Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Should hysteroscopy be provided for patients who have undergone instrumental intrauterine intervention after delivery?

L. Hrazdirova, K. Svabik, Z. Zizka, A. Germanova, D. Kuzel

. 2012 ; 91 (4) : 514-517.

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc12034831

Grantová podpora
NS10576 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

We investigated the frequency of pathology, especially intrauterine adhesions, after instrumental evacuation within 24 h of delivery in a prospective observational intervention study on 100 women where a 'see and treat' hysteroscopy was performed after three to four months. There were two possible etiology groups: intrauterine adhesions [classified according by European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) grades I-IV] and residual tissue (classified as minimal and considerable). Adhesions were found in 18% of patients, as follows: ESGE I-II in 13% and ESGE III-IV in 5%. Residual tissue was present in 33%, as follows: minimal in 23% and considerable in 10%. There were 6% who had both mild adhesions and minimal residual tissue, while 43% of the women had normal intrauterine findings. Of the women, 32% were symptomatic (spotting, bleeding). Only residual tissue correlated with symptoms (r=0.376; p<0.001). There is a high prevalence of acquired intrauterine pathology (57%) in women who require early instrumental evacuation.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc12034831
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140901151118.0
007      
ta
008      
121023s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01338.x $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22168749
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hrazdirova, Lucie $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. lucie.hra@seznam.cz
245    10
$a Should hysteroscopy be provided for patients who have undergone instrumental intrauterine intervention after delivery? / $c L. Hrazdirova, K. Svabik, Z. Zizka, A. Germanova, D. Kuzel
520    9_
$a We investigated the frequency of pathology, especially intrauterine adhesions, after instrumental evacuation within 24 h of delivery in a prospective observational intervention study on 100 women where a 'see and treat' hysteroscopy was performed after three to four months. There were two possible etiology groups: intrauterine adhesions [classified according by European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) grades I-IV] and residual tissue (classified as minimal and considerable). Adhesions were found in 18% of patients, as follows: ESGE I-II in 13% and ESGE III-IV in 5%. Residual tissue was present in 33%, as follows: minimal in 23% and considerable in 10%. There were 6% who had both mild adhesions and minimal residual tissue, while 43% of the women had normal intrauterine findings. Of the women, 32% were symptomatic (spotting, bleeding). Only residual tissue correlated with symptoms (r=0.376; p<0.001). There is a high prevalence of acquired intrauterine pathology (57%) in women who require early instrumental evacuation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a dilatace a kyretáž $7 D004107
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a hysteroskopie $7 D015907
650    _2
$a zadržená placenta $x chirurgie $7 D018457
650    _2
$a pooperační komplikace $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $7 D011183
650    _2
$a těhotenství $7 D011247
650    _2
$a prevalence $7 D015995
650    _2
$a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
650    _2
$a adheze tkání $x diagnóza $7 D000267
650    _2
$a nemoci dělohy $x diagnóza $x epidemiologie $x etiologie $7 D014591
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Svabik, Kamil $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Zizka, Zdenek $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Germanova, Anna $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kuzel, David $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, General University Hospital and First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
773    0_
$w MED00009026 $t Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica $x 1600-0412 $g Roč. 91, č. 4 (2012), s. 514-517
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22168749 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20121023 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140901151508 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 956841 $s 792328
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 91 $c 4 $d 514-517 $i 1600-0412 $m Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica $n Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand $x MED00009026
GRA    __
$a NS10576 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20121023

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...