-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model
T. Novotný, J. Jeřábek, K. Veselý, R. Staffa, M. Dvořák, J. Cagaš,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Tissue Adhesions etiology pathology MeSH
- Biocompatible Materials adverse effects MeSH
- Abdominal Wall surgery MeSH
- Surgical Mesh adverse effects MeSH
- Granuloma pathology MeSH
- Rabbits MeSH
- Random Allocation MeSH
- Peritoneum surgery MeSH
- Shear Strength MeSH
- Polytetrafluoroethylene adverse effects MeSH
- Equipment Failure MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Rabbits MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: The intraperitoneal application of surgical mesh remains a controversial issue because of possible complications, especially adhesion and fistula formation. This study aimed to assess the potential of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh for intraabdominal implantation. METHODS: Twenty-eight 5 × 5 cm samples of knitted macroporous PTFE mesh and light-weight polypropylene mesh (LW-PP) were implanted intraperitoneally in 14 New Zealand white rabbits in a randomized manner and fixed using eight polypropylene stitches. After 90 days, the adhesion formation, adhesion score, shrinkage, strength of fixation to the abdominal wall, and histologic biocompatibility were assessed. RESULTS: No intraoperative or anesthesia-related complications or mesh infection were recorded. The average area covered by adhesions was 4.7 ± 7.2% for the PTFE and 36.4 ± 36.1% for the LW-PP. The median adhesion score was 0 for the PTFE and 8 for the LW-PP. Shrinkage was 36.9 ± 12.9% for the PTFE mesh and 12.6 ± 8.72% for the LW-PP. The mesh-to-abdominal wall fixation strength was almost the same for both materials (PTFE 3.6 ± 1.9 vs. LW-PP 3.6 ± 2.9). The inflammatory cell count was almost the same for the two groups, with no statistically significant difference. The width of the inner granuloma was equal (PTFE 10.5 ± 0.9 vs. LW-PP 11.1 ± 0.9). The outer granuloma was reduced significantly in the PTFE group (PTFE 23.0 ± 2.1 vs. LW-PP 33.6 ± 7.9). One of the animals in the PTFE group died on postoperative day 12 because of ileus. The reason was an adhesion of the small intestine to the polypropylene fixation stitch, which caused small intestine strangulation. CONCLUSIONS: The knitted PTFE mesh induces fewer intraperitoneal adhesions of lower density than the light-weight polypropylene mesh. The strength of the knitted PTFE mesh fixation to the abdominal wall is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene mesh, but the shrinkage is greater. The biocompatibility of the knitted PTFE mesh is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene implant.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12034808
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20240618122841.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121023s2012 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00464-011-2120-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22219009
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Novotný, Tomáš $u 2nd Department of Surgery, St. Anne's University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Pekařská 53, 656 91 Brno, Czech Republic. tomas.novotny@fnusa.cz
- 245 10
- $a Evaluation of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene mesh placed intraperitoneally in a New Zealand white rabbit model / $c T. Novotný, J. Jeřábek, K. Veselý, R. Staffa, M. Dvořák, J. Cagaš,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: The intraperitoneal application of surgical mesh remains a controversial issue because of possible complications, especially adhesion and fistula formation. This study aimed to assess the potential of a knitted polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) mesh for intraabdominal implantation. METHODS: Twenty-eight 5 × 5 cm samples of knitted macroporous PTFE mesh and light-weight polypropylene mesh (LW-PP) were implanted intraperitoneally in 14 New Zealand white rabbits in a randomized manner and fixed using eight polypropylene stitches. After 90 days, the adhesion formation, adhesion score, shrinkage, strength of fixation to the abdominal wall, and histologic biocompatibility were assessed. RESULTS: No intraoperative or anesthesia-related complications or mesh infection were recorded. The average area covered by adhesions was 4.7 ± 7.2% for the PTFE and 36.4 ± 36.1% for the LW-PP. The median adhesion score was 0 for the PTFE and 8 for the LW-PP. Shrinkage was 36.9 ± 12.9% for the PTFE mesh and 12.6 ± 8.72% for the LW-PP. The mesh-to-abdominal wall fixation strength was almost the same for both materials (PTFE 3.6 ± 1.9 vs. LW-PP 3.6 ± 2.9). The inflammatory cell count was almost the same for the two groups, with no statistically significant difference. The width of the inner granuloma was equal (PTFE 10.5 ± 0.9 vs. LW-PP 11.1 ± 0.9). The outer granuloma was reduced significantly in the PTFE group (PTFE 23.0 ± 2.1 vs. LW-PP 33.6 ± 7.9). One of the animals in the PTFE group died on postoperative day 12 because of ileus. The reason was an adhesion of the small intestine to the polypropylene fixation stitch, which caused small intestine strangulation. CONCLUSIONS: The knitted PTFE mesh induces fewer intraperitoneal adhesions of lower density than the light-weight polypropylene mesh. The strength of the knitted PTFE mesh fixation to the abdominal wall is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene mesh, but the shrinkage is greater. The biocompatibility of the knitted PTFE mesh is comparable with that of the light-weight polypropylene implant.
- 650 _2
- $a břišní stěna $x chirurgie $7 D034861
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a biokompatibilní materiály $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001672
- 650 _2
- $a selhání zařízení $7 D004868
- 650 _2
- $a granulom $x patologie $7 D006099
- 650 _2
- $a peritoneum $x chirurgie $7 D010537
- 650 _2
- $a polytetrafluoroethylen $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011138
- 650 _2
- $a králíci $7 D011817
- 650 _2
- $a náhodné rozdělení $7 D011897
- 650 _2
- $a pevnost ve smyku $7 D033081
- 650 _2
- $a chirurgické síťky $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013526
- 650 _2
- $a adheze tkání $x etiologie $x patologie $7 D000267
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Jeřábek, Jiří
- 700 1_
- $a Veselý, Karel
- 700 1_
- $a Staffa, Robert
- 700 1_
- $a Dvořák, Martin, $d 1969- $7 xx0087410
- 700 1_
- $a Cagaš, Jan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004464 $t Surgical endoscopy $x 1432-2218 $g Roč. 26, č. 7 (2012), s. 1884-91
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22219009 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20121023 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20240618122842 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 956818 $s 792305
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 26 $c 7 $d 1884-91 $i 1432-2218 $m Surgical endoscopy $n Surg Endosc $x MED00004464
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20121023