-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Three-year follow-up of posterior capsule opacification after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification
J. Nekolová, N. Jirásková, J. Pozlerová, P. Rozsíval
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu randomizované kontrolované studie, srovnávací studie, financování organizované
NLK
ScienceDirect (archiv)
od 1993-01-01 do 2009-12-31
- MeSH
- fakoemulzifikace metody přístrojové vybavení MeSH
- financování organizované MeSH
- implantace nitrooční čočky MeSH
- katarakta etiologie patofyziologie terapie MeSH
- laserová terapie MeSH
- lasery pevnolátkové MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- pooperační komplikace MeSH
- pouzdro oční čočky chirurgie patologie MeSH
- progrese nemoci MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- zraková ostrost MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the degree of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification methods during the 3-year follow-up period. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Setting at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove. Patients with bilateral cataract were included. AquaLase was used in the right eye and NeoSoniX in the left eye of each patient. The AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lens (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) was implanted in all eyes. The Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 software (Developed by Tetz MR and associates, Berlin, Germany) and the Open-Access Systematic Capsule Assessment (OSCA) system (Devised by Aslam TM, Edinburgh, United Kingdom) were used for PCO assessment 1, 2, and 3 years after cataract surgery. RESULTS: Fifty patients were analyzed 1 year, 47 patients 2 years, and 46 patients 3 years after cataract surgery. Mean EPCO 2000 values were for the AquaLase group 0.324 +/- 0.305 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.298 +/- 0.341 (P = .53) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.429 +/- 0.322 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.478 +/- 0.337 (P = .30) 2 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 0.582 +/- 0.506 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.594 +/- 0.515 (P = .87) 3 years after surgery. The OSCA results were for the AquaLase group 0.7097 +/- 0.3778 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.8584 +/- 0.4323 (P = .046) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.7515 +/- 0.4555 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.8103 +/- 0.4498 (P = .44) 2 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 0.9667 +/- 0.736 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.9540 +/- 0.5250 (P = .91) 3 years after surgery. Neodymium-yttrium-aluminun-garnet capsulotomy rate for AquaLase vs NeoSoniX was 0:1 eyes 1 year, 1:3 eyes 2 years, and 1:4 eyes 3 years after surgery. No significant difference between those 2 groups was established, except the OSCA outcomes 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: There was only minimal PCO difference between these 2 approaches, AquaLase and NeoSoniX. Neither AquaLase nor NeoSoniX technique was able to prevent a natural progression of PCO.
- 000
- 03873naa 2200433 a 4500
- 001
- bmc11019489
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121101114138.0
- 008
- 110714s2009 xxu e eng||
- 009
- AR
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Nekolová, Jana. $7 xx0237420
- 245 10
- $a Three-year follow-up of posterior capsule opacification after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification / $c J. Nekolová, N. Jirásková, J. Pozlerová, P. Rozsíval
- 314 __
- $a Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. jani.nekolova@seznam.cz
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: To prospectively compare the degree of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after AquaLase and NeoSoniX phacoemulsification methods during the 3-year follow-up period. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Setting at the Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital in Hradec Kralove. Patients with bilateral cataract were included. AquaLase was used in the right eye and NeoSoniX in the left eye of each patient. The AcrySof SA60AT intraocular lens (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) was implanted in all eyes. The Evaluation of Posterior Capsule Opacification (EPCO) 2000 software (Developed by Tetz MR and associates, Berlin, Germany) and the Open-Access Systematic Capsule Assessment (OSCA) system (Devised by Aslam TM, Edinburgh, United Kingdom) were used for PCO assessment 1, 2, and 3 years after cataract surgery. RESULTS: Fifty patients were analyzed 1 year, 47 patients 2 years, and 46 patients 3 years after cataract surgery. Mean EPCO 2000 values were for the AquaLase group 0.324 +/- 0.305 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.298 +/- 0.341 (P = .53) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.429 +/- 0.322 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.478 +/- 0.337 (P = .30) 2 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 0.582 +/- 0.506 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.594 +/- 0.515 (P = .87) 3 years after surgery. The OSCA results were for the AquaLase group 0.7097 +/- 0.3778 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.8584 +/- 0.4323 (P = .046) 1 year after surgery, for the AquaLase group 0.7515 +/- 0.4555 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.8103 +/- 0.4498 (P = .44) 2 years after surgery, and for the AquaLase group 0.9667 +/- 0.736 and for the NeoSoniX group 0.9540 +/- 0.5250 (P = .91) 3 years after surgery. Neodymium-yttrium-aluminun-garnet capsulotomy rate for AquaLase vs NeoSoniX was 0:1 eyes 1 year, 1:3 eyes 2 years, and 1:4 eyes 3 years after surgery. No significant difference between those 2 groups was established, except the OSCA outcomes 1 year postoperatively. CONCLUSION: There was only minimal PCO difference between these 2 approaches, AquaLase and NeoSoniX. Neither AquaLase nor NeoSoniX technique was able to prevent a natural progression of PCO.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 _2
- $a katarakta $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $x terapie $7 D002386
- 650 _2
- $a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a laserová terapie $7 D053685
- 650 _2
- $a lasery pevnolátkové $7 D053844
- 650 _2
- $a pouzdro oční čočky $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D007903
- 650 _2
- $a implantace nitrooční čočky $7 D019654
- 650 _2
- $a fakoemulzifikace $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D018918
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a financování organizované $7 D005381
- 700 1_
- $a Jirásková, Naďa, $d 1965- $7 mzk2007395044
- 700 1_
- $a Pozlerová, Jana, $d 1981- $7 xx0139721
- 700 1_
- $a Rozsíval, Pavel, $d 1950- $7 nlk19990073794
- 773 0_
- $t American Journal of Ophthalmology $w MED00000272 $g Roč. 148, č. 3 (2009), s. 390-395
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 615 $y 2
- 990 __
- $a 20110715113950 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121101114142 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 864450 $s 729365
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $x MED00000272 $b 148 $c 3 $d 390-395 $m American journal of ophthalmology $n Am J Ophthalmol
- LZP __
- $a 2011-3B09/Bjvme