Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Discrepancies between various methods in susceptibility testing and epidemiological analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates

Aikaterini Masgala, Irene Galani, Maria Souli, Helen Giamarellou

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Comparative Study

The susceptibility of 25 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) clinical isolates to four different antimicrobials (trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin) were investigated by disk diffusion, E-test and commercial Sensititre and PASCO broth microdilution techniques. Discrepancies between the results of broth microdilution and the other methods studied were characterized as very major, major and minor errors. Using the broth microdilution as the reference method, 24% of the isolates were found susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 20% to ceftazidime, 0% to piperacillin/tazobactam and 12% to ciprofloxacin. Good correlation was observed between the two broth microdilution Sensititre and PASCO for all antibiotics tested. Disc diffusion and E-test generated inconsistent results for all agents except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. A great genomic diversity was demonstrated within the S. maltophilia strains tested. Although our results confirm that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had some in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these compounds for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, since no randomized controlled trials have been carried out and no correlation between the clinical response and susceptibility testing results has been reported. Furthermore, the high genomic diversity observed in the S. maltophilia strains indicates the need for careful epidemiological evaluation especially in nosocomial outbreaks.

References provided by Crossref.org

Bibliography, etc.

Lit.: 28

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10016140
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210182200.0
008      
100930s2010 xr e eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21101/cejph.a3571 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)20939265
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Masgala, Aikaterini
245    10
$a Discrepancies between various methods in susceptibility testing and epidemiological analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates / $c Aikaterini Masgala, Irene Galani, Maria Souli, Helen Giamarellou
314    __
$a 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology Section, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
504    __
$a Lit.: 28
520    9_
$a The susceptibility of 25 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) clinical isolates to four different antimicrobials (trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin) were investigated by disk diffusion, E-test and commercial Sensititre and PASCO broth microdilution techniques. Discrepancies between the results of broth microdilution and the other methods studied were characterized as very major, major and minor errors. Using the broth microdilution as the reference method, 24% of the isolates were found susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 20% to ceftazidime, 0% to piperacillin/tazobactam and 12% to ciprofloxacin. Good correlation was observed between the two broth microdilution Sensititre and PASCO for all antibiotics tested. Disc diffusion and E-test generated inconsistent results for all agents except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. A great genomic diversity was demonstrated within the S. maltophilia strains tested. Although our results confirm that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had some in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these compounds for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, since no randomized controlled trials have been carried out and no correlation between the clinical response and susceptibility testing results has been reported. Furthermore, the high genomic diversity observed in the S. maltophilia strains indicates the need for careful epidemiological evaluation especially in nosocomial outbreaks.
650    _2
$a pulzní gelová elektroforéza $7 D016521
650    _2
$a gramnegativní bakteriální infekce $x farmakoterapie $7 D016905
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mikrobiální testy citlivosti $x metody $7 D008826
650    _2
$a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia $x genetika $x klasifikace $x účinky léků $7 D020615
650    _2
$a kombinace léků trimethoprim a sulfamethoxazol $x farmakologie $7 D015662
653    00
$a E-test
653    00
$a disk diffusion
653    00
$a broth microdilution
653    00
$a epidemiological analysis
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
700    1_
$a Galani, Irene
700    1_
$a Souli, Maria
700    1_
$a Giamarellou, Helen
773    0_
$w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $g Roč. 18, č. 2 (2010), s. 119-123 $x 1210-7778
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 8
990    __
$a 20100611141136 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20101116113758 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 765169 $s 629028
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 18 $c 2 $d 119-123 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $x MED00001083
LZP    __
$a 2010-20/mkme

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...