• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds

M. Krist,

. 2011 ; 86 (3) : 692-716.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, metaanalýza, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12028476

Parents affect offspring fitness by propagule size and quality, selection of oviposition site, quality of incubation, feeding of dependent young, and their defence against predators and parasites. Despite many case studies on each of these topics, this knowledge has not been rigorously integrated into individual parental care traits for any taxon. Consequently, we lack a comprehensive, quantitative assessment of how parental care modifies offspring phenotypes. This meta-analysis of 283 studies with 1805 correlations between egg size and offspring quality in birds is intended to fill this gap. The large sample size enabled testing of how the magnitude of the relationship between egg size and offspring quality depends on a number of variables. Egg size was positively related to nearly all studied offspring traits across all stages of the offspring life cycle. Not surprisingly, the relationship was strongest at hatching but persisted until the post-fledging stage. Morphological traits were the most closely related to egg size but significant relationships were also found with hatching success, chick survival, and growth rate. Non-significant effect sizes were found for egg fertility, chick immunity, behaviour, and life-history or sexual traits. Effect size did not depend on whether chicks were raised by their natural parents or were cross-fostered to other territories. Effect size did not depend on species-specific traits such as developmental mode, clutch size, and relative size of the egg, but was larger if tested in captive compared to wild populations and between rather than within broods. In sum, published studies support the view that egg size affects juvenile survival. There are very few studies that tested the relationship between egg size and the fecundity component of offspring fitness, and no studies on offspring survival as adults or on global fitness. More data are also needed for the relationships between egg size and offspring behavioural and physiological traits. It remains to be established whether the relationship between egg size and offspring performance depends on the quality of the offspring environment. Positive effect sizes found in this study are likely to be driven by a causal effect of egg size on offspring quality. However, more studies that control for potential confounding effects of parental post-hatching care, genes, and egg composition are needed to establish firmly this causal link.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12028476
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20121206114916.0
007      
ta
008      
120817s2011 enk f 000 0#eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00166.x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)21070586
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Krist, Miloš $u Museum of Natural History, nám. Republiky 5, 771 73 Olomouc, Czech Republic. milos.krist@upol.cz
245    10
$a Egg size and offspring quality: a meta-analysis in birds / $c M. Krist,
520    9_
$a Parents affect offspring fitness by propagule size and quality, selection of oviposition site, quality of incubation, feeding of dependent young, and their defence against predators and parasites. Despite many case studies on each of these topics, this knowledge has not been rigorously integrated into individual parental care traits for any taxon. Consequently, we lack a comprehensive, quantitative assessment of how parental care modifies offspring phenotypes. This meta-analysis of 283 studies with 1805 correlations between egg size and offspring quality in birds is intended to fill this gap. The large sample size enabled testing of how the magnitude of the relationship between egg size and offspring quality depends on a number of variables. Egg size was positively related to nearly all studied offspring traits across all stages of the offspring life cycle. Not surprisingly, the relationship was strongest at hatching but persisted until the post-fledging stage. Morphological traits were the most closely related to egg size but significant relationships were also found with hatching success, chick survival, and growth rate. Non-significant effect sizes were found for egg fertility, chick immunity, behaviour, and life-history or sexual traits. Effect size did not depend on whether chicks were raised by their natural parents or were cross-fostered to other territories. Effect size did not depend on species-specific traits such as developmental mode, clutch size, and relative size of the egg, but was larger if tested in captive compared to wild populations and between rather than within broods. In sum, published studies support the view that egg size affects juvenile survival. There are very few studies that tested the relationship between egg size and the fecundity component of offspring fitness, and no studies on offspring survival as adults or on global fitness. More data are also needed for the relationships between egg size and offspring behavioural and physiological traits. It remains to be established whether the relationship between egg size and offspring performance depends on the quality of the offspring environment. Positive effect sizes found in this study are likely to be driven by a causal effect of egg size on offspring quality. However, more studies that control for potential confounding effects of parental post-hatching care, genes, and egg composition are needed to establish firmly this causal link.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a ptáci $x fyziologie $7 D001717
650    _2
$a genetická zdatnost $7 D056084
650    _2
$a dlouhověkost $x fyziologie $7 D008136
650    _2
$a ovum $x cytologie $x fyziologie $7 D010063
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a metaanalýza $7 D017418
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
773    0_
$w MED00012098 $t Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society $x 1469-185X $g Roč. 86, č. 3 (2011), s. 692-716
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21070586 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y m
990    __
$a 20120817 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20121206114950 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 950518 $s 785822
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2011 $b 86 $c 3 $d 692-716 $i 1469-185X $m Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society $n Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc $x MED00012098
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20120817/11/04

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...