-
Something wrong with this record ?
Characterization of new R-naphthylethyl cyclofructan 6 chiral stationary phase and its comparison with R-naphthylethyl β-cyclodextrin-based column
K. Kalíková, L. Janečková, D. W. Armstrong, E. Tesařová
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- beta-Cyclodextrins chemistry MeSH
- Models, Chemical MeSH
- Chromatography, Liquid methods MeSH
- Fructans chemistry MeSH
- Naphthalenes chemistry MeSH
- Regression Analysis MeSH
- Stereoisomerism MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Derivatized cyclofructans have been recently introduced as a new class of chiral selectors with great application potential. In this study, a R-naphthylethyl-functionalized cyclofructan 6 based chiral stationary phase (RN CF6 CSP) was used for separation of substituted binaphthyl catalysts in the normal phase HPLC mode. Dominant interaction types that play a role in the separation mechanism were revealed by a linear free energy relationship (LFER) method. In order to evaluate the contribution of the substituent on the cyclofructan structure to retention, the R-naphthylethyl-functionalized β-cyclodextrin (RN CD) CSP was chosen for comparison. Retention factors of 46 widely different solutes, with known solvation parameters, were determined on each of the columns under the same mobile phase compositions used for the enantiomeric separations. The LFER results showed that hydrogen bond acidity and polarity/polarizibility have the greatest impact on retention and enantioresolution on the RN CF6 CSP. The equal influence of the naphthylethyl substituent on the both CSPs was also confirmed while the effects of the basic cyclofructan versus cyclodextrin structures were different. The addition of trifluoroacetic acid to the hexane/propane-2-ol mobile phase was negligible on the RN CF6 CSP for the majority of atropoisomers except for one with ionizable functional groups. The RN CF6 column was shown to be more suitable for enantioseparation of the binaphthyl catalysts than the RN CD column. Higher retention offered by the latter CSP had no positive effect on the enantioresolution.
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry The University of Texas at Arlington Arlington TX 76019 USA
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027073
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160502072505.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2011 ne f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.chroma.2011.01.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21292272
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kalíková, Květa $7 _BN007306 $u Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 2030, 12843 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Characterization of new R-naphthylethyl cyclofructan 6 chiral stationary phase and its comparison with R-naphthylethyl β-cyclodextrin-based column / $c K. Kalíková, L. Janečková, D. W. Armstrong, E. Tesařová
- 520 9_
- $a Derivatized cyclofructans have been recently introduced as a new class of chiral selectors with great application potential. In this study, a R-naphthylethyl-functionalized cyclofructan 6 based chiral stationary phase (RN CF6 CSP) was used for separation of substituted binaphthyl catalysts in the normal phase HPLC mode. Dominant interaction types that play a role in the separation mechanism were revealed by a linear free energy relationship (LFER) method. In order to evaluate the contribution of the substituent on the cyclofructan structure to retention, the R-naphthylethyl-functionalized β-cyclodextrin (RN CD) CSP was chosen for comparison. Retention factors of 46 widely different solutes, with known solvation parameters, were determined on each of the columns under the same mobile phase compositions used for the enantiomeric separations. The LFER results showed that hydrogen bond acidity and polarity/polarizibility have the greatest impact on retention and enantioresolution on the RN CF6 CSP. The equal influence of the naphthylethyl substituent on the both CSPs was also confirmed while the effects of the basic cyclofructan versus cyclodextrin structures were different. The addition of trifluoroacetic acid to the hexane/propane-2-ol mobile phase was negligible on the RN CF6 CSP for the majority of atropoisomers except for one with ionizable functional groups. The RN CF6 column was shown to be more suitable for enantioseparation of the binaphthyl catalysts than the RN CD column. Higher retention offered by the latter CSP had no positive effect on the enantioresolution.
- 650 _2
- $a chromatografie kapalinová $x metody $7 D002853
- 650 _2
- $a fruktany $x chemie $7 D005630
- 650 _2
- $a chemické modely $7 D008956
- 650 _2
- $a naftaleny $x chemie $7 D009281
- 650 _2
- $a regresní analýza $7 D012044
- 650 _2
- $a stereoizomerie $7 D013237
- 650 _2
- $a beta-cyklodextriny $x chemie $7 D047392
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Janečková, Lucie $7 xx0283374 $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 2030, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Armstrong, Daniel W. $u Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA $7 gn_A_00008617
- 700 1_
- $a Tesařová, Eva $7 _BN007307 $u Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Albertov 2030, 128 43 Prague 2, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004962 $t Journal of chromatography. A $x 1873-3778 $g Roč. 1218, č. 10 (2011), s. 1393-1398
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21292272 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160502072608 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949115 $s 784419
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 1218 $c 10 $d 1393-1398 $e 20110115 $i 1873-3778 $m Journal of chromatography. A, Including electrophoresis and other separation methods $n J Chromatogr A $x MED00004962
- LZP __
- $b NLK122 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/02