-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bacteriocinogeny in experimental pigs treated with indomethacin and Escherichia coli Nissle
J. Bures, D. Smajs, J. Kvetina, M. Förstl, J. Smarda, D. Kohoutova, M. Kunes, J. Cyrany, I. Tacheci, S. Rejchrt, J. Lesna, V. Vorisek, M. Kopacova,
Jazyk angličtina Země Tchaj-wan
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NS9665
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
Zdroj
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Freely Accessible Science Journals
od 1998
PubMed Central
od 1997
Europe PubMed Central
od 1997
PubMed
21350709
DOI
10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.609
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antiflogistika nesteroidní škodlivé účinky farmakologie MeSH
- bakteriociny metabolismus MeSH
- dechové testy MeSH
- Escherichia coli metabolismus MeSH
- indomethacin škodlivé účinky farmakologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metagenom MeSH
- methan metabolismus MeSH
- probiotika farmakologie MeSH
- střevní sliznice účinky léků mikrobiologie MeSH
- Sus scrofa MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
AIM: To evaluate bacteriocinogeny in short-term high-dose indomethacin administration with or without probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) in experimental pigs. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs entered the study: Group A (controls), Group B (probiotics alone), Group C (indomethacin alone) and Group D (probiotics and indomethacin). EcN (3.5×10(10) bacteria/d for 14 d) and/or indomethacin (15 mg/kg per day for 10 d) were administrated orally. Anal smears before and smears from the small and large intestine were taken from all animals. Bacteriocin production was determined with 6 different indicator strains; all strains were polymerase chain reaction tested for the presence of 29 individual bacteriocin-encoding determinants. RESULTS: The general microbiota profile was rather uniform in all animals but there was a broad diversity in coliform bacteria (parallel genotypes A, B1, B2 and D found). In total, 637 bacterial strains were tested, mostly Escherichia coli (E. coli). There was a higher incidence of non-E. coli strains among samples taken from the jejunum and ileum compared to that of the colon and rectum indicating predominance of E. coli strains in the large intestine. Bacteriocinogeny was found in 24/77 (31%) before and in 155/560 (28%) isolated bacteria at the end of the study. Altogether, 13 individual bacteriocin types (out of 29 tested) were identified among investigated strains. Incidence of four E. coli genotypes was equally distributed in all groups of E. coli strains, with majority of genotype A (ranging from 81% to 88%). The following types of bacteriocins were most commonly revealed: colicins Ia/Ib (44%), microcin V (18%), colicin E1 (16%) and microcin H47 (6%). There was a difference in bacteriocinogeny between control group A (52/149, 35%) and groups with treatment at the end of the study: B: 31/122 (25%, P=0.120); C: 43/155 (28%, P=0.222); D: 29/134 (22%, P=0.020). There was a significantly lower prevalence of colicin Ib, microcins H47 and V (probiotics group, P<0.001), colicin E1 and microcin H47 (indomethacin group, P<0.001) and microcins H47 and V (probiotics and indomethacin group, P=0.025) compared to controls. Escherichia fergusonii (E. fergusonii) was identified in 6 animals (6/11 isolates from the rectum). One strain was non-colicinogenic, while all other strains of E. fergusonii solely produced colicin E1. All animals started and remained methanogenic despite the fact that EcN is a substantial hydrogen producer. There was an increase in breath methane (after the treatment) in 5/6 pigs from the indomethacin group (C). CONCLUSION: EcN did not exert long-term liveability in the porcine intestine. All experimental pigs remained methanogenic. Indomethacin and EcN administered together might produce the worst impact on bacteriocinogeny.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12027787
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140908095949.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2011 ch f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3748/wjg.v17.i5.609 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21350709
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ch
- 100 1_
- $a Bureš, Jan, $d 1954- $7 nlk19990073060 $u 2nd Department of Medicine, Charles University in Praha, Faculty of Medicine at Hradec Kralove, University Teaching Hospital, 500 05 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. bures@lfhk.cuni.cz
- 245 10
- $a Bacteriocinogeny in experimental pigs treated with indomethacin and Escherichia coli Nissle / $c J. Bures, D. Smajs, J. Kvetina, M. Förstl, J. Smarda, D. Kohoutova, M. Kunes, J. Cyrany, I. Tacheci, S. Rejchrt, J. Lesna, V. Vorisek, M. Kopacova,
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: To evaluate bacteriocinogeny in short-term high-dose indomethacin administration with or without probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN) in experimental pigs. METHODS: Twenty-four pigs entered the study: Group A (controls), Group B (probiotics alone), Group C (indomethacin alone) and Group D (probiotics and indomethacin). EcN (3.5×10(10) bacteria/d for 14 d) and/or indomethacin (15 mg/kg per day for 10 d) were administrated orally. Anal smears before and smears from the small and large intestine were taken from all animals. Bacteriocin production was determined with 6 different indicator strains; all strains were polymerase chain reaction tested for the presence of 29 individual bacteriocin-encoding determinants. RESULTS: The general microbiota profile was rather uniform in all animals but there was a broad diversity in coliform bacteria (parallel genotypes A, B1, B2 and D found). In total, 637 bacterial strains were tested, mostly Escherichia coli (E. coli). There was a higher incidence of non-E. coli strains among samples taken from the jejunum and ileum compared to that of the colon and rectum indicating predominance of E. coli strains in the large intestine. Bacteriocinogeny was found in 24/77 (31%) before and in 155/560 (28%) isolated bacteria at the end of the study. Altogether, 13 individual bacteriocin types (out of 29 tested) were identified among investigated strains. Incidence of four E. coli genotypes was equally distributed in all groups of E. coli strains, with majority of genotype A (ranging from 81% to 88%). The following types of bacteriocins were most commonly revealed: colicins Ia/Ib (44%), microcin V (18%), colicin E1 (16%) and microcin H47 (6%). There was a difference in bacteriocinogeny between control group A (52/149, 35%) and groups with treatment at the end of the study: B: 31/122 (25%, P=0.120); C: 43/155 (28%, P=0.222); D: 29/134 (22%, P=0.020). There was a significantly lower prevalence of colicin Ib, microcins H47 and V (probiotics group, P<0.001), colicin E1 and microcin H47 (indomethacin group, P<0.001) and microcins H47 and V (probiotics and indomethacin group, P=0.025) compared to controls. Escherichia fergusonii (E. fergusonii) was identified in 6 animals (6/11 isolates from the rectum). One strain was non-colicinogenic, while all other strains of E. fergusonii solely produced colicin E1. All animals started and remained methanogenic despite the fact that EcN is a substantial hydrogen producer. There was an increase in breath methane (after the treatment) in 5/6 pigs from the indomethacin group (C). CONCLUSION: EcN did not exert long-term liveability in the porcine intestine. All experimental pigs remained methanogenic. Indomethacin and EcN administered together might produce the worst impact on bacteriocinogeny.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antiflogistika nesteroidní $x škodlivé účinky $x farmakologie $7 D000894
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriociny $x metabolismus $7 D001430
- 650 _2
- $a dechové testy $7 D001944
- 650 _2
- $a Escherichia coli $x metabolismus $7 D004926
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a indomethacin $x škodlivé účinky $x farmakologie $7 D007213
- 650 _2
- $a střevní sliznice $x účinky léků $x mikrobiologie $7 D007413
- 650 _2
- $a metagenom $7 D054892
- 650 _2
- $a methan $x metabolismus $7 D008697
- 650 _2
- $a probiotika $x farmakologie $7 D019936
- 650 _2
- $a Sus scrofa $7 D034421
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Šmajs, David, $d 1969- $7 xx0061318
- 700 1_
- $a Květina, Jaroslav
- 700 1_
- $a Förstl, Miroslav, $d 1971-2011 $7 mzk2003192172
- 700 1_
- $a Smarda, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Kohoutová, Darina. $7 mzk2013797579
- 700 1_
- $a Kuneš, Martin $7 xx0081968
- 700 1_
- $a Cyrany, Jiří $7 xx0165194
- 700 1_
- $a Tachecí, Ilja $7 xx0077741
- 700 1_
- $a Rejchrt, Stanislav, $d 1963- $7 mzk2005306779
- 700 1_
- $a Lesna, Jirina
- 700 1_
- $a Vorisek, Viktor
- 700 1_
- $a Kopáčová, Marcela $7 xx0032944
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006918 $t World journal of gastroenterology : WJG $x 1007-9327 $g Roč. 17, č. 5 (2011), s. 609-17
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21350709 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140908100349 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 949829 $s 785133
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 17 $c 5 $d 609-17 $i 1007-9327 $m World journal of gastroenterology $n World J Gastroenterol $x MED00006918
- GRA __
- $a NS9665 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/03