• Something wrong with this record ?

Magnetic resonance imaging in postprostatectomy radiotherapy planning

J. Sefrova, K. Odrazka, P. Paluska, Z. Belobradek, M. Brodak, M. Dolezel, P. Prosvic, Z. Macingova, M. Vosmik, P. Hoffmann, M. Louda, A. Nejedla

. 2012 ; 82 (2) : 911-918.

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate bed treatment planning could influence definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 21 consecutive patients referred for prostate bed radiotherapy were included in the present retrospective study. The CTV was delineated according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations on computed tomography (CT) and T(1)-weighted (T(1)w) and T(2)-weighted (T(2)w) MRI. The CTV magnitude, agreement, and spatial differences were evaluated on the planning CT scan after registration with the MRI scans. RESULTS: The CTV was significantly reduced on the T(1)w and T(2)w MRI scans (13% and 9%, respectively) compared with the CT scans. The urinary bladder was drawn smaller on the CT scans and the rectum was smaller on the MRI scans. On T(1)w MRI, the rectum and urinary bladder were delineated larger than on T(2)w MRI. Minimal agreement was observed between the CT and T(2)w images. The main spatial differences were measured in the superior and superolateral directions in which the CTV on the MRI scans was 1.8-2.9 mm smaller. In the posterior and inferior border, no difference was seen between the CT and T(1)w MRI scans. On the T(2)w MRI scans, the CTV was larger in these directions (by 1.3 and 1.7 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI in postprostatectomy radiotherapy planning resulted in a reduction of the CTV. The main differences were found in the superior part of the prostate bed. We believe T(2)w MRI enables more precise definition of prostate bed CTV than conventional planning CT.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12022323
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160425152528.0
007      
ta
008      
120806s2012 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.11.004 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21420244
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šefrová, Jana $7 xx0135654 $u Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Hradec Kralove, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. sefrova@post.cz
245    10
$a Magnetic resonance imaging in postprostatectomy radiotherapy planning / $c J. Sefrova, K. Odrazka, P. Paluska, Z. Belobradek, M. Brodak, M. Dolezel, P. Prosvic, Z. Macingova, M. Vosmik, P. Hoffmann, M. Louda, A. Nejedla
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To investigate whether the use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate bed treatment planning could influence definition of the clinical target volume (CTV) and organs at risk. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 21 consecutive patients referred for prostate bed radiotherapy were included in the present retrospective study. The CTV was delineated according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer recommendations on computed tomography (CT) and T(1)-weighted (T(1)w) and T(2)-weighted (T(2)w) MRI. The CTV magnitude, agreement, and spatial differences were evaluated on the planning CT scan after registration with the MRI scans. RESULTS: The CTV was significantly reduced on the T(1)w and T(2)w MRI scans (13% and 9%, respectively) compared with the CT scans. The urinary bladder was drawn smaller on the CT scans and the rectum was smaller on the MRI scans. On T(1)w MRI, the rectum and urinary bladder were delineated larger than on T(2)w MRI. Minimal agreement was observed between the CT and T(2)w images. The main spatial differences were measured in the superior and superolateral directions in which the CTV on the MRI scans was 1.8-2.9 mm smaller. In the posterior and inferior border, no difference was seen between the CT and T(1)w MRI scans. On the T(2)w MRI scans, the CTV was larger in these directions (by 1.3 and 1.7 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The use of MRI in postprostatectomy radiotherapy planning resulted in a reduction of the CTV. The main differences were found in the superior part of the prostate bed. We believe T(2)w MRI enables more precise definition of prostate bed CTV than conventional planning CT.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x metody $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a lokální recidiva nádoru $x krev $x patologie $x radiografie $x radioterapie $7 D009364
650    _2
$a reziduální nádor $7 D018365
650    _2
$a velikost orgánu $7 D009929
650    _2
$a kritické orgány $x anatomie a histologie $x radiografie $7 D058958
650    _2
$a pooperační období $7 D011184
650    _2
$a prostata $x anatomie a histologie $x radiografie $7 D011467
650    _2
$a prostatektomie $7 D011468
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x krev $x patologie $x radiografie $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D011471
650    _2
$a plánování radioterapie pomocí počítače $x metody $7 D011880
650    _2
$a adjuvantní radioterapie $x metody $7 D018714
650    _2
$a rektum $x anatomie a histologie $x radiografie $7 D012007
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a záchranná terapie $x metody $7 D016879
650    _2
$a semenné váčky $x anatomie a histologie $x radiografie $7 D012669
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
650    _2
$a tumor burden $7 D047368
650    _2
$a močový měchýř $x anatomie a histologie $x radiografie $7 D001743
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Odrážka, Karel $7 mzk2002148290
700    1_
$a Paluska, Petr $7 xx0135658
700    1_
$a Bělobrádek, Zdeněk, $d 1952- $7 xx0095424
700    1_
$a Broďák, Miloš, $d 1968- $7 xx0079082
700    1_
$a Doležel, Martin $7 xx0075943
700    1_
$a Prošvic, Petr $7 xx0105369
700    1_
$a Mačingová, Zuzana $7 xx0093749
700    1_
$a Vošmik, Milan, $d 1972- $7 xx0135408
700    1_
$a Hoffmann, Petr $7 xx0106392
700    1_
$a Louda, Miroslav, $d 1968- $7 xx0037550
700    1_
$a Nejedlá, Anna
773    0_
$w MED00002371 $t International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $x 1879-355X $g Roč. 82, č. 2 (2012), s. 911-918
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21420244 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120806 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160425152620 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 944236 $s 779620
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 82 $c 2 $d 911-918 $i 1879-355X $m International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics $n Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys $x MED00002371
LZP    __
$b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20120806/12/01

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...