-
Something wrong with this record ?
Tits use amodal completion in predator recognition: a field experiment
K. Tvardíková, R. Fuchs
Language English Country Germany
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1998-07-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2003-06-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1998-07-01 to 1 year ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
from 1998-07-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Behavior, Animal MeSH
- Statistics, Nonparametric MeSH
- Perceptual Closure MeSH
- Predatory Behavior MeSH
- Recognition, Psychology MeSH
- Form Perception MeSH
- Songbirds MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Amodal completion enables an animal to perceive partly concealed objects as an entirety, and to interact with them appropriately. Several studies, based upon either operant conditioning or filial imprinting techniques, have shown that various animals (both mammals and birds) can perform amodal completion. Before this study, the use of amodal completion by untrained animals in the recognition of objects had not been considered. Using two feeders, we observed in a field experiment the reaction of tits to the torso of a sparrowhawk (partly occluded or an 'amputated' dummy) in two different treatments (sparrowhawk torso vs. complete dummy pigeon; and torso vs. complete dummy sparrowhawk). It is clear that the birds considered the two torso variants as predators and kept away from both of them when the second feeder offered a 'pigeon' instead. On the other hand, when a 'complete sparrowhawk' was present on the second feeder, the number of visits to the occluded torso remained low; while the number of visits to the amputated one increased threefold. Birds risked perching near what was clearly an amputated torso; while the fear of a "hiding" (occluded) torso remained unchanged, when the second feeder did not provide a safe alternative. Such discrimination between torsos requires the ability for amodal completion. Our results demonstrate that in their recognition process, the birds not only use simple sign stimuli, but also complex cognitive functions.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12025940
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130317155307.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817e20100204gw f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10071-010-0311-3 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20130944
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Tvardíková, Katerina $u Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Science, University of South Bohemia, Branisovská 31, 370 05 Ceské Budejovice, Czech Republic. katerinatvardikova@seznam.cz
- 245 10
- $a Tits use amodal completion in predator recognition: a field experiment / $c K. Tvardíková, R. Fuchs
- 520 9_
- $a Amodal completion enables an animal to perceive partly concealed objects as an entirety, and to interact with them appropriately. Several studies, based upon either operant conditioning or filial imprinting techniques, have shown that various animals (both mammals and birds) can perform amodal completion. Before this study, the use of amodal completion by untrained animals in the recognition of objects had not been considered. Using two feeders, we observed in a field experiment the reaction of tits to the torso of a sparrowhawk (partly occluded or an 'amputated' dummy) in two different treatments (sparrowhawk torso vs. complete dummy pigeon; and torso vs. complete dummy sparrowhawk). It is clear that the birds considered the two torso variants as predators and kept away from both of them when the second feeder offered a 'pigeon' instead. On the other hand, when a 'complete sparrowhawk' was present on the second feeder, the number of visits to the occluded torso remained low; while the number of visits to the amputated one increased threefold. Birds risked perching near what was clearly an amputated torso; while the fear of a "hiding" (occluded) torso remained unchanged, when the second feeder did not provide a safe alternative. Such discrimination between torsos requires the ability for amodal completion. Our results demonstrate that in their recognition process, the birds not only use simple sign stimuli, but also complex cognitive functions.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a chování zvířat $7 D001522
- 650 _2
- $a vnímání tvaru $7 D005556
- 650 _2
- $a percepční uzavřenost $7 D010466
- 650 _2
- $a predátorské chování $7 D011235
- 650 _2
- $a rozpoznávání (psychologie) $7 D021641
- 650 _2
- $a zpěvní ptáci $7 D020308
- 650 _2
- $a neparametrická statistika $7 D018709
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Fuchs, Roman
- 773 0_
- $w MED00179774 $t Animal cognition $x 1435-9456 $g Roč. 13, č. 4 (20100204), s. 609-615
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20130944 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130317155539 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 947982 $s 783286
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2010 $b 13 $c 4 $d 609-615 $e 20100204 $i 1435-9456 $m Animal cognition $n Anim Cogn $x MED00179774
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/10/03