-
Something wrong with this record ?
Discrepancies between various methods in susceptibility testing and epidemiological analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates
Aikaterini Masgala, Irene Galani, Maria Souli, Helen Giamarellou
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Comparative Study
Digital library NLK
Full text - Article
Issue
Volume
Source
Source
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004
ProQuest Central
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-03-01 to 6 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1993
PubMed
20939265
DOI
10.21101/cejph.a3571
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- E-test, disk diffusion, broth microdilution, epidemiological analysis,
- MeSH
- Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections drug therapy MeSH
- Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination pharmacology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Microbial Sensitivity Tests methods MeSH
- Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field MeSH
- Stenotrophomonas maltophilia genetics classification drug effects MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Comparative Study MeSH
The susceptibility of 25 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) clinical isolates to four different antimicrobials (trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin) were investigated by disk diffusion, E-test and commercial Sensititre and PASCO broth microdilution techniques. Discrepancies between the results of broth microdilution and the other methods studied were characterized as very major, major and minor errors. Using the broth microdilution as the reference method, 24% of the isolates were found susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 20% to ceftazidime, 0% to piperacillin/tazobactam and 12% to ciprofloxacin. Good correlation was observed between the two broth microdilution Sensititre and PASCO for all antibiotics tested. Disc diffusion and E-test generated inconsistent results for all agents except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. A great genomic diversity was demonstrated within the S. maltophilia strains tested. Although our results confirm that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had some in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these compounds for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, since no randomized controlled trials have been carried out and no correlation between the clinical response and susceptibility testing results has been reported. Furthermore, the high genomic diversity observed in the S. maltophilia strains indicates the need for careful epidemiological evaluation especially in nosocomial outbreaks.
References provided by Crossref.org
Lit.: 28
- 000
- 00000naa 2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc10016140
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20111210182200.0
- 008
- 100930s2010 xr e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.21101/cejph.a3571 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20939265
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Masgala, Aikaterini
- 245 10
- $a Discrepancies between various methods in susceptibility testing and epidemiological analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clinical isolates / $c Aikaterini Masgala, Irene Galani, Maria Souli, Helen Giamarellou
- 314 __
- $a 4th Department of Internal Medicine, Molecular Biology Section, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
- 504 __
- $a Lit.: 28
- 520 9_
- $a The susceptibility of 25 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S. maltophilia) clinical isolates to four different antimicrobials (trimethoprim/sulfomethoxazole, piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin) were investigated by disk diffusion, E-test and commercial Sensititre and PASCO broth microdilution techniques. Discrepancies between the results of broth microdilution and the other methods studied were characterized as very major, major and minor errors. Using the broth microdilution as the reference method, 24% of the isolates were found susceptible to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 20% to ceftazidime, 0% to piperacillin/tazobactam and 12% to ciprofloxacin. Good correlation was observed between the two broth microdilution Sensititre and PASCO for all antibiotics tested. Disc diffusion and E-test generated inconsistent results for all agents except trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. A great genomic diversity was demonstrated within the S. maltophilia strains tested. Although our results confirm that trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole had some in vitro activity against S. maltophilia, further clinical studies are necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of these compounds for the treatment of S. maltophilia infections, since no randomized controlled trials have been carried out and no correlation between the clinical response and susceptibility testing results has been reported. Furthermore, the high genomic diversity observed in the S. maltophilia strains indicates the need for careful epidemiological evaluation especially in nosocomial outbreaks.
- 650 _2
- $a pulzní gelová elektroforéza $7 D016521
- 650 _2
- $a gramnegativní bakteriální infekce $x farmakoterapie $7 D016905
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mikrobiální testy citlivosti $x metody $7 D008826
- 650 _2
- $a Stenotrophomonas maltophilia $x genetika $x klasifikace $x účinky léků $7 D020615
- 650 _2
- $a kombinace léků trimethoprim a sulfamethoxazol $x farmakologie $7 D015662
- 653 00
- $a E-test
- 653 00
- $a disk diffusion
- 653 00
- $a broth microdilution
- 653 00
- $a epidemiological analysis
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Galani, Irene
- 700 1_
- $a Souli, Maria
- 700 1_
- $a Giamarellou, Helen
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $g Roč. 18, č. 2 (2010), s. 119-123 $x 1210-7778
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 8
- 990 __
- $a 20100611141136 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20101116113758 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 765169 $s 629028
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 18 $c 2 $d 119-123 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $x MED00001083
- LZP __
- $a 2010-20/mkme