-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population?
O. Coufal, T. Pavlík, P. Fabian, R. Bori, G. Boross, I. Sejben, R. Maráz, J. Koča, E. Krejčí, I. Horáková, V. Foltinová, P. Vrtělová, V. Chrenko, Tekle W Eliza, M. Rajtar, M. Svebis, V. Fait, G. Cserni
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1997-03-01 do 2019-01-31
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1997-03-01 do 2019-01-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1997-03-01 do 2019-01-31
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 1995
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lymfatické metastázy diagnóza patologie MeSH
- nádory prsu etnologie patologie MeSH
- nomogramy MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- ROC křivka MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Several models have previously been proposed to predict the probability of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of two previously published nomograms (MSKCC, Stanford) and to develop an alternative model with the best predictive accuracy in a Czech population. In the basic population of 330 SLN-positive patients from the Czech Republic, the accuracy of the MSKCC and the Stanford nomograms was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). A new model (MOU nomogram) was proposed according to the results of multivariate analysis of relevant clinicopathologic variables. The new model was validated in an independent test population from Hungary (383 patients). In the basic population, six of 27 patients with isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the SLN harbored additional NSLN metastases. The AUCs of the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms were 0.68 and 0.66, respectively; for the MOU nomogram it reached 0.76. In the test population, the AUC of the MOU nomogram was similar to that of the basic population (0.74). The presence of only ITC in SLN does not preclude further nodal involvement. Additional variables are beneficial when considering the probability of NSLN metastases. In the basic population, the previously published nomograms (MSKCC and Stanford) showed only limited accuracy. The developed MOU nomogram proved more suitable for the basic population, such as for another independent population from a mid-European country.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 03661naa a2200601 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12009127
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130730101144.0
- 008
- 120319s2009 ne eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 __
- $a 10.1007/s12253-009-9177-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)19440855
- 040 __
- $d ABA008 $a ABA008 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Coufal, Oldřich $7 xx0073748 $u Department of Surgical Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Zluty kopec, Brno
- 245 10
- $a Predicting non-sentinel lymph node status after positive sentinel biopsy in breast cancer: what model performs the best in a Czech population? / $c O. Coufal, T. Pavlík, P. Fabian, R. Bori, G. Boross, I. Sejben, R. Maráz, J. Koča, E. Krejčí, I. Horáková, V. Foltinová, P. Vrtělová, V. Chrenko, Tekle W Eliza, M. Rajtar, M. Svebis, V. Fait, G. Cserni
- 520 9_
- $a Several models have previously been proposed to predict the probability of non-sentinel lymph node (NSLN) metastases after a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy in breast cancer. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of two previously published nomograms (MSKCC, Stanford) and to develop an alternative model with the best predictive accuracy in a Czech population. In the basic population of 330 SLN-positive patients from the Czech Republic, the accuracy of the MSKCC and the Stanford nomograms was tested by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC). A new model (MOU nomogram) was proposed according to the results of multivariate analysis of relevant clinicopathologic variables. The new model was validated in an independent test population from Hungary (383 patients). In the basic population, six of 27 patients with isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the SLN harbored additional NSLN metastases. The AUCs of the MSKCC and Stanford nomograms were 0.68 and 0.66, respectively; for the MOU nomogram it reached 0.76. In the test population, the AUC of the MOU nomogram was similar to that of the basic population (0.74). The presence of only ITC in SLN does not preclude further nodal involvement. Additional variables are beneficial when considering the probability of NSLN metastases. In the basic population, the previously published nomograms (MSKCC and Stanford) showed only limited accuracy. The developed MOU nomogram proved more suitable for the basic population, such as for another independent population from a mid-European country.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 02
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 02
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 02
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 02
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 02
- $a nádory prsu $x etnologie $x patologie $7 D001943
- 650 02
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 02
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 02
- $a lymfatické metastázy $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D008207
- 650 02
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 02
- $a nomogramy $7 D049451
- 650 02
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 02
- $a ROC křivka $7 D012372
- 650 02
- $a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $7 D021701
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 700 1_
- $a Pavlík, Tomáš $7 xx0093293
- 700 1_
- $a Fabian, Pavel $7 xx0041823
- 700 1_
- $a Bori, Rita
- 700 1_
- $a Boross, Gábor
- 700 1_
- $a Sejben, István
- 700 1_
- $a Maráz, Róbert
- 700 1_
- $a Koča, Jaroslav, $d 1955-2021 $7 jn20000710314
- 700 1_
- $a Krejčí, Eva $7 xx0061138
- 700 1_
- $a Horáková, Iva $7 xx0164162
- 700 1_
- $a Foltinová, Vendula. $7 xx0241084
- 700 1_
- $a Vrtělová, Pavlína $7 xx0169222
- 700 1_
- $a Chrenko, Vojtěch, $d 1950- $7 xx0061125
- 700 1_
- $a Tekle, Eliza Wolde
- 700 1_
- $a Rajtár, Maria
- 700 1_
- $a Svébis, Mihaly
- 700 1_
- $a Fait, Vuk $7 xx0053339
- 700 1_
- $a Cserni, Gabor
- 773 0_
- $t Pathology Oncology Research $p Pathol Oncol Res $g Roč. 15, č. 4 (2009), s. 733-740 $x def $w MED00180530
- 773 0_
- $p Pathol Oncol Res $g 15(4):733-40, 2009 Dec
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b x $y 4
- 990 __
- $a 20120319150847 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130730101640 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 902351 $s 766033
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 2009 $b 15 $c 4 $d 733-740 $i def $m Pathology oncology research $x MED00180530
- LZP __
- $a 2012-1Q10/