Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Comparison of microbial activity in anaerobic and microaerobic digesters

P. Jenicek, CA. Celis, J. Koubova, D. Pokorna,

. 2011 ; 63 (10) : 2244-9.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12028030

Microaerobic alternative of anaerobic digestion offers many advantages especially when sulfide concentration in the digester is high. For better understanding of the microaerobic technology more detailed characterization of biomass activity is needed. Two equal digesters were operated under the same condition except of microaeration in one of them. During long term operation of anaerobic and microaerobic digesters the sludge quality and the biomass activity was monitored. The activity of sulfide oxidizing bacteria of microaerobic biomass was significantly higher in comparison with anaerobic biomass. The activity of sulfate reducing bacteria was comparable. The activity of methanogenic bacteria activity depended on sulfide concentration more than on microaeration. The extent of foaming problems was lower in the microaerobic than in the anaerobic digester.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028030
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121207111850.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 enk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.2166/wst.2011.579 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21977645
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Jenicek, P $u Department of Water Technology and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Technicka 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic. pavel.jenicek@vscht.cz
245    10
$a Comparison of microbial activity in anaerobic and microaerobic digesters / $c P. Jenicek, CA. Celis, J. Koubova, D. Pokorna,
520    9_
$a Microaerobic alternative of anaerobic digestion offers many advantages especially when sulfide concentration in the digester is high. For better understanding of the microaerobic technology more detailed characterization of biomass activity is needed. Two equal digesters were operated under the same condition except of microaeration in one of them. During long term operation of anaerobic and microaerobic digesters the sludge quality and the biomass activity was monitored. The activity of sulfide oxidizing bacteria of microaerobic biomass was significantly higher in comparison with anaerobic biomass. The activity of sulfate reducing bacteria was comparable. The activity of methanogenic bacteria activity depended on sulfide concentration more than on microaeration. The extent of foaming problems was lower in the microaerobic than in the anaerobic digester.
650    _2
$a aerobní bakterie $x metabolismus $7 D001420
650    _2
$a anaerobní bakterie $x metabolismus $7 D001421
650    _2
$a bioreaktory $x mikrobiologie $7 D019149
650    _2
$a průmyslová mikrobiologie $7 D007218
650    _2
$a methan $x analýza $7 D008697
650    _2
$a oxidace-redukce $7 D010084
650    _2
$a odpadní vody $x chemie $x mikrobiologie $7 D012722
650    _2
$a sírany $x chemie $7 D013431
650    _2
$a sulfidy $x chemie $7 D013440
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Celis, C A
700    1_
$a Koubova, J
700    1_
$a Pokorna, D
773    0_
$w MED00181099 $t Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research $x 0273-1223 $g Roč. 63, č. 10 (2011), s. 2244-9
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21977645 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121207111924 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950072 $s 785376
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 63 $c 10 $d 2244-9 $i 0273-1223 $m Water science and technology. $n Water sci. technol. $x MED00181099
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace