Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Valacyclovir prophylaxis versus preemptive valganciclovir therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation

T Reischig, P Jindra, O Hes, M Svecova, J Klaboch, V Treska

. 2008 ; 8 (1) : 69-77.

Jazyk angličtina Země Dánsko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, randomizované kontrolované studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc10026693

Both preemptive therapy and universal prophylaxis are used to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after transplantation. Randomized trials comparing both strategies are sparse. Renal transplant recipients at risk for CMV (D+/R-, D+/R+, D-/R+) were randomized to 3-month prophylaxis with valacyclovir (2 g q.i.d., n = 34) or preemptive therapy with valganciclovir (900 mg b.i.d. for a minimum of 14 days, n = 36) for significant CMV DNAemia (>/=2000 copies/mL by quantitative PCR in whole blood) assessed weekly for 16 weeks and at 5, 6, 9 and 12 months. The 12-month incidence of CMV DNAemia was higher in the preemptive group (92% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) while the incidence of CMV disease was not different (6% vs. 9%, p = 0.567). The onset of CMV DNAemia was delayed in the valacyclovir group (37 +/- 22 vs. 187 +/- 110 days, p < 0.001). Significantly higher rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection during 12 months was observed in the preemptive group (36% vs. 15%, p = 0.034). The average CMV-associated costs per patient were $5525 and $2629 in preemptive therapy and valacyclovir, respectively (p < 0.001). However, assuming the cost of $60 per PCR test, there was no difference in overall costs. In conclusion, preemptive valganciclovir therapy and valacyclovir prophylaxis are equally effective in the prevention of CMV disease after renal transplantation.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa 2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc10026693
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20111210192430.0
008      
101028s2008 dk e eng||
009      
AR
024    __
$a 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02031.x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)17973956
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a dk
100    1_
$a Reischig, Tomáš, $d 1972- $7 nlk20050170377
245    10
$a Valacyclovir prophylaxis versus preemptive valganciclovir therapy to prevent cytomegalovirus disease after renal transplantation / $c T Reischig, P Jindra, O Hes, M Svecova, J Klaboch, V Treska
314    __
$a Department of Internal Medicine I, Charles Medical School and Teaching Hospital, Pilsen, Czech Republic. reischig@fnplzen.cz
520    9_
$a Both preemptive therapy and universal prophylaxis are used to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease after transplantation. Randomized trials comparing both strategies are sparse. Renal transplant recipients at risk for CMV (D+/R-, D+/R+, D-/R+) were randomized to 3-month prophylaxis with valacyclovir (2 g q.i.d., n = 34) or preemptive therapy with valganciclovir (900 mg b.i.d. for a minimum of 14 days, n = 36) for significant CMV DNAemia (>/=2000 copies/mL by quantitative PCR in whole blood) assessed weekly for 16 weeks and at 5, 6, 9 and 12 months. The 12-month incidence of CMV DNAemia was higher in the preemptive group (92% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) while the incidence of CMV disease was not different (6% vs. 9%, p = 0.567). The onset of CMV DNAemia was delayed in the valacyclovir group (37 +/- 22 vs. 187 +/- 110 days, p < 0.001). Significantly higher rate of biopsy-proven acute rejection during 12 months was observed in the preemptive group (36% vs. 15%, p = 0.034). The average CMV-associated costs per patient were $5525 and $2629 in preemptive therapy and valacyclovir, respectively (p < 0.001). However, assuming the cost of $60 per PCR test, there was no difference in overall costs. In conclusion, preemptive valganciclovir therapy and valacyclovir prophylaxis are equally effective in the prevention of CMV disease after renal transplantation.
650    _2
$a acyklovir $x analogy a deriváty $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000212
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a antivirové látky $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D000998
650    _2
$a Cytomegalovirus $7 D003587
650    _2
$a cytomegalovirové infekce $x ekonomika $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D003586
650    _2
$a ganciklovir $x analogy a deriváty $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D015774
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a incidence $7 D015994
650    _2
$a transplantace ledvin $x ekonomika $x škodlivé účinky $7 D016030
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a valin $x analogy a deriváty $x ekonomika $x terapeutické užití $7 D014633
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
650    _2
$a financování organizované $7 D005381
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
700    1_
$a Jindra, Pavel, $7 xx0098857 $d 1966-
700    1_
$a Hes, Ondřej, $d 1968- $7 jn20001103502
700    1_
$a Švecová, Miroslava. $7 xx0195769
700    1_
$a Klaboch, Jan. $7 xx0243968
700    1_
$a Třeška, Vladislav, $d 1957- $7 jn20000402436
773    0_
$w MED00006447 $t American journal of transplantation $g Roč. 8, č. 1 (2008), s. 69-77 $x 1600-6135
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 7
990    __
$a 20101028063523 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20101110115037 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 801800 $s 666555
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 8 $c 1 $d 69-77 $m American journal of transplantation $n Am J Transplant $x MED00006447
LZP    __
$a 2010-B3/vtme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé