-
Something wrong with this record ?
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years
Z. Kadaňka, J. Bednařík, O. Novotný, I. Urbánek, L. Dušek,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1997 to 2014
PubMed Central
from 1997 to 2014
Europe PubMed Central
from 1997 to 2014
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Decompression, Surgical MeSH
- Activities of Daily Living MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Spinal Cord Compression surgery therapy MeSH
- Cervical Vertebrae surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Follow-Up Studies MeSH
- Disability Evaluation MeSH
- Disease Progression MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Spondylosis surgery therapy MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery to treat the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (CSM) are any better than those of a conservative approach. A 10-year prospective randomised study was performed. The objective of the study was to compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of CSM. Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups of 32. Group A was treated conservatively while group B was treated surgically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, score of daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and by subjective assessment by the patients themselves. Seventeen patents died of natural, unrelated causes, during the follow-up. A total of 25 patients in the conservatively and 22 in the surgically treated group were used for the final evaluation. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in mJOA score, in subjective evaluation by the patients themselves and in evaluation of video-recordings of daily living activities by two observers blinded to treatment mode. There was neither any difference found in the percentage of patients losing the ability to walk nor in the time taken to cover the 10-m track from a standing start. Comparison of conservative and surgical treatment in mild and moderate forms of CSM in a 10-year follow-up has not shown, on average, a significant difference in results. In both groups, patients get better and worse. According to the power analysis it is necessary admit that these results possess the low ability to answer definitely the question which treatment is better for the patients with a mild and moderate non-progressive CSM because of the low number of patients for the final evaluation and for clinically negligible differences between two compared arms. These findings can serve as a worthy odds-on hypothesis which needs the confirmation.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12022274
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130509132107.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120806e20110426gw f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00586-011-1811-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21519928
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Kadaňka, Zdeněk, $d 1942- $7 jn20000710129 $u Department of Neurology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic. zkadan@fnbrno.cz
- 245 10
- $a Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years / $c Z. Kadaňka, J. Bednařík, O. Novotný, I. Urbánek, L. Dušek,
- 520 9_
- $a It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery to treat the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (CSM) are any better than those of a conservative approach. A 10-year prospective randomised study was performed. The objective of the study was to compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of CSM. Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups of 32. Group A was treated conservatively while group B was treated surgically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, score of daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and by subjective assessment by the patients themselves. Seventeen patents died of natural, unrelated causes, during the follow-up. A total of 25 patients in the conservatively and 22 in the surgically treated group were used for the final evaluation. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in mJOA score, in subjective evaluation by the patients themselves and in evaluation of video-recordings of daily living activities by two observers blinded to treatment mode. There was neither any difference found in the percentage of patients losing the ability to walk nor in the time taken to cover the 10-m track from a standing start. Comparison of conservative and surgical treatment in mild and moderate forms of CSM in a 10-year follow-up has not shown, on average, a significant difference in results. In both groups, patients get better and worse. According to the power analysis it is necessary admit that these results possess the low ability to answer definitely the question which treatment is better for the patients with a mild and moderate non-progressive CSM because of the low number of patients for the final evaluation and for clinically negligible differences between two compared arms. These findings can serve as a worthy odds-on hypothesis which needs the confirmation.
- 650 _2
- $a činnosti denního života $7 D000203
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a krční obratle $x chirurgie $7 D002574
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgická dekomprese $7 D019299
- 650 _2
- $a posuzování pracovní neschopnosti $7 D004185
- 650 _2
- $a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a komprese míchy $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D013117
- 650 _2
- $a spondylóza $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D055009
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Bednařík, Josef, $d 1954- $7 jn20000919541
- 700 1_
- $a Novotný, Oldřich. $7 _AN043925
- 700 1_
- $a Urbánek, Igor $7 xx0136498
- 700 1_
- $a Dušek, Ladislav, $d 1967- $7 mzk2003181727
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001666 $t European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society $x 1432-0932 $g Roč. 20, č. 9 (20110426), s. 1533-1538
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21519928 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120806 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130509132412 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 944187 $s 779571
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 20 $c 9 $d 1533-1538 $e 20110426 $i 1432-0932 $m European spine journal $n Eur Spine J $x MED00001666
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01