-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Contraceptive behaviour of Czech and Romanian women: comparison of representative national samples
P. Gregorová, P. Weiss, V. Unzeitig, D. Cibula
Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články
- MeSH
- antikoncepce metody MeSH
- antikoncepční chování statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kondomy využití MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- těhotenství MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Rumunsko MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contraceptive behaviour of Czech and Romanian women and their attitudes towards different forms of contraception. STUDY DESIGN: Anonymous questionnaire research among 1011 Czech and 1001 Romanian women between 15 and 50 years of age. The samples were representative of both the Czech and Romanian female populations with respect to age, education and the size of their place of residence. RESULTS: The majority of women use contraception when in a stable sexual relationship. We found a higher percentage of women using contraception among Czech women. Romanian women more often use less reliable methods in a stable relationship, and condoms. Czech women use hormonal contraception much more. Women in the Czech Republic would more often agree to use a condom and, in particular, to use hormonal and intrauterine contraception. More Romanian women than Czech women prefer the method of infertile days. The use of contraception is influenced by the factors of age, education and size of the place of residence. CONCLUSION: The majority of Czech and Romanian women protect themselves against unwanted pregnancy. Czech women are more frequent users of contraceptives in general and, in particular, of hormonal contraception. Romanian women tend to use less reliable methods of contraception but on the other hand, they more often use condoms as a means of protection.
1st Medical Faculty Charles University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Prague Czech Republic
1st Medical Faculty Charles University Department of Sexology Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027340
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160302113721.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120816s2011 ie f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.08.023 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)20888117
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ie
- 100 1_
- $a Gregorová, Pavlína $u First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Department of Sexology, Prague, Czech Republic; Gona, Sexological Centre, Prague, Czech Republic. pavlina.gregorova@volny.cz $7 _AN048837
- 245 10
- $a Contraceptive behaviour of Czech and Romanian women: comparison of representative national samples / $c P. Gregorová, P. Weiss, V. Unzeitig, D. Cibula
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To investigate the contraceptive behaviour of Czech and Romanian women and their attitudes towards different forms of contraception. STUDY DESIGN: Anonymous questionnaire research among 1011 Czech and 1001 Romanian women between 15 and 50 years of age. The samples were representative of both the Czech and Romanian female populations with respect to age, education and the size of their place of residence. RESULTS: The majority of women use contraception when in a stable sexual relationship. We found a higher percentage of women using contraception among Czech women. Romanian women more often use less reliable methods in a stable relationship, and condoms. Czech women use hormonal contraception much more. Women in the Czech Republic would more often agree to use a condom and, in particular, to use hormonal and intrauterine contraception. More Romanian women than Czech women prefer the method of infertile days. The use of contraception is influenced by the factors of age, education and size of the place of residence. CONCLUSION: The majority of Czech and Romanian women protect themselves against unwanted pregnancy. Czech women are more frequent users of contraceptives in general and, in particular, of hormonal contraception. Romanian women tend to use less reliable methods of contraception but on the other hand, they more often use condoms as a means of protection.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a kondomy $x využití $7 D017280
- 650 _2
- $a antikoncepce $x metody $7 D003267
- 650 _2
- $a antikoncepční chování $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003268
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe $7 D007722
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Rumunsko $7 D012383
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Weiss, Petr, $d 1954- $7 jn20000402680 $u First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Department of Sexology, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Unzeitig, Vít, $d 1952- $7 xx0059657 $u First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Department of Sexology, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, David, $d 1968- $7 jo20000074072 $u First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001632 $t European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology $x 1872-7654 $g Roč. 154, č. 2 (2011), s. 163-166
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20888117 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120816 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160302113438 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949382 $s 784686
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 154 $c 2 $d 163-166 $i 1872-7654 $m European journal of obstetrics, gynecology and reproductive biology $n Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol $x MED00001632
- LZP __
- $b NLK112 $a Pubmed-20120816/11/02