-
Something wrong with this record ?
Should hysteroscopy be provided for patients who have undergone instrumental intrauterine intervention after delivery?
L. Hrazdirova, K. Svabik, Z. Zizka, A. Germanova, D. Kuzel
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
NS10576
MZ0
CEP Register
- MeSH
- Tissue Adhesions diagnosis MeSH
- Dilatation and Curettage MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Hysteroscopy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Uterine Diseases diagnosis epidemiology etiology MeSH
- Postoperative Complications diagnosis epidemiology MeSH
- Prevalence MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Placenta, Retained surgery MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Pregnancy MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
We investigated the frequency of pathology, especially intrauterine adhesions, after instrumental evacuation within 24 h of delivery in a prospective observational intervention study on 100 women where a 'see and treat' hysteroscopy was performed after three to four months. There were two possible etiology groups: intrauterine adhesions [classified according by European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) grades I-IV] and residual tissue (classified as minimal and considerable). Adhesions were found in 18% of patients, as follows: ESGE I-II in 13% and ESGE III-IV in 5%. Residual tissue was present in 33%, as follows: minimal in 23% and considerable in 10%. There were 6% who had both mild adhesions and minimal residual tissue, while 43% of the women had normal intrauterine findings. Of the women, 32% were symptomatic (spotting, bleeding). Only residual tissue correlated with symptoms (r=0.376; p<0.001). There is a high prevalence of acquired intrauterine pathology (57%) in women who require early instrumental evacuation.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc12034831
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140901151118.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 121023s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01338.x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22168749
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Hrazdirova, Lucie $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.hra@seznam.cz
- 245 10
- $a Should hysteroscopy be provided for patients who have undergone instrumental intrauterine intervention after delivery? / $c L. Hrazdirova, K. Svabik, Z. Zizka, A. Germanova, D. Kuzel
- 520 9_
- $a We investigated the frequency of pathology, especially intrauterine adhesions, after instrumental evacuation within 24 h of delivery in a prospective observational intervention study on 100 women where a 'see and treat' hysteroscopy was performed after three to four months. There were two possible etiology groups: intrauterine adhesions [classified according by European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) grades I-IV] and residual tissue (classified as minimal and considerable). Adhesions were found in 18% of patients, as follows: ESGE I-II in 13% and ESGE III-IV in 5%. Residual tissue was present in 33%, as follows: minimal in 23% and considerable in 10%. There were 6% who had both mild adhesions and minimal residual tissue, while 43% of the women had normal intrauterine findings. Of the women, 32% were symptomatic (spotting, bleeding). Only residual tissue correlated with symptoms (r=0.376; p<0.001). There is a high prevalence of acquired intrauterine pathology (57%) in women who require early instrumental evacuation.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a dilatace a kyretáž $7 D004107
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a hysteroskopie $7 D015907
- 650 _2
- $a zadržená placenta $x chirurgie $7 D018457
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační komplikace $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
- 650 _2
- $a těhotenství $7 D011247
- 650 _2
- $a prevalence $7 D015995
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a adheze tkání $x diagnóza $7 D000267
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci dělohy $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D014591
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Svabik, Kamil $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Zizka, Zdenek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Germanova, Anna $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kuzel, David $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009026 $t Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica $x 1600-0412 $g Roč. 91, č. 4 (2012), s. 514-517
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22168749 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20121023 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140901151508 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 956841 $s 792328
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 91 $c 4 $d 514-517 $i 1600-0412 $m Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica $n Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand $x MED00009026
- GRA __
- $a NS10576 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20121023