Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years

Z. Kadaňka, J. Bednařík, O. Novotný, I. Urbánek, L. Dušek,

. 2011 ; 20 (9) : 1533-1538. [pub] 20110426

Language English Country Germany

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK Free Medical Journals from 1997 to 2014
PubMed Central from 1997 to 2014
Europe PubMed Central from 1997 to 2014
ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery to treat the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (CSM) are any better than those of a conservative approach. A 10-year prospective randomised study was performed. The objective of the study was to compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of CSM. Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups of 32. Group A was treated conservatively while group B was treated surgically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, score of daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and by subjective assessment by the patients themselves. Seventeen patents died of natural, unrelated causes, during the follow-up. A total of 25 patients in the conservatively and 22 in the surgically treated group were used for the final evaluation. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in mJOA score, in subjective evaluation by the patients themselves and in evaluation of video-recordings of daily living activities by two observers blinded to treatment mode. There was neither any difference found in the percentage of patients losing the ability to walk nor in the time taken to cover the 10-m track from a standing start. Comparison of conservative and surgical treatment in mild and moderate forms of CSM in a 10-year follow-up has not shown, on average, a significant difference in results. In both groups, patients get better and worse. According to the power analysis it is necessary admit that these results possess the low ability to answer definitely the question which treatment is better for the patients with a mild and moderate non-progressive CSM because of the low number of patients for the final evaluation and for clinically negligible differences between two compared arms. These findings can serve as a worthy odds-on hypothesis which needs the confirmation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12022274
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130509132107.0
007      
ta
008      
120806e20110426gw f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00586-011-1811-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21519928
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Kadaňka, Zdeněk, $d 1942- $7 jn20000710129 $u Department of Neurology, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Jihlavská 20, 63900 Brno, Czech Republic. zkadan@fnbrno.cz
245    10
$a Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: conservative versus surgical treatment after 10 years / $c Z. Kadaňka, J. Bednařík, O. Novotný, I. Urbánek, L. Dušek,
520    9_
$a It is not known whether the results of decompressive surgery to treat the mild and moderate forms of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (CSM) are any better than those of a conservative approach. A 10-year prospective randomised study was performed. The objective of the study was to compare conservative and operative treatments of mild and moderate, non-progressive, or slowly progressive, forms of CSM. Sixty-four patients were randomised into two groups of 32. Group A was treated conservatively while group B was treated surgically. The clinical outcome was evaluated by modified JOA score, timed 10-m walk, score of daily activities recorded by video and evaluated by two observers blinded to the type of therapy, and by subjective assessment by the patients themselves. Seventeen patents died of natural, unrelated causes, during the follow-up. A total of 25 patients in the conservatively and 22 in the surgically treated group were used for the final evaluation. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups in mJOA score, in subjective evaluation by the patients themselves and in evaluation of video-recordings of daily living activities by two observers blinded to treatment mode. There was neither any difference found in the percentage of patients losing the ability to walk nor in the time taken to cover the 10-m track from a standing start. Comparison of conservative and surgical treatment in mild and moderate forms of CSM in a 10-year follow-up has not shown, on average, a significant difference in results. In both groups, patients get better and worse. According to the power analysis it is necessary admit that these results possess the low ability to answer definitely the question which treatment is better for the patients with a mild and moderate non-progressive CSM because of the low number of patients for the final evaluation and for clinically negligible differences between two compared arms. These findings can serve as a worthy odds-on hypothesis which needs the confirmation.
650    _2
$a činnosti denního života $7 D000203
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a krční obratle $x chirurgie $7 D002574
650    _2
$a chirurgická dekomprese $7 D019299
650    _2
$a posuzování pracovní neschopnosti $7 D004185
650    _2
$a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a následné studie $7 D005500
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a komprese míchy $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D013117
650    _2
$a spondylóza $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D055009
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Bednařík, Josef, $d 1954- $7 jn20000919541
700    1_
$a Novotný, Oldřich. $7 _AN043925
700    1_
$a Urbánek, Igor $7 xx0136498
700    1_
$a Dušek, Ladislav, $d 1967- $7 mzk2003181727
773    0_
$w MED00001666 $t European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society $x 1432-0932 $g Roč. 20, č. 9 (20110426), s. 1533-1538
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21519928 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120806 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130509132412 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 944187 $s 779571
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 20 $c 9 $d 1533-1538 $e 20110426 $i 1432-0932 $m European spine journal $n Eur Spine J $x MED00001666
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120806/12/01

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...