Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Benign fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodule: to repeat or not to repeat?

F. Gabalec, J. Čáp, A. Ryška, T. Vašátko, V. Ceeová

. 2009 ; 161 (6) : 933-937.

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

CONTEXT: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the gold standard for evaluating thyroid nodules. It has a sensitivity rate of about 95%, i.e. false negative results represent up to 5% of cases. The value of repeated FNAC during follow-up is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of repeating the FNAC for initially benign nodules. DESIGN AND METHODS: All 5017 patients who underwent FNAC of the thyroid nodule in years 1991-2008 were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Repeated FNAC was performed in 574 nodules with initially benign results. The number of repetitions varied from one to six. Repeatedly benign results were found in 498 cases, and malignant/suspicious results with initially benign cytology were found in 76 nodules (13.2%). Carcinoma was present in 13 out of the 58 surgically treated malignant/suspicious results of initially benign cytology. CONCLUSIONS: A change from a benign FNAC result to a malignant/suspicious one was present in more than 13% of the patients with initially benign cytology; malignancy has been recognised on the basis of repeated FNAC in 2.3% patients. In the majority of cases, the repetition corrected wrong cytological interpretation of results other than colloidal goitre, especially Hashimoto's thyroiditis and regressive changes. We believe that repeating FNAC in patients with benign cytology in about a 1-year horizon can reduce the rate of undiagnosed tumours.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
03015naa 2200433 a 4500
001      
bmc11022309
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20221005143158.0
008      
110729s2009 xxk e Eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1530/EJE-09-0514 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)19776203
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $c ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Gabalec, Filip $7 xx0108078
245    10
$a Benign fine-needle aspiration cytology of thyroid nodule: to repeat or not to repeat? / $c F. Gabalec, J. Čáp, A. Ryška, T. Vašátko, V. Ceeová
314    __
$a Second Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Teaching Hospital in Hradec Kralove, Sokolska 581, 500-05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. gabalec@fnhk.cz
520    9_
$a CONTEXT: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the gold standard for evaluating thyroid nodules. It has a sensitivity rate of about 95%, i.e. false negative results represent up to 5% of cases. The value of repeated FNAC during follow-up is still controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of repeating the FNAC for initially benign nodules. DESIGN AND METHODS: All 5017 patients who underwent FNAC of the thyroid nodule in years 1991-2008 were retrospectively evaluated. RESULTS: Repeated FNAC was performed in 574 nodules with initially benign results. The number of repetitions varied from one to six. Repeatedly benign results were found in 498 cases, and malignant/suspicious results with initially benign cytology were found in 76 nodules (13.2%). Carcinoma was present in 13 out of the 58 surgically treated malignant/suspicious results of initially benign cytology. CONCLUSIONS: A change from a benign FNAC result to a malignant/suspicious one was present in more than 13% of the patients with initially benign cytology; malignancy has been recognised on the basis of repeated FNAC in 2.3% patients. In the majority of cases, the repetition corrected wrong cytological interpretation of results other than colloidal goitre, especially Hashimoto's thyroiditis and regressive changes. We believe that repeating FNAC in patients with benign cytology in about a 1-year horizon can reduce the rate of undiagnosed tumours.
590    __
$a bohemika - dle Pubmed
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a tenkojehlová biopsie $x metody $7 D044963
650    _2
$a falešně negativní reakce $7 D005188
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reoperace $7 D012086
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a uzly štítné žlázy $x diagnóza $x patologie $x ultrasonografie $7 D016606
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Čáp, Jan, $d 1953- $7 mzk2003190513
700    1_
$a Ryška, Aleš, $d 1970- $7 nlk20020124969
700    1#
$a Vašátko, Tomáš. $7 xx0239578
700    1_
$a Ceeová, Věra $7 xx0142514
773    0_
$t European Journal of Endocrinology $w MED00009634 $g Roč. 161, č. 6 (2009), s. 933-937
856    41
$u https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-09-0514 $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b x $y 2 $z 0
990    __
$a 20110801125528 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20221005143154 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 881703 $s 732228
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2009 $x MED00009634 $b 161 $c 6 $d 933-937 $m European journal of endocrinology $n Eur J Endocrinol
LZP    __
$a 2011-4B09/jvme

Find record

Citation metrics

Logged in users only