Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: midterm efficacy and predictors of postablation arrhythmia recurrences

P. Hlivák, H. Mlčochová, P. Peichl, R. Cihák, D. Wichterle, J. Kautzner,

. 2011 ; 22 (5) : 534-40.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

INTRODUCTION: Remote navigation systems represent a novel strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The goal of this study is to describe a single-center experience with the electromechanical robotic system (Sensei, Hansen Medical) in treatment of patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Out of 200 patients who underwent robotically guided ablation for AF between 2007 and 2009 at our institute, 100 patients (29 women, age 56.5 ± 10 years) had paroxysmal AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Electroanatomic mapping using NavX system (St. Jude Medical) provided anatomical shell for subsequent circumferential ablation with robotic catheter (Artisan) loaded with a 3.5-mm, open-irrigation, cooled-tip ablation catheter. RESULTS: A mean of 69 radiofrequency current applications (duration 2082 ± 812 seconds) were delivered to achieve circumferential electrical isolation of pulmonary venous antra. Total procedural time reached 222 ± 54 minutes. The mean fluoroscopic time was 11.9 ± 7.8 minutes. There were no major procedure-related complications. After a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3-28 months), 63% of the patients were free from any atrial arrhythmias ≥ 30 seconds after the single procedure. Success rate increased to 86% after 1.2 procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed that only predictor of recurrent AF/AT was shorter overall procedural time (207 ± 36 vs 236 ± 64 minutes in patients with and without recurrences, respectively, P = 0.0068). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates feasibility and safety of robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. Midterm follow-up documents success rate comparable to other technologies and potential for improvement in more extensive ablation along the ridges with thicker myocardium.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028471
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181023140454.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 xxu f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01942.x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21091964
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Hlivák, Peter $u Department of Cardiology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: midterm efficacy and predictors of postablation arrhythmia recurrences / $c P. Hlivák, H. Mlčochová, P. Peichl, R. Cihák, D. Wichterle, J. Kautzner,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Remote navigation systems represent a novel strategy for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The goal of this study is to describe a single-center experience with the electromechanical robotic system (Sensei, Hansen Medical) in treatment of patients with paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Out of 200 patients who underwent robotically guided ablation for AF between 2007 and 2009 at our institute, 100 patients (29 women, age 56.5 ± 10 years) had paroxysmal AF refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs. Electroanatomic mapping using NavX system (St. Jude Medical) provided anatomical shell for subsequent circumferential ablation with robotic catheter (Artisan) loaded with a 3.5-mm, open-irrigation, cooled-tip ablation catheter. RESULTS: A mean of 69 radiofrequency current applications (duration 2082 ± 812 seconds) were delivered to achieve circumferential electrical isolation of pulmonary venous antra. Total procedural time reached 222 ± 54 minutes. The mean fluoroscopic time was 11.9 ± 7.8 minutes. There were no major procedure-related complications. After a median follow-up of 15 months (range 3-28 months), 63% of the patients were free from any atrial arrhythmias ≥ 30 seconds after the single procedure. Success rate increased to 86% after 1.2 procedures. Multivariate analysis revealed that only predictor of recurrent AF/AT was shorter overall procedural time (207 ± 36 vs 236 ± 64 minutes in patients with and without recurrences, respectively, P = 0.0068). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates feasibility and safety of robotic navigation in catheter ablation for paroxysmal AF. Midterm follow-up documents success rate comparable to other technologies and potential for improvement in more extensive ablation along the ridges with thicker myocardium.
650    _2
$a fibrilace síní $x epidemiologie $x chirurgie $7 D001281
650    _2
$a katetrizační ablace $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D017115
650    _2
$a komorbidita $7 D015897
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x epidemiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011183
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
650    _2
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a robotika $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D012371
650    _2
$a chirurgie s pomocí počítače $7 D025321
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mlčochová, Hanka
700    1_
$a Peichl, Petr, $d 1976- $7 xx0092197
700    1_
$a Cihák, Robert
700    1_
$a Wichterle, Dan
700    1_
$a Kautzner, Josef
773    0_
$w MED00002569 $t Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $x 1540-8167 $g Roč. 22, č. 5 (2011), s. 534-40
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21091964 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m $z 0
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181023141001 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950513 $s 785817
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 22 $c 5 $d 534-40 $i 1540-8167 $m Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology $n J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol $x MED00002569
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...