-
Something wrong with this record ?
Benchmark database on isolated small peptides containing an aromatic side chain: comparison between wave function and density functional theory methods and empirical force field
H. Valdés, K. Pluháčková, M. Pitoňák, J. Řezáč, P. Hobza
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study
- MeSH
- Databases, Protein MeSH
- Financing, Organized MeSH
- Protein Conformation MeSH
- Models, Molecular MeSH
- Peptides isolation & purification MeSH
- Publication type
- Comparative Study MeSH
A detailed quantum chemical study on five peptides (WG, WGG, FGG, GGF and GFA) containing the residues phenylalanyl (F), glycyl (G), tryptophyl (W) and alanyl (A) -- where F and W are of aromatic character -- is presented. When investigating isolated small peptides, the dispersion interaction is the dominant attractive force in the peptide backbone-aromatic side chain intramolecular interaction. Consequently, an accurate theoretical study of these systems requires the use of a methodology covering properly the London dispersion forces. For this reason we have assessed the performance of the MP2, SCS-MP2, MP3, TPSS-D, PBE-D, M06-2X, BH&H, TPSS, B3LYP, tight-binding DFT-D methods and ff99 empirical force field compared to CCSD(T)/complete basis set (CBS) limit benchmark data. All the DFT techniques with a '-D' symbol have been augmented by empirical dispersion energy while the M06-2X functional was parameterized to cover the London dispersion energy. For the systems here studied we have concluded that the use of the ff99 force field is not recommended mainly due to problems concerning the assignment of reliable atomic charges. Tight-binding DFT-D is efficient as a screening tool providing reliable geometries. Among the DFT functionals, the M06-2X and TPSS-D show the best performance what is explained by the fact that both procedures cover the dispersion energy. The B3LYP and TPSS functionals-not covering this energy-fail systematically. Both, electronic energies and geometries obtained by means of the wave-function theory methods compare satisfactorily with the CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark data.
- 000
- 03017naa 2200301 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11004048
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20120205093245.0
- 008
- 110303s2008 xxk e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Valdés, Haydee. $7 _AN059471
- 245 10
- $a Benchmark database on isolated small peptides containing an aromatic side chain: comparison between wave function and density functional theory methods and empirical force field / $c H. Valdés, K. Pluháčková, M. Pitoňák, J. Řezáč, P. Hobza
- 314 __
- $a Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic and Center for Biomolecules and Complex Molecular Systems, Prague 6, Czech Republic. haydee.valdes@marge.uochb.cas.cz
- 520 9_
- $a A detailed quantum chemical study on five peptides (WG, WGG, FGG, GGF and GFA) containing the residues phenylalanyl (F), glycyl (G), tryptophyl (W) and alanyl (A) -- where F and W are of aromatic character -- is presented. When investigating isolated small peptides, the dispersion interaction is the dominant attractive force in the peptide backbone-aromatic side chain intramolecular interaction. Consequently, an accurate theoretical study of these systems requires the use of a methodology covering properly the London dispersion forces. For this reason we have assessed the performance of the MP2, SCS-MP2, MP3, TPSS-D, PBE-D, M06-2X, BH&H, TPSS, B3LYP, tight-binding DFT-D methods and ff99 empirical force field compared to CCSD(T)/complete basis set (CBS) limit benchmark data. All the DFT techniques with a '-D' symbol have been augmented by empirical dispersion energy while the M06-2X functional was parameterized to cover the London dispersion energy. For the systems here studied we have concluded that the use of the ff99 force field is not recommended mainly due to problems concerning the assignment of reliable atomic charges. Tight-binding DFT-D is efficient as a screening tool providing reliable geometries. Among the DFT functionals, the M06-2X and TPSS-D show the best performance what is explained by the fact that both procedures cover the dispersion energy. The B3LYP and TPSS functionals-not covering this energy-fail systematically. Both, electronic energies and geometries obtained by means of the wave-function theory methods compare satisfactorily with the CCSD(T)/CBS benchmark data.
- 650 _2
- $a databáze proteinů $7 D030562
- 650 _2
- $a molekulární modely $7 D008958
- 650 _2
- $a peptidy $x izolace a purifikace $7 D010455
- 650 _2
- $a konformace proteinů $7 D011487
- 650 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Pluháčková, Kristýna. $7 _AN040590
- 700 1_
- $a Pitoňák, Michal. $7 xx0226185
- 700 1_
- $a Řezáč, Jan. $7 xx0201209
- 700 1_
- $a Hobza, Pavel, $d 1946- $7 jk01041427
- 773 0_
- $t Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics $w MED00008271 $g Roč. 10, č. 19 (2008), s. 2747-2757 $x 1463-9076
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 1
- 990 __
- $a 20110413122954 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20120205093232 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 831388 $s 696073
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 10 $c 19 $d 2747-2757 $i 1463-9076 $m PCCP. Physical chemistry chemical physics $n Phys Chem Chem Phys $x MED00008271
- LZP __
- $a 2011-3B/ipme