-
Something wrong with this record ?
Our experience with transoral incisionless plication of gastroesophageal reflux disease: NOTES procedure
P. Svoboda, I. Kantorová, L. Kozumplík, P. Scheer, M. Radvan, J. Radvanová, V. Krass, F. Horálek
Language English Country Greece
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
21937380
DOI
10.5754/hge10108
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Length of Stay MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Fundoplication methods MeSH
- Gastroesophageal Reflux psychology surgery MeSH
- Quality of Life MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Natural Orifice Transluminal Surgery (NOTES) has been introduced in endoscopic surgery as a new system offering the advantage of a less invasive procedure. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) appears to be the most promising application of NOTES treatment. The aims of our study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure and length of hospital stay. METHODOLOGY: Patients indicated for surgery of GERD were randomly assigned (ratio 2:1) to transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF group, n=34) and control group, where gold standard Nissen laparoscopic fundoplication was performed (NLF group, n=18). For TIF the Plicator® method was initially used for 18 patients, but the company terminated production in 2008 without a follower. During the last 2 years the EsophyX® method was used for 16 patients. RESULTS: After the evaluation of 34 TIF patients and 18 NLF patients we observed similar efficacy of TIF procedures compared with NLF after 3 and 12 months. The hospital stay was significantly shorter (p<0.0001) in TIF group (average, 2.9±0.8 days) than in NLF group (6.4±0.7). The TIF procedure was safe; we observed 1 serious adverse event in the TIF group and 3 in the NLF group. CONCLUSIONS: It can be summarized that both NOTES TIF procedures are, after the initial learning curve, safe and effective methods for treatment of GERD, allowing substantial shortening of hospital stay. The effect of both procedures was sustained over 12 months. Longer follow-up is necessary to verify efficacy for more years.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12022300
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160405114753.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120806s2011 gr f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5754/hge10108 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21937380
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gr
- 100 1_
- $a Svoboda, Petr, $d 1950- $7 mzk2005269704 $u Trauma Hospital, Brno, Czech Republic. p.svoboda@unbr.cz
- 245 10
- $a Our experience with transoral incisionless plication of gastroesophageal reflux disease: NOTES procedure / $c P. Svoboda, I. Kantorová, L. Kozumplík, P. Scheer, M. Radvan, J. Radvanová, V. Krass, F. Horálek
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND/AIMS: Natural Orifice Transluminal Surgery (NOTES) has been introduced in endoscopic surgery as a new system offering the advantage of a less invasive procedure. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) appears to be the most promising application of NOTES treatment. The aims of our study were to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this procedure and length of hospital stay. METHODOLOGY: Patients indicated for surgery of GERD were randomly assigned (ratio 2:1) to transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF group, n=34) and control group, where gold standard Nissen laparoscopic fundoplication was performed (NLF group, n=18). For TIF the Plicator® method was initially used for 18 patients, but the company terminated production in 2008 without a follower. During the last 2 years the EsophyX® method was used for 16 patients. RESULTS: After the evaluation of 34 TIF patients and 18 NLF patients we observed similar efficacy of TIF procedures compared with NLF after 3 and 12 months. The hospital stay was significantly shorter (p<0.0001) in TIF group (average, 2.9±0.8 days) than in NLF group (6.4±0.7). The TIF procedure was safe; we observed 1 serious adverse event in the TIF group and 3 in the NLF group. CONCLUSIONS: It can be summarized that both NOTES TIF procedures are, after the initial learning curve, safe and effective methods for treatment of GERD, allowing substantial shortening of hospital stay. The effect of both procedures was sustained over 12 months. Longer follow-up is necessary to verify efficacy for more years.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a fundoplikace $x metody $7 D018662
- 650 _2
- $a gastroezofageální reflux $x psychologie $x chirurgie $7 D005764
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a délka pobytu $7 D007902
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $7 D011788
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kantorová, Ilona $7 xx0060603
- 700 1_
- $a Kozumplík, Ladislav $7 xx0082961
- 700 1_
- $a Scheer, Peter, $d 1973- $7 xx0033760
- 700 1_
- $a Radvan, Martin $7 xx0137562
- 700 1_
- $a Radvanová, Jana $7 xx0137564
- 700 1_
- $a Krass, Vladimír $7 xx0239999
- 700 1_
- $a Horálek, František $7 xx0076510
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002025 $t Hepato-gastroenterology $x 0172-6390 $g Roč. 58, č. 109 (2011), s. 1208-1213
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21937380 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120806 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160405114829 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 944213 $s 779597
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 58 $c 109 $d 1208-1213 $i 0172-6390 $m Hepato-gastroenterology $n Hepatogastroenterology $x MED00002025
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01