• Something wrong with this record ?

Biomass waste gasification - can be the two stage process suitable for tar reduction and power generation?

J. Sulc, J. Stojdl, M. Richter, J. Popelka, K. Svoboda, J. Smetana, J. Vacek, S. Skoblja, P. Buryan

. 2012 ; 32 (4) : 692-700.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

A pilot scale gasification unit with novel co-current, updraft arrangement in the first stage and counter-current downdraft in the second stage was developed and exploited for studying effects of two stage gasification in comparison with one stage gasification of biomass (wood pellets) on fuel gas composition and attainable gas purity. Significant producer gas parameters (gas composition, heating value, content of tar compounds, content of inorganic gas impurities) were compared for the two stage and the one stage method of the gasification arrangement with only the upward moving bed (co-current updraft). The main novel features of the gasifier conception include grate-less reactor, upward moving bed of biomass particles (e.g. pellets) by means of a screw elevator with changeable rotational speed and gradual expanding diameter of the cylindrical reactor in the part above the upper end of the screw. The gasifier concept and arrangement are considered convenient for thermal power range 100-350 kW(th). The second stage of the gasifier served mainly for tar compounds destruction/reforming by increased temperature (around 950°C) and for gasification reaction of the fuel gas with char. The second stage used additional combustion of the fuel gas by preheated secondary air for attaining higher temperature and faster gasification of the remaining char from the first stage. The measurements of gas composition and tar compound contents confirmed superiority of the two stage gasification system, drastic decrease of aromatic compounds with two and higher number of benzene rings by 1-2 orders. On the other hand the two stage gasification (with overall ER=0.71) led to substantial reduction of gas heating value (LHV=3.15 MJ/Nm(3)), elevation of gas volume and increase of nitrogen content in fuel gas. The increased temperature (>950°C) at the entrance to the char bed caused also substantial decrease of ammonia content in fuel gas. The char with higher content of ash leaving the second stage presented only few mass% of the inlet biomass stream.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12024359
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130607202148.0
007      
ta
008      
120815s2012 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.08.015 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21925858
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šulc, Jindřich $u Faculty of the Environment, Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem, Králova Výšina 7, 400 96 Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Biomass waste gasification - can be the two stage process suitable for tar reduction and power generation? / $c J. Sulc, J. Stojdl, M. Richter, J. Popelka, K. Svoboda, J. Smetana, J. Vacek, S. Skoblja, P. Buryan
520    9_
$a A pilot scale gasification unit with novel co-current, updraft arrangement in the first stage and counter-current downdraft in the second stage was developed and exploited for studying effects of two stage gasification in comparison with one stage gasification of biomass (wood pellets) on fuel gas composition and attainable gas purity. Significant producer gas parameters (gas composition, heating value, content of tar compounds, content of inorganic gas impurities) were compared for the two stage and the one stage method of the gasification arrangement with only the upward moving bed (co-current updraft). The main novel features of the gasifier conception include grate-less reactor, upward moving bed of biomass particles (e.g. pellets) by means of a screw elevator with changeable rotational speed and gradual expanding diameter of the cylindrical reactor in the part above the upper end of the screw. The gasifier concept and arrangement are considered convenient for thermal power range 100-350 kW(th). The second stage of the gasifier served mainly for tar compounds destruction/reforming by increased temperature (around 950°C) and for gasification reaction of the fuel gas with char. The second stage used additional combustion of the fuel gas by preheated secondary air for attaining higher temperature and faster gasification of the remaining char from the first stage. The measurements of gas composition and tar compound contents confirmed superiority of the two stage gasification system, drastic decrease of aromatic compounds with two and higher number of benzene rings by 1-2 orders. On the other hand the two stage gasification (with overall ER=0.71) led to substantial reduction of gas heating value (LHV=3.15 MJ/Nm(3)), elevation of gas volume and increase of nitrogen content in fuel gas. The increased temperature (>950°C) at the entrance to the char bed caused also substantial decrease of ammonia content in fuel gas. The char with higher content of ash leaving the second stage presented only few mass% of the inlet biomass stream.
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a elektřina $7 D004560
650    _2
$a plyny $x chemie $7 D005740
650    _2
$a vysoká teplota $7 D006358
650    _2
$a pilotní projekty $7 D010865
650    _2
$a odpadky - odstraňování $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D012037
650    _2
$a dehty $x chemie $7 D013638
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Štojdl, Jiří
700    1_
$a Richter, Miroslav
700    1_
$a Popelka, Jan
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Karel
700    1_
$a Smetana, Jiří
700    1_
$a Vacek, Jiří
700    1_
$a Skoblja, Siarhei
700    1_
$a Buryan, Petr
773    0_
$w MED00006459 $t Waste management (New York, N.Y.) $x 1879-2456 $g Roč. 32, č. 4 (2012), s. 692-700
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21925858 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120815 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130607202540 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 946507 $s 781687
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 32 $c 4 $d 692-700 $i 1879-2456 $m Waste management $n Waste Manag $x MED00006459
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120815/12/02

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...