-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Value of power Doppler sonography with 3D reconstruction in preoperative diagnostics of extraprostatic tumor extension in clinically localized prostate cancer
M Zalesky, M Urban, Z Smerhovsky, R Zachoval, M Lukes, J Heracek
Jazyk angličtina Země Austrálie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, hodnotící studie
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1999-02-01 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Online Library (archiv)
od 1997-01-01 do 2012-12-31
- MeSH
- interpretace obrazu počítačem metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multivariační analýza MeSH
- nádory mužských pohlavních orgánů sekundární MeSH
- nádory prostaty chirurgie patologie ultrasonografie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- prostatektomie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- semenné váčky patologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- ultrasonografie dopplerovská metody MeSH
- zobrazování trojrozměrné metody MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Publikační typ
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate the value of preoperative power Doppler sonography with 3D reconstruction (3D-PDS) for diagnostics of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the prospective study we examined 146 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Prior to surgery, each patient underwent 3D-PDS, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and digital rectal examination (DRE). Furthermore, we determined the prostate volume, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD), and Gleason score. The risk of locally advanced cancer was assessed using Partin tables. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of these diagnostic procedures. We plotted the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the areas under the curves (AUC). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the significant predictors of extraprostatic tumor extension. Based on this we developed diagnostic nomograms maximizing the probability of accurate diagnosis. RESULTS: The significant differences between patients with organ confined and locally advanced tumor (based on the postoperative assessment) were observed in the PSA levels (P < 0.014), PSAD (P < 0.004), DRE (P < 0.037), TRUS (P < 0.003), and 3D-PDS (P < 0.000). The highest AUC value of 0.776 (P < 0.000) was found for 3D-PDS. The observed AUC value for TRUS was 0.670 (P < 0.000) and for PSAD 0.639 (P < 0.004). In multivariate regression analysis, the PSAD, preoperative Gleason score, and 3D-PDS finding were identified as significant preoperative predictors of extraprostatic tumor extension. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the 3D-PDS is a valuable preoperative diagnostic examination to identify locally advanced prostate cancer. Therefore, it can be used to maximize the probability of the accurate diagnosis of extraprostatic tumor extension.
- 000
- 02050naa 2200469 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11004545
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121205121604.0
- 008
- 110308s2008 at e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a at
- 100 1_
- $a Záleský, Miroslav $7 ola2004220082
- 245 10
- $a Value of power Doppler sonography with 3D reconstruction in preoperative diagnostics of extraprostatic tumor extension in clinically localized prostate cancer / $c M Zalesky, M Urban, Z Smerhovsky, R Zachoval, M Lukes, J Heracek
- 314 __
- $a Department of Urology, Thomayer's Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic. miroslav.zalesky@ftn.cz
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: The aim of the study is to investigate the value of preoperative power Doppler sonography with 3D reconstruction (3D-PDS) for diagnostics of extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the prospective study we examined 146 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy. Prior to surgery, each patient underwent 3D-PDS, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and digital rectal examination (DRE). Furthermore, we determined the prostate volume, prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density (PSAD), and Gleason score. The risk of locally advanced cancer was assessed using Partin tables. We determined the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of these diagnostic procedures. We plotted the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calculated the areas under the curves (AUC). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the significant predictors of extraprostatic tumor extension. Based on this we developed diagnostic nomograms maximizing the probability of accurate diagnosis. RESULTS: The significant differences between patients with organ confined and locally advanced tumor (based on the postoperative assessment) were observed in the PSA levels (P < 0.014), PSAD (P < 0.004), DRE (P < 0.037), TRUS (P < 0.003), and 3D-PDS (P < 0.000). The highest AUC value of 0.776 (P < 0.000) was found for 3D-PDS. The observed AUC value for TRUS was 0.670 (P < 0.000) and for PSAD 0.639 (P < 0.004). In multivariate regression analysis, the PSAD, preoperative Gleason score, and 3D-PDS finding were identified as significant preoperative predictors of extraprostatic tumor extension. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the 3D-PDS is a valuable preoperative diagnostic examination to identify locally advanced prostate cancer. Therefore, it can be used to maximize the probability of the accurate diagnosis of extraprostatic tumor extension.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a nádory mužských pohlavních orgánů $x sekundární $7 D005834
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a interpretace obrazu počítačem $x metody $7 D007090
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a multivariační analýza $7 D015999
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a prostatektomie $7 D011468
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prostaty $x chirurgie $x patologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D011471
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a semenné váčky $x patologie $7 D012669
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie dopplerovská $x metody $7 D018608
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 700 1_
- $a Urban, Michael, $d 1942- $7 jn20000620393
- 700 1_
- $a Šmerhovský, Zdeněk, $d 1962- $7 mzk2005278245
- 700 1_
- $a Zachoval, Roman, $d 1967- $7 mzk2004248672
- 700 1_
- $a Lukeš, Martin $7 ola2004220083
- 700 1_
- $a Heráček, Jiří, $d 1969- $7 nlk20050170272
- 773 0_
- $t International Journal of Urology $w MED00007209 $g Roč. 15, č. 1 (2008), s. 68-75
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 1
- 990 __
- $a 20110414092905 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121205121636 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 831902 $s 696580
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2008 $b 15 $c 1 $d 68-75 $m International journal of urology $n Int J Urol $x MED00007209
- LZP __
- $a 2011-2B/dkme