-
Something wrong with this record ?
Calculating economic weights for sheep sire breeds used in different breeding systems
M. Wolfová, J. Wolf, M. Milerski,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-10-01 to 2021-03-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-10-01 to 2021-03-31
PubMed
21278120
DOI
10.2527/jas.2010-3237
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Models, Biological MeSH
- Breeding economics MeSH
- Genetic Variation MeSH
- Weight Gain MeSH
- Sheep genetics MeSH
- Reproduction genetics physiology MeSH
- Gene Flow MeSH
- Wool MeSH
- Agriculture economics MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
The objective of this paper was to adapt gene-flow methodology for the calculation of economic weights (EW) for direct and maternal traits and trait components in sheep and to apply this methodology to the Suffolk breed in the Czech Republic. Computer programs were developed in which annual-lambing sheep production systems with purebreeding or partial terminal crossing were simulated. Using these programs, the EW for 12 production and functional traits were estimated for i) Suffolk sires whose sons were used both in purebreeding and in terminal crossing with the 4 dual-purpose breeds, Romanov, Sumavska, Romney, and Merinolandschaf; and ii) Suffolk sires used only for terminal crossing. For case (i), the EW were at first calculated separately for the purebreeding system and for the crossing systems with the 4 dual-purpose breeds in dam position. Compound EW for the general breeding goal for Suffolk were then estimated as weighted averages from the EW in the 5 subsystems. Standardized EW were calculated by multiplying the marginal EW with the genetic SD of the trait, and relative EW were defined as absolute values of the standardized EW expressed as percentage of the sum of the absolute values of the standardized EW over all traits. The 5 most important trait components for Suffolk sires whose sons were used both in purebreeding and in terminal crossing were (relative EW given in parentheses): the direct components of survival rate until weaning (21.0%), daily BW gain until weaning (14.1%), survival rate at birth (14.0%), the maternal component of survival rate until weaning (10.7%), and litter size at lambing (7.6%). There were only small differences between the relative EW calculated for the whole system with pure- and crossbreeding and the relative EW for the purebred system within the Suffolk breed. Therefore, selection of Suffolk rams using a selection index based on the compound EW is expected to be of high efficiency in all of the simulated breeding systems. Only direct traits were relevant for Suffolk sires used only for terminal crossing; the most important (range of relative EW calculated for the 4 crossing systems given in parentheses) were survival rate until weaning (35.2 to 36.5%), daily BW gain until weaning (24.2 to 26.3%), and survival rate at birth (23.7 to 24.8%).
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12028444
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207113747.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 120817e20110128xxu f 000 0#eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.2527/jas.2010-3237 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)21278120
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Wolfová, M $u Institute of Animal Science, PO Box 1, CZ 10401 Prague Uhříněves, Czech Republic. wolfova.marie@vuzv.cz
- 245 10
- $a Calculating economic weights for sheep sire breeds used in different breeding systems / $c M. Wolfová, J. Wolf, M. Milerski,
- 520 9_
- $a The objective of this paper was to adapt gene-flow methodology for the calculation of economic weights (EW) for direct and maternal traits and trait components in sheep and to apply this methodology to the Suffolk breed in the Czech Republic. Computer programs were developed in which annual-lambing sheep production systems with purebreeding or partial terminal crossing were simulated. Using these programs, the EW for 12 production and functional traits were estimated for i) Suffolk sires whose sons were used both in purebreeding and in terminal crossing with the 4 dual-purpose breeds, Romanov, Sumavska, Romney, and Merinolandschaf; and ii) Suffolk sires used only for terminal crossing. For case (i), the EW were at first calculated separately for the purebreeding system and for the crossing systems with the 4 dual-purpose breeds in dam position. Compound EW for the general breeding goal for Suffolk were then estimated as weighted averages from the EW in the 5 subsystems. Standardized EW were calculated by multiplying the marginal EW with the genetic SD of the trait, and relative EW were defined as absolute values of the standardized EW expressed as percentage of the sum of the absolute values of the standardized EW over all traits. The 5 most important trait components for Suffolk sires whose sons were used both in purebreeding and in terminal crossing were (relative EW given in parentheses): the direct components of survival rate until weaning (21.0%), daily BW gain until weaning (14.1%), survival rate at birth (14.0%), the maternal component of survival rate until weaning (10.7%), and litter size at lambing (7.6%). There were only small differences between the relative EW calculated for the whole system with pure- and crossbreeding and the relative EW for the purebred system within the Suffolk breed. Therefore, selection of Suffolk rams using a selection index based on the compound EW is expected to be of high efficiency in all of the simulated breeding systems. Only direct traits were relevant for Suffolk sires used only for terminal crossing; the most important (range of relative EW calculated for the 4 crossing systems given in parentheses) were survival rate until weaning (35.2 to 36.5%), daily BW gain until weaning (24.2 to 26.3%), and survival rate at birth (23.7 to 24.8%).
- 650 _2
- $a zemědělství $x ekonomika $7 D000383
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a chov $x ekonomika $7 D001947
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a tok genů $7 D051456
- 650 _2
- $a genetická variace $7 D014644
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a rozmnožování $x genetika $x fyziologie $7 D012098
- 650 _2
- $a ovce $x genetika $7 D012756
- 650 _2
- $a hmotnostní přírůstek $7 D015430
- 650 _2
- $a vlna $7 D014935
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Wolf, J
- 700 1_
- $a Milerski, M
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006051 $t Journal of animal science $x 1525-3163 $g Roč. 89, č. 6 (20110128), s. 1698-711
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21278120 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
- 990 __
- $a 20120817 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207113821 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 950486 $s 785790
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2011 $b 89 $c 6 $d 1698-711 $e 20110128 $i 1525-3163 $m Journal of animal science $n J Anim Sci $x MED00006051
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20120817/11/04