-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Shock index: a simple clinical parameter for quick mortality risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction
D. Bilkova, Z. Motovska, P. Widimsky, J. Dvorak, L. Lisa, T. Budesinsky
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- analýza přežití MeSH
- balónková koronární angioplastika MeSH
- elektrokardiografie MeSH
- hodnocení rizik metody MeSH
- infarkt myokardu komplikace mortalita terapie MeSH
- interval spolehlivosti MeSH
- kardiogenní šok diagnóza etiologie mortalita MeSH
- koronární angiografie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití trendy MeSH
- mortalita v nemocnicích trendy MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- odds ratio MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- rizikové faktory MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Early identification of patients at risk for developing cardiogenic shock allows rapid decision making to determine reperfusion and transportation to a PCI centre. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate shock index (SI) as a marker for patients at risk of cardiogenic shock. METHODS: A total of 644 consecutive patients (73% male) with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevations were analyzed retrospectively. Primary PCI was performed in 92% of patients, and 7% of patients underwent rescue PCI. The SI parameter was defined as the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure at hospital admission. RESULTS: SI (odds ratio [OR], 81.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.76-676.51; P<0.001), age (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; P<0.001), and diabetes (OR, 4.94; 95% CI, 1.44-16.97; P<0.011) were independent predictors of mortality. In the group of patients with SI≥0.8, 20% died, whereas in the group with SI<0.8, 4% of patients died (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed clinical parameter SI correlates with patients' prognosis and could therefore be used as a simple indicator of mortality risk of acute myocardial infarction. The simplicity of this proposed index makes its use accessible in large-scale clinical practices for risk stratification during first contact with patients.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12022159
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160128133624.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120806s2011 xxk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.cjca.2011.07.008 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21944278
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Mocová, Danuše. $7 xx0193836 $u Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic. dbilk@email.cz
- 245 10
- $a Shock index: a simple clinical parameter for quick mortality risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction / $c D. Bilkova, Z. Motovska, P. Widimsky, J. Dvorak, L. Lisa, T. Budesinsky
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has become the preferred reperfusion strategy in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Early identification of patients at risk for developing cardiogenic shock allows rapid decision making to determine reperfusion and transportation to a PCI centre. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate shock index (SI) as a marker for patients at risk of cardiogenic shock. METHODS: A total of 644 consecutive patients (73% male) with acute myocardial infarction with ST elevations were analyzed retrospectively. Primary PCI was performed in 92% of patients, and 7% of patients underwent rescue PCI. The SI parameter was defined as the ratio of heart rate to systolic blood pressure at hospital admission. RESULTS: SI (odds ratio [OR], 81.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.76-676.51; P<0.001), age (OR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08-1.26; P<0.001), and diabetes (OR, 4.94; 95% CI, 1.44-16.97; P<0.011) were independent predictors of mortality. In the group of patients with SI≥0.8, 20% died, whereas in the group with SI<0.8, 4% of patients died (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed clinical parameter SI correlates with patients' prognosis and could therefore be used as a simple indicator of mortality risk of acute myocardial infarction. The simplicity of this proposed index makes its use accessible in large-scale clinical practices for risk stratification during first contact with patients.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a balónková koronární angioplastika $7 D015906
- 650 _2
- $a interval spolehlivosti $7 D016001
- 650 _2
- $a koronární angiografie $7 D017023
- 650 _2
- $a elektrokardiografie $7 D004562
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a mortalita v nemocnicích $x trendy $7 D017052
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a infarkt myokardu $x komplikace $x mortalita $x terapie $7 D009203
- 650 _2
- $a odds ratio $7 D016017
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení rizik $x metody $7 D018570
- 650 _2
- $a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
- 650 _2
- $a kardiogenní šok $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x mortalita $7 D012770
- 650 _2
- $a analýza přežití $7 D016019
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $x trendy $7 D015996
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Moťovská, Zuzana $7 xx0104795 $u Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Widimský, Petr, $d 1954- $7 jn20000402682 $u Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Dvořák, Jaroslav $7 xx0083040 $u Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Lisa, Libor $7 xx0155496 $u Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Buděšínský, Tomáš $7 xx0155495 $u Cardiocenter, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001009 $t The Canadian journal of cardiology $x 1916-7075 $g Roč. 27, č. 6 (2011), s. 739-742
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21944278 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120806 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160128133750 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 944072 $s 779456
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 27 $c 6 $d 739-742 $e 20110922 $i 1916-7075 $m Canadian journal of cardiology $n Can J Cardiol $x MED00001009
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01