• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Revison endonasal dacryocystorhinostomies: analysis of 44 procedures

P. Kominek, S. Cervenka, T. Pniak, K. Zelenik, H. Tomaskova, P. Matousek,

. 2011 ; 49 (3) : 375-80.

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12028099

PURPOSE: To determine the success rate of revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomies (DCR) and to analyse 44 revision DCRs. METHODS: The operative and postoperative data were collected in 44 revision DCRs. The corrections of associated structural anatomic alterations were performed during the surgery (resection of the scarr, the bone window creating, resection of the head of the middle turbinate, septoplasty, ethmoidectomy etc.) and the intubation was performed in all cases. RESULTS: The follow-up interval ranged from 12 to 36 months. The 44 ReEDCRs were performed in adults and there were only 5 children under the age of 15. The surgery was performed under local or general anaesthesia. The most frequent secondary procedures were scar resections, creating a wider bone window, and partial middle turbinate resection. Four patients were excluded for their follow-up periods had not been completed. An average time of the tubes removal was 5.6 months. The total success rate was 84.0%; the success rate was 85.7% in the group with closed rhinostomy and 1/2 in the group of canalicular and rhinostomy obstructions. CONCLUSIONS: The endonasal revision DCR is a safe and very effective surgical procedure following the failed DCRs. The correction of associated structural anatomic alterations that may be involved in the failure of previous surgeries can be easily performed.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028099
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170623110505.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 ne f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.4193/rhino10.293 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21858272
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Komínek, Pavel, $d 1958- $7 mzk2003194888 $u Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic. pavel.kominek@fno.cz
245    10
$a Revison endonasal dacryocystorhinostomies: analysis of 44 procedures / $c P. Kominek, S. Cervenka, T. Pniak, K. Zelenik, H. Tomaskova, P. Matousek,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To determine the success rate of revision endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomies (DCR) and to analyse 44 revision DCRs. METHODS: The operative and postoperative data were collected in 44 revision DCRs. The corrections of associated structural anatomic alterations were performed during the surgery (resection of the scarr, the bone window creating, resection of the head of the middle turbinate, septoplasty, ethmoidectomy etc.) and the intubation was performed in all cases. RESULTS: The follow-up interval ranged from 12 to 36 months. The 44 ReEDCRs were performed in adults and there were only 5 children under the age of 15. The surgery was performed under local or general anaesthesia. The most frequent secondary procedures were scar resections, creating a wider bone window, and partial middle turbinate resection. Four patients were excluded for their follow-up periods had not been completed. An average time of the tubes removal was 5.6 months. The total success rate was 84.0%; the success rate was 85.7% in the group with closed rhinostomy and 1/2 in the group of canalicular and rhinostomy obstructions. CONCLUSIONS: The endonasal revision DCR is a safe and very effective surgical procedure following the failed DCRs. The correction of associated structural anatomic alterations that may be involved in the failure of previous surgeries can be easily performed.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a dakryocystorinostomie $x metody $7 D003608
650    _2
$a endoskopie $7 D004724
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a reoperace $7 D012086
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Červenka, S
700    1_
$a Pniak, Tomáš $7 xx0082616
700    1_
$a Zelenik, K
700    1_
$a Tomaskova, H
700    1_
$a Matoušek, P
773    0_
$w MED00004229 $t Rhinology $x 0300-0729 $g Roč. 49, č. 3 (2011), s. 375-80
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21858272 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170623110926 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950141 $s 785445
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 49 $c 3 $d 375-80 $i 0300-0729 $m Rhinology $n Rhinology $x MED00004229
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...