-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Catheter ablation of electrical storm in patients with structural heart disease
M. Kozeluhova, P. Peichl, R. Cihak, D. Wichterle, V. Vancura, J. Bytesnik, J. Kautzner
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1999 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed Central
od 2008
Open Access Digital Library
od 1999-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1999-01-01
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
od 1999-01-01
PubMed
20947570
DOI
10.1093/europace/euq364
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dilatační kardiomyopatie komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- fibrilace komor epidemiologie mortalita chirurgie MeSH
- Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
- katetrizační ablace MeSH
- komorbidita MeSH
- komorová tachykardie epidemiologie mortalita chirurgie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- nemoci koronárních tepen komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- nemoci srdce komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srdeční arytmie komplikace epidemiologie MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
AIMS: Electrical storm (ES) adversely affects prognosis of patients and may become a life-threatening event. Catheter ablation (CA) has been proposed for the treatment of ES. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of CA ablation both in acute and long-term suppression of ES. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (38), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (5), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (6), and/or with combined aetiology (1) underwent CA for ES. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 29 ± 11%. All patients underwent electroanatomical mapping, and CA was performed to abolish all inducible ventricular arrhythmias. The ES was suppressed by CA in 84% of patients. During the follow-up of 18 ± 16 months, 24 patients had no recurrences of any ventricular tachycardia (VT; 48%). Repeated procedure was necessary to suppress the recurrent ES in 13 cases (26%). Statistical analysis revealed that low LVEF (22 ± 3 vs. 31 ± 12%; P < 0.001), increased LVend-diastolic diameter (72 ± 9.1 vs. 64 ± 8.9 mm; P = 0.0135), and renal insufficiency (P < 0.001) were the univariate predictors of early mortality or necessity for heart transplantation. Recurrence of ES despite previous CA procedure was associated with a higher risk of death or heart transplant during follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation is effective in acute suppression of ES and often represents a life-saving therapy. In the long term, it prevents recurrences of any VT in about half of the treated patients.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027320
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160302140727.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2011 enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/europace/euq364 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20947570
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Segeťová, Markéta $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Videnska 1958/9, Prague 4 140 21, Czech Republic. mrkz@ikem.cz $7 xx0141757
- 245 10
- $a Catheter ablation of electrical storm in patients with structural heart disease / $c M. Kozeluhova, P. Peichl, R. Cihak, D. Wichterle, V. Vancura, J. Bytesnik, J. Kautzner
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: Electrical storm (ES) adversely affects prognosis of patients and may become a life-threatening event. Catheter ablation (CA) has been proposed for the treatment of ES. Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of CA ablation both in acute and long-term suppression of ES. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty consecutive patients with coronary artery disease (38), idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (5), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (6), and/or with combined aetiology (1) underwent CA for ES. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 29 ± 11%. All patients underwent electroanatomical mapping, and CA was performed to abolish all inducible ventricular arrhythmias. The ES was suppressed by CA in 84% of patients. During the follow-up of 18 ± 16 months, 24 patients had no recurrences of any ventricular tachycardia (VT; 48%). Repeated procedure was necessary to suppress the recurrent ES in 13 cases (26%). Statistical analysis revealed that low LVEF (22 ± 3 vs. 31 ± 12%; P < 0.001), increased LVend-diastolic diameter (72 ± 9.1 vs. 64 ± 8.9 mm; P = 0.0135), and renal insufficiency (P < 0.001) were the univariate predictors of early mortality or necessity for heart transplantation. Recurrence of ES despite previous CA procedure was associated with a higher risk of death or heart transplant during follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation is effective in acute suppression of ES and often represents a life-saving therapy. In the long term, it prevents recurrences of any VT in about half of the treated patients.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a srdeční arytmie $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D001145
- 650 _2
- $a dilatační kardiomyopatie $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D002311
- 650 _2
- $a katetrizační ablace $7 D017115
- 650 _2
- $a komorbidita $7 D015897
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci koronárních tepen $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D003324
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci srdce $x komplikace $x epidemiologie $7 D006331
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a komorová tachykardie $x epidemiologie $x mortalita $x chirurgie $7 D017180
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a fibrilace komor $x epidemiologie $x mortalita $x chirurgie $7 D014693
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Peichl, Petr, $d 1976- $7 xx0092197 $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague 4, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Čihák, Robert $7 xx0061374 $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague 4, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Wichterle, Dan $7 xx0101417 $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague 4, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Vančura, Vlastimil $7 xx0060367 $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague 4, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Bytešník, Jan, $d 1947- $7 jn20000400328 $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague 4, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kautzner, Josef, $d 1957- $7 xx0037112
- 773 0_
- $w MED00149837 $t Europace European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology $x 1532-2092 $g Roč. 13, č. 1 (2011), s. 109-113
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20947570 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160302140445 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949362 $s 784666
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 13 $c 1 $d 109-113 $i 1532-2092 $m Europace $n Europace $x MED00149837
- LZP __
- $b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/02