-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Ecotoxicity of wastes in avoidance tests with Enchytraeus albidus, Enchytraeus crypticus and Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta)
K. Kobetičová, J. Hofman, I. Holoubek
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- biotest metody MeSH
- druhová specificita MeSH
- ekotoxikologie metody MeSH
- látky znečišťující životní prostředí analýza toxicita MeSH
- monitorování životního prostředí metody MeSH
- Oligochaeta klasifikace účinky léků fyziologie MeSH
- průmyslový odpad škodlivé účinky analýza MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- rozmnožování účinky léků fyziologie MeSH
- studie proveditelnosti MeSH
- tělesná hmotnost účinky léků MeSH
- testy toxicity metody MeSH
- učení vyhýbat se účinky léků fyziologie MeSH
- vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Contact bioassays are important for testing the ecotoxicity of solid materials. However, survival and reproduction tests are often not practical due to their duration which may last for several weeks. Avoidance tests with soil invertebrates may offer an alternative or extension to the classic test batteries due to their short duration (days rather than weeks) and due to a sensitive sub-acute endpoint (behavior). The aims of our study were: (a) to evaluate the effects of three solid industrial wastes (incineration ash, contaminated wood chips and contaminated soil) on three Oligochaeta species (enchytraeids Enchytraeusalbidus, Enchytraeus crypticus and earthworm Eisenia fetida) in avoidance tests; (b) to compare the sensitivity among the species and to compare results of avoidance test to reproduction tests; (c) to elucidate if measuring the weight in the earthworm avoidance test could be reasonable additional endpoint. Avoidance mostly increased with the increasing percent of waste in the mixture showing a dose-response curve. E. fetida was the most sensitive species and E. crypticus the least one. An additional endpoint, (changes in weight after two-day exposure) was not found to be more sensitive than avoidance reaction, but it confirmed that earthworms staying in the highest concentrations of the waste mixture were affected showing apparent weight reduction. Our results indicate that avoidance tests with earthworms and enchytraeids are feasible for waste testing.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025330
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130228215543.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2010 xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.11.024 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20042324
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kobetičová, Klára $7 xx0115039 $u Research Centre for Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology (RECETOX), Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Kamenice 126/3, Brno CZ-62500, Czech Republic. kobeticova@recetox.muni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Ecotoxicity of wastes in avoidance tests with Enchytraeus albidus, Enchytraeus crypticus and Eisenia fetida (Oligochaeta) / $c K. Kobetičová, J. Hofman, I. Holoubek
- 520 9_
- $a Contact bioassays are important for testing the ecotoxicity of solid materials. However, survival and reproduction tests are often not practical due to their duration which may last for several weeks. Avoidance tests with soil invertebrates may offer an alternative or extension to the classic test batteries due to their short duration (days rather than weeks) and due to a sensitive sub-acute endpoint (behavior). The aims of our study were: (a) to evaluate the effects of three solid industrial wastes (incineration ash, contaminated wood chips and contaminated soil) on three Oligochaeta species (enchytraeids Enchytraeusalbidus, Enchytraeus crypticus and earthworm Eisenia fetida) in avoidance tests; (b) to compare the sensitivity among the species and to compare results of avoidance test to reproduction tests; (c) to elucidate if measuring the weight in the earthworm avoidance test could be reasonable additional endpoint. Avoidance mostly increased with the increasing percent of waste in the mixture showing a dose-response curve. E. fetida was the most sensitive species and E. crypticus the least one. An additional endpoint, (changes in weight after two-day exposure) was not found to be more sensitive than avoidance reaction, but it confirmed that earthworms staying in the highest concentrations of the waste mixture were affected showing apparent weight reduction. Our results indicate that avoidance tests with earthworms and enchytraeids are feasible for waste testing.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a učení vyhýbat se $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D001362
- 650 _2
- $a biotest $x metody $7 D001681
- 650 _2
- $a tělesná hmotnost $x účinky léků $7 D001835
- 650 _2
- $a vztah mezi dávkou a účinkem léčiva $7 D004305
- 650 _2
- $a ekotoxikologie $x metody $7 D054750
- 650 _2
- $a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
- 650 _2
- $a látky znečišťující životní prostředí $x analýza $x toxicita $7 D004785
- 650 _2
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 _2
- $a průmyslový odpad $x škodlivé účinky $x analýza $7 D007220
- 650 _2
- $a Oligochaeta $x klasifikace $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D009835
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a rozmnožování $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D012098
- 650 _2
- $a druhová specificita $7 D013045
- 650 _2
- $a testy toxicity $x metody $7 D018675
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Hofman, Jakub, $d 1974- $7 xx0106931
- 700 1_
- $a Holoubek, Ivan, $d 1951- $7 mzk2002140176
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006459 $t Waste management (New York, N.Y.) $x 1879-2456 $g Roč. 30, č. 4 (2010), s. 558-564
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20042324 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130228215808 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 947372 $s 782676
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 30 $c 4 $d 558-564 $i 1879-2456 $m Waste management $n Waste Manag $x MED00006459
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120816/10/02