• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A Comparison of collateral sprouting of sensory and motor axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy with and without the perineurial window

P. Haninec, R. Kaiser, P. Dubový,

. 2012 ; 130 (3) : 609-14.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13000599

BACKGROUND: Many experimental studies have confirmed collateral sprouting of axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy and its possible clinical application. There is still controversy about how the surgical method should be carried out. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively evaluate collateral sprouting of motor and sensory axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy with and without the perineurial window. METHODS: End-to-side neurorrhaphy of the distal stump of transected musculocutaneous nerve with intact ulnar nerve with or without a perineurial window was performed in a rat model. Collateral sprouts were quantitatively evaluated by counting of motor and sensory neurons following their retrograde labeling by Fluoro-Ruby and Fluoro-Emerald applied to the ulnar and musculocutaneous nerves, respectively. RESULTS: Our results show that significantly more motor and sensory axons sent their collateral branches into the recipient nerve in the group with a perineurial window. Some axons were injured during preparation of the perineurial window; the injured axons reinnervated directly into the recipient nerve to contribute to results of functional reinnervation. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that it is necessary to create a perineurial window when using end-to-side neurorrhaphy in clinical practice, especially in brachial plexus reconstruction.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000599
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130111094334.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1097/prs.0b013e31825dc20a $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22929246
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Haninec, Pavel $u Department of Neurosurgery, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. pavel.haninec@fnkv.cz
245    12
$a A Comparison of collateral sprouting of sensory and motor axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy with and without the perineurial window / $c P. Haninec, R. Kaiser, P. Dubový,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Many experimental studies have confirmed collateral sprouting of axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy and its possible clinical application. There is still controversy about how the surgical method should be carried out. The aim of the present study was to quantitatively evaluate collateral sprouting of motor and sensory axons after end-to-side neurorrhaphy with and without the perineurial window. METHODS: End-to-side neurorrhaphy of the distal stump of transected musculocutaneous nerve with intact ulnar nerve with or without a perineurial window was performed in a rat model. Collateral sprouts were quantitatively evaluated by counting of motor and sensory neurons following their retrograde labeling by Fluoro-Ruby and Fluoro-Emerald applied to the ulnar and musculocutaneous nerves, respectively. RESULTS: Our results show that significantly more motor and sensory axons sent their collateral branches into the recipient nerve in the group with a perineurial window. Some axons were injured during preparation of the perineurial window; the injured axons reinnervated directly into the recipient nerve to contribute to results of functional reinnervation. CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that it is necessary to create a perineurial window when using end-to-side neurorrhaphy in clinical practice, especially in brachial plexus reconstruction.
650    _2
$a anastomóza chirurgická $7 D000714
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a axony $7 D001369
650    _2
$a spinální ganglia $x cytologie $7 D005727
650    _2
$a péče o zevnějšek u zvířat $x fyziologie $7 D006120
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a motorické neurony $x cytologie $7 D009046
650    _2
$a nervus musculocutaneus $x cytologie $x růst a vývoj $x chirurgie $7 D009138
650    _2
$a periferní nervy $x cytologie $x chirurgie $7 D010525
650    _2
$a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
650    _2
$a potkani Wistar $7 D017208
650    _2
$a nervové receptory $x cytologie $7 D011984
650    _2
$a nervus ulnaris $x cytologie $x růst a vývoj $7 D014459
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kaiser, Radek
700    1_
$a Dubový, Petr
773    0_
$w MED00010436 $t Plastic and reconstructive surgery $x 1529-4242 $g Roč. 130, č. 3 (2012), s. 609-14
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22929246 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130111094441 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963381 $s 798763
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 130 $c 3 $d 609-14 $i 1529-4242 $m Plastic and reconstructive surgery $n Plast Reconstr Surg $x MED00010436
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...