-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Occurrence of adventitious sprouting in short-lived monocarpic herbs: a field study of 22 weedy species
L. Malíková, P. Šmilauer, J. Klimešová
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Europe PubMed Central
od 1995 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1993-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
20356953
DOI
10.1093/aob/mcq069
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- biodiverzita MeSH
- dusík farmakologie MeSH
- hypokotyl MeSH
- kořeny rostlin růst a vývoj MeSH
- půda analýza MeSH
- transpirace rostlin MeSH
- výhonky rostlin účinky léků růst a vývoj fyziologie MeSH
- životní prostředí MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adventitious sprouting from the hypocotyle and roots in monocarpic herbs has been confirmed in previous experimental studies as a means to avoid bud limitation after severe injury in annual and biennial plants. Data regarding the role of adventitious sprouting in natural populations, however, were lacking. The aim of the present study was to assess whether adventitious sprouting occurs in natural populations and how it is affected by plant size, plant injury, plant cover and environmental characteristics. METHODS: Data were sampled from 14 037 individual plants from 389 populations belonging to 22 annual and biennial species. Growth parameters were measured in individual plants, species composition and plant cover in communities were evaluated, and environmental characteristics were estimated using Ellenberg indicator values. KEY RESULTS: It was confirmed that adventitious sprouting occurs in natural populations of all but five species examined. Adventitious sprouting was positively affected by plant size and plant injury. Environmental factors including availability of soil nitrogen were not shown to affect adventitious sprouting. Annual and biennial plants did not differ in sprouting, but upright annuals had a lower number of and longer adventitious shoots than prostrate annuals. CONCLUSIONS: Adventitious bud formation is used to overcome meristem limitation when stem parts are lost due to injury, and thus resprouting in short-lived monocarps should not be overlooked.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025833
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130317160412.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817e20100331enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/aob/mcq069 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20356953
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Malíková, Lenka $u Institute of Botany ASCR, Dukelská 135, Trebon, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Occurrence of adventitious sprouting in short-lived monocarpic herbs: a field study of 22 weedy species / $c L. Malíková, P. Šmilauer, J. Klimešová
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adventitious sprouting from the hypocotyle and roots in monocarpic herbs has been confirmed in previous experimental studies as a means to avoid bud limitation after severe injury in annual and biennial plants. Data regarding the role of adventitious sprouting in natural populations, however, were lacking. The aim of the present study was to assess whether adventitious sprouting occurs in natural populations and how it is affected by plant size, plant injury, plant cover and environmental characteristics. METHODS: Data were sampled from 14 037 individual plants from 389 populations belonging to 22 annual and biennial species. Growth parameters were measured in individual plants, species composition and plant cover in communities were evaluated, and environmental characteristics were estimated using Ellenberg indicator values. KEY RESULTS: It was confirmed that adventitious sprouting occurs in natural populations of all but five species examined. Adventitious sprouting was positively affected by plant size and plant injury. Environmental factors including availability of soil nitrogen were not shown to affect adventitious sprouting. Annual and biennial plants did not differ in sprouting, but upright annuals had a lower number of and longer adventitious shoots than prostrate annuals. CONCLUSIONS: Adventitious bud formation is used to overcome meristem limitation when stem parts are lost due to injury, and thus resprouting in short-lived monocarps should not be overlooked.
- 650 _2
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a životní prostředí $7 D004777
- 650 _2
- $a hypokotyl $7 D018546
- 650 _2
- $a dusík $x farmakologie $7 D009584
- 650 _2
- $a kořeny rostlin $x růst a vývoj $7 D018517
- 650 _2
- $a výhonky rostlin $x účinky léků $x růst a vývoj $x fyziologie $7 D018520
- 650 _2
- $a transpirace rostlin $7 D018526
- 650 _2
- $a půda $x analýza $7 D012987
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Šmilauer, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Klimešová, Jitka
- 773 0_
- $w MED00000419 $t Annals of botany $x 1095-8290 $g Roč. 105, č. 6 (20100331), s. 905-912
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20356953 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130317160644 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 947875 $s 783179
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 105 $c 6 $d 905-912 $e 20100331 $i 1095-8290 $m Annals of botany $n Ann. bot. (Print) $x MED00000419
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/03