Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Intraoperative reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine during extreme lateral interbody fusion, a novel technique for spine surgery

M. Adamus, L. Hrabalek, T. Wanek, T. Gabrhelik, J. Zapletalova,

. 2011 ; 25 (5) : 716-20. [pub] 20110813

Language English Country Japan

Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NS9618 MZ0 CEP Register

PURPOSE: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) is a method for stabilization of the lumbar spine. Intraoperatively, the surgeon identifies the lumbar nerve roots with a stimulator to prevent their injury. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which shallow rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block must be intraoperatively reversed for reliable identification of nerve roots. METHODS: General anesthesia (midazolam-propofol-sufentanil-oxygen/air/sevoflurane-rocuronium) was administered to all patients. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve at 15-s intervals and electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle were used. During operation, the surgeon stimulated the lumbar nerve roots (5-10 mA) to identify their course. At the appearance of two twitches to the TOF stimuli, sugammadex (2 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.04 mg/kg) was administered. When the response to nerve root stimulation appeared, the TOF ratio was recorded. RESULTS: When the response to nerve root stimulation with 10 mA became detectable, the median (range) TOF ratios were 0.67 (0.50-0.81) and 0.65 (0.42-0.71) after sugammadex and neostigmine, respectively. Similarly, TOF ratios at the first detectable response to stimulation with 5 mA were 0.88 (0.67-0.93) and 0.83 (0.61-0.93). After sugammadex and neostigmine, the respective intervals until TOF ratio ≥0.90 were 2.0 (0.8-3.3) and 15.9 (7.3-28.8) min. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative reversal of shallow rocuronium-induced block with either sugammadex or neostigmine is an efficient method. For reliable detection of lumbar nerve roots with a stimulating current of 10 mA, the block should be reversed to a TOF ratio of at least 0.70. For a current intensity of 5 mA, the TOF ratio should reach 0.90.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12024388
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20141013120359.0
007      
ta
008      
120815e20110813ja f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00540-011-1209-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21842171
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ja
100    1_
$a Adamus, Milan $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, I. P. Pavlova 6, 775 20, Olomouc, Czech Republic. milan.adamus@seznam.cz $7 xx0041551
245    10
$a Intraoperative reversal of neuromuscular block with sugammadex or neostigmine during extreme lateral interbody fusion, a novel technique for spine surgery / $c M. Adamus, L. Hrabalek, T. Wanek, T. Gabrhelik, J. Zapletalova,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) is a method for stabilization of the lumbar spine. Intraoperatively, the surgeon identifies the lumbar nerve roots with a stimulator to prevent their injury. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which shallow rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block must be intraoperatively reversed for reliable identification of nerve roots. METHODS: General anesthesia (midazolam-propofol-sufentanil-oxygen/air/sevoflurane-rocuronium) was administered to all patients. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation of the ulnar nerve at 15-s intervals and electromyographic response of the adductor pollicis muscle were used. During operation, the surgeon stimulated the lumbar nerve roots (5-10 mA) to identify their course. At the appearance of two twitches to the TOF stimuli, sugammadex (2 mg/kg) or neostigmine (0.04 mg/kg) was administered. When the response to nerve root stimulation appeared, the TOF ratio was recorded. RESULTS: When the response to nerve root stimulation with 10 mA became detectable, the median (range) TOF ratios were 0.67 (0.50-0.81) and 0.65 (0.42-0.71) after sugammadex and neostigmine, respectively. Similarly, TOF ratios at the first detectable response to stimulation with 5 mA were 0.88 (0.67-0.93) and 0.83 (0.61-0.93). After sugammadex and neostigmine, the respective intervals until TOF ratio ≥0.90 were 2.0 (0.8-3.3) and 15.9 (7.3-28.8) min. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative reversal of shallow rocuronium-induced block with either sugammadex or neostigmine is an efficient method. For reliable detection of lumbar nerve roots with a stimulating current of 10 mA, the block should be reversed to a TOF ratio of at least 0.70. For a current intensity of 5 mA, the TOF ratio should reach 0.90.
650    _2
$a androstanoly $x farmakologie $7 D000732
650    _2
$a probouzení z anestezie $7 D000762
650    _2
$a celková anestezie $x metody $7 D000768
650    _2
$a cholinesterasové inhibitory $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D002800
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a peroperační doba $7 D007432
650    _2
$a lumbosakrální krajina $x chirurgie $7 D008161
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a neostigmin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D009388
650    _2
$a nervosvalová blokáda $x metody $7 D019148
650    _2
$a nedepolarizující myorelaxancia $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D003473
650    _2
$a fúze páteře $x metody $7 D013123
650    _2
$a míšní kořeny $x účinky léků $7 D013126
650    _2
$a páteř $x chirurgie $7 D013131
650    _2
$a gama-cyklodextriny $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D047408
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hrabalek, Lumir
700    1_
$a Wanek, Tomas
700    1_
$a Gabrhelik, Tomas
700    1_
$a Zapletalova, Jana
773    0_
$w MED00005749 $t Journal of anesthesia $x 1438-8359 $g Roč. 25, č. 5 (20110813), s. 716-20
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21842171 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120815 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20141013120751 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 946536 $s 781716
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 25 $c 5 $d 716-20 $e 20110813 $i 1438-8359 $m Journal of anesthesia $n J Anesth $x MED00005749
GRA    __
$a NS9618 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120815/12/02

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...