-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effect of medetomidine-butorphanol and dexmedetomidine-butorphanol combinations on intraocular pressure in healthy dogs
P. Rauser, J. Pfeifr, P. Proks, L. Stehlík,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie
- MeSH
- butorfanol aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- časové faktory MeSH
- dexmedetomidin aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- kombinovaná farmakoterapie MeSH
- medetomidin aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- neopioidní analgetika aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- nitrooční tlak účinky léků MeSH
- opioidní analgetika aplikace a dávkování farmakologie MeSH
- psi fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- psi fyziologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of intravenous (IV) medetomidine-butorphanol and IV dexmedetomidine-butorphanol on intraocular pressure (IOP). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study. ANIMALS: Forty healthy dogs. Mean ± SD body mass 37.6 ± 6.6 kg and age 1.9 ± 1.3 years. METHODS: Dogs were allocated randomly to receive an IV combination of dexmedetomidine, 0.3 mg m(-2), combined with butorphanol, 6 mg m(-2), (group DEX) or medetomidine 0.3 mg m(-2), combined with butorphanol 6 mg m(-2), (group MED). IOP and pulse (PR) and respiratory (f(R) ) rates were measured prior to (baseline) and at 10 (T10), 20 (T20), 30 (T30) and 40 (T40) minutes after drug administration. Oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO(2)) was monitored following sedation. Data were analyzed by anova followed by Dunnett's tests for multiple comparisons. Changes were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: Following drug administration, PR and f(R) were decreased significantly at all time points but did not differ significantly between groups. Baseline IOP in mmHg was 14 ± 2 for DEX and 13 ± 2 for MED. With both treatments, at T10, IOP increased significantly (p < 0.001), reaching 20 ± 3 and 17 ± 2 for DEX and MED respectively. This value for DEX was significantly higher than for MED. There were no significant differences in IOP values between groups at any other time points. At T30 and T40, IOP in both groups was below baseline (DEX, 12 ± 2 and 11 ± 2: MED 12 ± 2 and 11 ± 2) and this was statistically significant, for DEX. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the documented doses, both sedative combinations induced a transient increase and subsequent decrease of IOP relative to baseline, which must be taken into consideration when planning sedation of animals in which marked changes in IOP would be undesirable.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12034662
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20121207112144.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121023s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00703.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22420953
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Rauser, Petr $u Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, Small Animal Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic. rauserp@vfu.cz
- 245 10
- $a Effect of medetomidine-butorphanol and dexmedetomidine-butorphanol combinations on intraocular pressure in healthy dogs / $c P. Rauser, J. Pfeifr, P. Proks, L. Stehlík,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of intravenous (IV) medetomidine-butorphanol and IV dexmedetomidine-butorphanol on intraocular pressure (IOP). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, blinded clinical study. ANIMALS: Forty healthy dogs. Mean ± SD body mass 37.6 ± 6.6 kg and age 1.9 ± 1.3 years. METHODS: Dogs were allocated randomly to receive an IV combination of dexmedetomidine, 0.3 mg m(-2), combined with butorphanol, 6 mg m(-2), (group DEX) or medetomidine 0.3 mg m(-2), combined with butorphanol 6 mg m(-2), (group MED). IOP and pulse (PR) and respiratory (f(R) ) rates were measured prior to (baseline) and at 10 (T10), 20 (T20), 30 (T30) and 40 (T40) minutes after drug administration. Oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO(2)) was monitored following sedation. Data were analyzed by anova followed by Dunnett's tests for multiple comparisons. Changes were considered significant when p < 0.05. RESULTS: Following drug administration, PR and f(R) were decreased significantly at all time points but did not differ significantly between groups. Baseline IOP in mmHg was 14 ± 2 for DEX and 13 ± 2 for MED. With both treatments, at T10, IOP increased significantly (p < 0.001), reaching 20 ± 3 and 17 ± 2 for DEX and MED respectively. This value for DEX was significantly higher than for MED. There were no significant differences in IOP values between groups at any other time points. At T30 and T40, IOP in both groups was below baseline (DEX, 12 ± 2 and 11 ± 2: MED 12 ± 2 and 11 ± 2) and this was statistically significant, for DEX. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At the documented doses, both sedative combinations induced a transient increase and subsequent decrease of IOP relative to baseline, which must be taken into consideration when planning sedation of animals in which marked changes in IOP would be undesirable.
- 650 _2
- $a neopioidní analgetika $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D018712
- 650 _2
- $a opioidní analgetika $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D000701
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a butorfanol $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D002077
- 650 _2
- $a dexmedetomidin $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D020927
- 650 _2
- $a psi $x fyziologie $7 D004285
- 650 _2
- $a kombinovaná farmakoterapie $7 D004359
- 650 _2
- $a nitrooční tlak $x účinky léků $7 D007429
- 650 _2
- $a medetomidin $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakologie $7 D020926
- 650 _2
- $a časové faktory $7 D013997
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Pfeifr, Jakub
- 700 1_
- $a Proks, Pavel
- 700 1_
- $a Stehlík, Ladislav
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007385 $t Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia $x 1467-2995 $g Roč. 39, č. 3 (2012), s. 301-5
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22420953 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a
- 990 __
- $a 20121023 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20121207112218 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 956672 $s 792159
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 39 $c 3 $d 301-5 $i 1467-2995 $m Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia $n Vet Anaesth Analg $x MED00007385
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20121023