-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Basophil activation can predict clinical sensitivity in patients after venom immunotherapy
P. Kucera, M. Cvackova, K. Hulikova, O. Juzova, J. Pachl
Jazyk angličtina Země Španělsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
20461965
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- alergeny imunologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- anafylaxe diagnóza imunologie terapie MeSH
- antigeny CD63 MeSH
- bazofily imunologie metabolismus patologie MeSH
- biologické markery metabolismus MeSH
- CD antigeny imunologie metabolismus MeSH
- desenzibilizace imunologická MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- glykoproteiny membrány trombocytů imunologie metabolismus MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prediktivní hodnota testů MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- separace buněk MeSH
- test degranulace bazofilů MeSH
- včelí jedy imunologie terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
OBJECTIVE: At present, no reliable in vitro test is available to monitor the success of specific venom immunotherapy (VIT) in preventing insect venom anaphylaxis. We investigated usefulness of the basophil activation test (BAT) in predicting the outcome of sting challenge in bee venom-allergic patients after VIT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with bee venom anaphylaxis at the end of VIT and 6 control participants were enrolled. BAT (flow-cytometric evaluation of allergen-induced expression of CD63), skin testing, and specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E determination were performed prior to sting challenge. RESULTS: Five of the 21 patients (23.8%) reacted to sting challenge. At a bee venom concentration of 100 ng/mL, the mean proportion of basophils expressing CD63 was 56% in reactors and 13.2% in nonreactors (P = .0321). Four of the 5 reactors had positive results and 14 of the 16 nonreactors had negative results. Thus, using 18.4% and 21.6% (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) as the cutoff for expression of the CD63 marker, the positive and the negative predictive values were 67% and 93%, respectively, and specificity and sensitivity for BAT were 80% and 83%, respectively. However, at a concentration of 1000 ng/mL, no significant differences in basophil activation were observed between reactors and nonreactors. CONCLUSION: We found BAT to be a helpful tool in predicting the clinical sensitivity of bee venom-allergic patients after VIT (correlation between BAT at submaximal venom concentration and sting challenge).
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025078
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130207200201.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2010 sp f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20461965
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sp
- 100 1_
- $a Kučera, Petr, $d 1957- $7 xx0070805 $u Department of Immunology, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. kucera@fnkv.cz
- 245 10
- $a Basophil activation can predict clinical sensitivity in patients after venom immunotherapy / $c P. Kucera, M. Cvackova, K. Hulikova, O. Juzova, J. Pachl
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: At present, no reliable in vitro test is available to monitor the success of specific venom immunotherapy (VIT) in preventing insect venom anaphylaxis. We investigated usefulness of the basophil activation test (BAT) in predicting the outcome of sting challenge in bee venom-allergic patients after VIT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients with bee venom anaphylaxis at the end of VIT and 6 control participants were enrolled. BAT (flow-cytometric evaluation of allergen-induced expression of CD63), skin testing, and specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E determination were performed prior to sting challenge. RESULTS: Five of the 21 patients (23.8%) reacted to sting challenge. At a bee venom concentration of 100 ng/mL, the mean proportion of basophils expressing CD63 was 56% in reactors and 13.2% in nonreactors (P = .0321). Four of the 5 reactors had positive results and 14 of the 16 nonreactors had negative results. Thus, using 18.4% and 21.6% (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis) as the cutoff for expression of the CD63 marker, the positive and the negative predictive values were 67% and 93%, respectively, and specificity and sensitivity for BAT were 80% and 83%, respectively. However, at a concentration of 1000 ng/mL, no significant differences in basophil activation were observed between reactors and nonreactors. CONCLUSION: We found BAT to be a helpful tool in predicting the clinical sensitivity of bee venom-allergic patients after VIT (correlation between BAT at submaximal venom concentration and sting challenge).
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a alergeny $x imunologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000485
- 650 _2
- $a anafylaxe $x diagnóza $x imunologie $x terapie $7 D000707
- 650 _2
- $a CD antigeny $x imunologie $x metabolismus $7 D015703
- 650 _2
- $a antigeny CD63 $7 D060149
- 650 _2
- $a test degranulace bazofilů $7 D015549
- 650 _2
- $a bazofily $x imunologie $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D001491
- 650 _2
- $a včelí jedy $x imunologie $x terapeutické užití $7 D001514
- 650 _2
- $a biologické markery $x metabolismus $7 D015415
- 650 _2
- $a separace buněk $7 D002469
- 650 _2
- $a desenzibilizace imunologická $7 D003888
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a průtoková cytometrie $7 D005434
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a glykoproteiny membrány trombocytů $x imunologie $x metabolismus $7 D010980
- 650 _2
- $a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Cvačková, Milada $7 xx0099541
- 700 1#
- $a Hulíková, Katarína. $7 _AN043256
- 700 1#
- $a Jůzová, Olga. $7 xx0302370
- 700 1_
- $a Pachl, Jan, $d 1949- $7 nlk19990073644
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002755 $t Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology : official organ of the International Association of Asthmology (INTERASMA) and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Alergia e Inmunología $x 1018-9068 $g Roč. 20, č. 2 (2010), s. 110-116
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20461965 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130207200350 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 947120 $s 782424
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 20 $c 2 $d 110-116 $i 1018-9068 $m Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology $n J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol $x MED00002755
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120816/10/02