-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of microbial activity in anaerobic and microaerobic digesters
P. Jenicek, CA. Celis, J. Koubova, D. Pokorna,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1982-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1982-01-01 to 1 year ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 1994
PubMed
21977645
DOI
10.2166/wst.2011.579
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Bacteria, Aerobic metabolism MeSH
- Bacteria, Anaerobic metabolism MeSH
- Bioreactors microbiology MeSH
- Methane analysis MeSH
- Sewage chemistry microbiology MeSH
- Oxidation-Reduction MeSH
- Industrial Microbiology MeSH
- Sulfates chemistry MeSH
- Sulfides chemistry MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Microaerobic alternative of anaerobic digestion offers many advantages especially when sulfide concentration in the digester is high. For better understanding of the microaerobic technology more detailed characterization of biomass activity is needed. Two equal digesters were operated under the same condition except of microaeration in one of them. During long term operation of anaerobic and microaerobic digesters the sludge quality and the biomass activity was monitored. The activity of sulfide oxidizing bacteria of microaerobic biomass was significantly higher in comparison with anaerobic biomass. The activity of sulfate reducing bacteria was comparable. The activity of methanogenic bacteria activity depended on sulfide concentration more than on microaeration. The extent of foaming problems was lower in the microaerobic than in the anaerobic digester.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12028030
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207111850.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817s2011 enk f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2166/wst.2011.579 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21977645
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Jenicek, P $u Department of Water Technology and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Technology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Technicka 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic. pavel.jenicek@vscht.cz
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of microbial activity in anaerobic and microaerobic digesters / $c P. Jenicek, CA. Celis, J. Koubova, D. Pokorna,
- 520 9_
- $a Microaerobic alternative of anaerobic digestion offers many advantages especially when sulfide concentration in the digester is high. For better understanding of the microaerobic technology more detailed characterization of biomass activity is needed. Two equal digesters were operated under the same condition except of microaeration in one of them. During long term operation of anaerobic and microaerobic digesters the sludge quality and the biomass activity was monitored. The activity of sulfide oxidizing bacteria of microaerobic biomass was significantly higher in comparison with anaerobic biomass. The activity of sulfate reducing bacteria was comparable. The activity of methanogenic bacteria activity depended on sulfide concentration more than on microaeration. The extent of foaming problems was lower in the microaerobic than in the anaerobic digester.
- 650 _2
- $a aerobní bakterie $x metabolismus $7 D001420
- 650 _2
- $a anaerobní bakterie $x metabolismus $7 D001421
- 650 _2
- $a bioreaktory $x mikrobiologie $7 D019149
- 650 _2
- $a průmyslová mikrobiologie $7 D007218
- 650 _2
- $a methan $x analýza $7 D008697
- 650 _2
- $a oxidace-redukce $7 D010084
- 650 _2
- $a odpadní vody $x chemie $x mikrobiologie $7 D012722
- 650 _2
- $a sírany $x chemie $7 D013431
- 650 _2
- $a sulfidy $x chemie $7 D013440
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Celis, C A
- 700 1_
- $a Koubova, J
- 700 1_
- $a Pokorna, D
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181099 $t Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research $x 0273-1223 $g Roč. 63, č. 10 (2011), s. 2244-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21977645 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207111924 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 950072 $s 785376
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 63 $c 10 $d 2244-9 $i 0273-1223 $m Water science and technology. $n Water sci. technol. $x MED00181099
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/04