Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Arthroscopic evaluation of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of rotator cuff tear

R Frei, P Chladek, T Trc, Z Kopecny, J Kautzner

. 2008 ; 10 (2) : 111-114.

Jazyk angličtina Země Polsko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc11004040

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tear--diagnosis; comparison of MRI, ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study--20 patients treated for shoulder pain due to rotator cuff tear, initially conservatively and after more than 6 months by arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Comparison of intraoperative findings with preoperative US and MRI images. RESULTS: Sensitivity of USG--1.0, specificity 0.9. Sensitivity of MRI--0.92, specificity 1.0. DISCUSSION: Clinical examination and physical tests are not fully reliable diagnostic tools in patients with shoulder pain, because symptoms of different conditions overlap. Using ultrasound to visualize the shoulder area has some advantages to other imaging techniques such as CT scan or MRI, and has a very good sensitivity and good specificity. Many authors agree that MRI is one of the most effective methods for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are both very sensitive techniques for diagnosis of rotator cuff abnormalities. Ultrasonography can be used as a primary method owing to its fast procedure and affordable cost.

000      
01943naa 2200481 a 4500
001      
bmc11004040
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170927143812.0
008      
110303s2008 pl e eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)18449121
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a pl
100    1_
$a Frei, Robert. $7 xx0234622
245    10
$a Arthroscopic evaluation of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of rotator cuff tear / $c R Frei, P Chladek, T Trc, Z Kopecny, J Kautzner
314    __
$a II. Orthopedic Department, The Motol University Hospital, 2nd Medical School, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tear--diagnosis; comparison of MRI, ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study--20 patients treated for shoulder pain due to rotator cuff tear, initially conservatively and after more than 6 months by arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Comparison of intraoperative findings with preoperative US and MRI images. RESULTS: Sensitivity of USG--1.0, specificity 0.9. Sensitivity of MRI--0.92, specificity 1.0. DISCUSSION: Clinical examination and physical tests are not fully reliable diagnostic tools in patients with shoulder pain, because symptoms of different conditions overlap. Using ultrasound to visualize the shoulder area has some advantages to other imaging techniques such as CT scan or MRI, and has a very good sensitivity and good specificity. Many authors agree that MRI is one of the most effective methods for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tear. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are both very sensitive techniques for diagnosis of rotator cuff abnormalities. Ultrasonography can be used as a primary method owing to its fast procedure and affordable cost.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a artroskopie $x metody $7 D001182
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lacerace $x diagnóza $7 D022125
650    _2
$a echoplanární zobrazování $7 D017352
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a rotátorová manžeta $x ultrasonografie $7 D017006
650    _2
$a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
650    _2
$a ramenní kloub $x ultrasonografie $7 D012785
650    _2
$a bolest ramene $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D020069
650    _2
$a poranění šlachy $x diagnóza $x ultrasonografie $7 D013708
650    _2
$a poranění rotátorové manžety $7 D000070636
650    _2
$a poranění ramene $7 D000070599
700    1_
$a Chládek, Petr $7 xx0093420
700    1_
$a Trč, Tomáš, $d 1955- $7 nlk19990073953
700    1_
$a Kopečný, Zdeněk, $d 1961- $7 _BN004750
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Jakub. $7 xx0227523
773    0_
$t Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja $w MED00192852 $g Roč. 10, č. 2 (2008), s. 111-114 $x 1509-3492
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 1 $z 0
990    __
$a 20110413123039 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170927143817 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 831380 $s 696065
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2008 $b 10 $c 2 $d 111-114 $i 1509-3492 $m Ortopedia, traumatologia, rehabilitacja $n Ortop Traumatol Rehabil $x MED00192852
LZP    __
$a 2011-3B/ipme

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...