Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

TVT and TVT-O for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence: prospective randomized trial

L. Krofta, J. Feyereisl, M. Otcenásek, P. Velebil, E. Kasíková, M. Krcmár

. 2010 ; 21 (2) : 141-148.

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12025472

Grantová podpora
NR9309 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Část
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-01-01 do 2017-12-31
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2010-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-01-01 do 2017-12-31

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: A study was conducted to compare the efficacy and complications of TVT and TVT-O. METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized trial involving 300 women with primary SUI; 149 received TVT, and 151 patients were treated with TVT-O. At the 1 year follow-up, 141 TVT patients and 147 TVT-O patients (dropout, 5.3% and 2.6%) were evaluated using urodynamic studies, validated questionnaires, and a 1-h pad test. RESULTS: The mean operating time was shorter in the TVT-O group (p < 0.001). Urinary retention was not significantly different (p > 0.05). Inner thigh discomfort was reported by 5.4% of TVT-O patients. In the TVT and the TVT-O groups, respectively, 90.1% and 88.4% women were objectively cured. The satisfaction with the surgical outcome reflects the significant decrease in the questionnaire mean symptom scores in both groups. Postoperative de novo urgency was significantly more common in the TVT-O patients (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The groups showed comparable objective and subjective cure rates.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12025472
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20220520214323.0
007      
ta
008      
120816s2010 xxk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00192-009-1027-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)19907913
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Krofta, Ladislav, $7 xx0082042 $u Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Podolske nabrezi 157, 147 00, Prague 4, Czech Republic. ladislav.krofta@post.cz $d 1967-
245    10
$a TVT and TVT-O for surgical treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence: prospective randomized trial / $c L. Krofta, J. Feyereisl, M. Otcenásek, P. Velebil, E. Kasíková, M. Krcmár
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: A study was conducted to compare the efficacy and complications of TVT and TVT-O. METHODS: This study is a prospective randomized trial involving 300 women with primary SUI; 149 received TVT, and 151 patients were treated with TVT-O. At the 1 year follow-up, 141 TVT patients and 147 TVT-O patients (dropout, 5.3% and 2.6%) were evaluated using urodynamic studies, validated questionnaires, and a 1-h pad test. RESULTS: The mean operating time was shorter in the TVT-O group (p < 0.001). Urinary retention was not significantly different (p > 0.05). Inner thigh discomfort was reported by 5.4% of TVT-O patients. In the TVT and the TVT-O groups, respectively, 90.1% and 88.4% women were objectively cured. The satisfaction with the surgical outcome reflects the significant decrease in the questionnaire mean symptom scores in both groups. Postoperative de novo urgency was significantly more common in the TVT-O patients (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The groups showed comparable objective and subjective cure rates.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a suburetrální pásky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D053825
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a stresová inkontinence moči $x chirurgie $7 D014550
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Feyereisl, Jaroslav, $d 1954- $7 nlk20010093266
700    1_
$a Otčenášek, Michal $7 xx0150802
700    1_
$a Velebil, Petr, $d 1956- $7 nlk20040147059
700    1_
$a Kašíková, Eva $7 xx0081265
700    1_
$a Krčmář, Michal $7 xx0083020
773    0_
$w MED00002395 $t International urogynecology journal $x 1433-3023 $g Roč. 21, č. 2 (2010), s. 141-148
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19907913 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120816 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20220520214316 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 947514 $s 782818
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2010 $b 21 $c 2 $d 141-148 $i 1433-3023 $m International urogynecology journal $n Int. urogynecol. j. (Print) $x MED00002395
GRA    __
$a NR9309 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120816/10/02

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...