder-Bäck, Peter
- 245 10
- $a Ethical evaluation of compulsory measles immunisation as a Benchmark for good Health Management in the European Union / $c Peter Schröder-Bäck, Helmut Brand, Ixhel Escamilla, John K. Davies, Caroline Hall, Kieran Hickey, Eleni Jelastopulu, Reli Mechtler, Jaroslav Volf
- 314 __
- $a Department of International Health, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 15
- 520 9_
- $a The results of the study Benchmarking Regional Health Management II suggest that compulsory measles immunisation is a good practice in public health management. Yet, the potential achievement of the desired health outcome alone is not a sufficient reason to make the immunisation obligatory. Rather, compulsory measles immunisation is a morally challenging measure. In this article, compulsory measles immunisation is critically evaluated from a public health ethics point of view. For this evaluation, a set of ethical criteria is proposed: respect for autonomy, health maximisation, efficiency, proportionality and social justice. The authors suggest it should not be taken for granted that compulsory measles immunisation should be championed, rather, health policy makers in the European Union should try to raise immunisation rates with non-compulsory means.
- 650 _2
- $a spalničková vakcína $x terapeutické užití $7 D008458
- 650 _2
- $a služby preventivní péče $x etika $x metody $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D011314
- 650 _2
- $a hromadná vakcinace $x etika $x využití $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D032541
- 650 _2
- $a etické zhodnocení $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D026724
- 650 _2
- $a řízení zdravotnictví $x etika $x trendy $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D006298
- 650 _2
- $a nežádoucí účinky léčiv $x prevence a kontrola $7 D064420
- 650 _2
- $a sociální spravedlnost $x etika $x psychologie $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D012935
- 650 _2
- $a lidská práva $x psychologie $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D006806
- 650 _2
- $a povinné programy $x etika $x využití $x zákonodárství a právo $7 D037141
- 650 _2
- $a řízení kvality $7 D011786
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Evropská unie $7 D005062
- 700 1_
- $a Brand, Helmut, $d 1957- $7 xx0207533
- 700 1_
- $a Escamilla, Ixhel
- 700 1_
- $a Davies, John K.
- 700 1_
- $a Hall, Caroline
- 700 1_
- $a Hickey, Kieran
- 700 1_
- $a Jelastopulu, Eleni
- 700 1_
- $a Mechtler, Reli
- 700 1_
- $a Volf, Jaroslav. $7 _AN046025
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $g Roč. 17, č. 4 (2009), s. 183-186 $x 1210-7778
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 8 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20100315093304 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161026133539 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 715544 $s 578522
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $b 17 $c 4 $d 183-186 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $x MED00001083
- LZP __
- $a 2010-10/ipal