-
Something wrong with this record ?
Biomass waste gasification - can be the two stage process suitable for tar reduction and power generation?
J. Sulc, J. Stojdl, M. Richter, J. Popelka, K. Svoboda, J. Smetana, J. Vacek, S. Skoblja, P. Buryan
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Biomass MeSH
- Tars chemistry MeSH
- Electricity MeSH
- Refuse Disposal instrumentation methods MeSH
- Pilot Projects MeSH
- Gases chemistry MeSH
- Hot Temperature MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
A pilot scale gasification unit with novel co-current, updraft arrangement in the first stage and counter-current downdraft in the second stage was developed and exploited for studying effects of two stage gasification in comparison with one stage gasification of biomass (wood pellets) on fuel gas composition and attainable gas purity. Significant producer gas parameters (gas composition, heating value, content of tar compounds, content of inorganic gas impurities) were compared for the two stage and the one stage method of the gasification arrangement with only the upward moving bed (co-current updraft). The main novel features of the gasifier conception include grate-less reactor, upward moving bed of biomass particles (e.g. pellets) by means of a screw elevator with changeable rotational speed and gradual expanding diameter of the cylindrical reactor in the part above the upper end of the screw. The gasifier concept and arrangement are considered convenient for thermal power range 100-350 kW(th). The second stage of the gasifier served mainly for tar compounds destruction/reforming by increased temperature (around 950°C) and for gasification reaction of the fuel gas with char. The second stage used additional combustion of the fuel gas by preheated secondary air for attaining higher temperature and faster gasification of the remaining char from the first stage. The measurements of gas composition and tar compound contents confirmed superiority of the two stage gasification system, drastic decrease of aromatic compounds with two and higher number of benzene rings by 1-2 orders. On the other hand the two stage gasification (with overall ER=0.71) led to substantial reduction of gas heating value (LHV=3.15 MJ/Nm(3)), elevation of gas volume and increase of nitrogen content in fuel gas. The increased temperature (>950°C) at the entrance to the char bed caused also substantial decrease of ammonia content in fuel gas. The char with higher content of ash leaving the second stage presented only few mass% of the inlet biomass stream.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12024359
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130607202148.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120815s2012 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.08.015 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21925858
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Šulc, Jindřich $u Faculty of the Environment, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Králova Výšina 7, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Biomass waste gasification - can be the two stage process suitable for tar reduction and power generation? / $c J. Sulc, J. Stojdl, M. Richter, J. Popelka, K. Svoboda, J. Smetana, J. Vacek, S. Skoblja, P. Buryan
- 520 9_
- $a A pilot scale gasification unit with novel co-current, updraft arrangement in the first stage and counter-current downdraft in the second stage was developed and exploited for studying effects of two stage gasification in comparison with one stage gasification of biomass (wood pellets) on fuel gas composition and attainable gas purity. Significant producer gas parameters (gas composition, heating value, content of tar compounds, content of inorganic gas impurities) were compared for the two stage and the one stage method of the gasification arrangement with only the upward moving bed (co-current updraft). The main novel features of the gasifier conception include grate-less reactor, upward moving bed of biomass particles (e.g. pellets) by means of a screw elevator with changeable rotational speed and gradual expanding diameter of the cylindrical reactor in the part above the upper end of the screw. The gasifier concept and arrangement are considered convenient for thermal power range 100-350 kW(th). The second stage of the gasifier served mainly for tar compounds destruction/reforming by increased temperature (around 950°C) and for gasification reaction of the fuel gas with char. The second stage used additional combustion of the fuel gas by preheated secondary air for attaining higher temperature and faster gasification of the remaining char from the first stage. The measurements of gas composition and tar compound contents confirmed superiority of the two stage gasification system, drastic decrease of aromatic compounds with two and higher number of benzene rings by 1-2 orders. On the other hand the two stage gasification (with overall ER=0.71) led to substantial reduction of gas heating value (LHV=3.15 MJ/Nm(3)), elevation of gas volume and increase of nitrogen content in fuel gas. The increased temperature (>950°C) at the entrance to the char bed caused also substantial decrease of ammonia content in fuel gas. The char with higher content of ash leaving the second stage presented only few mass% of the inlet biomass stream.
- 650 _2
- $a biomasa $7 D018533
- 650 _2
- $a elektřina $7 D004560
- 650 _2
- $a plyny $x chemie $7 D005740
- 650 _2
- $a vysoká teplota $7 D006358
- 650 _2
- $a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
- 650 _2
- $a odpadky - odstraňování $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D012037
- 650 _2
- $a dehty $x chemie $7 D013638
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Štojdl, Jiří
- 700 1_
- $a Richter, Miroslav
- 700 1_
- $a Popelka, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Svoboda, Karel
- 700 1_
- $a Smetana, Jiří
- 700 1_
- $a Vacek, Jiří
- 700 1_
- $a Skoblja, Siarhei
- 700 1_
- $a Buryan, Petr
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006459 $t Waste management (New York, N.Y.) $x 1879-2456 $g Roč. 32, č. 4 (2012), s. 692-700
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21925858 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120815 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130607202540 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 946507 $s 781687
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 32 $c 4 $d 692-700 $i 1879-2456 $m Waste management $n Waste Manag $x MED00006459
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120815/12/02