Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: complications and inflammatory response

J. Martínek, O. Ryska, T. Filípková, R. Doležel, S. Juhas, J. Motlík, M. Holubová, V. Nosek, B. Rotnáglová, M. Zavoral, M. Ryska,

. 2012 ; 18 (27) : 3558-64.

Jazyk angličtina Země Tchaj-wan

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13000642

AIM: To compare natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs standard laparoscopic ovariectomy in mini pigs with respect to technical aspects, complications and parameters of systemic inflammatory response. METHODS: This was a randomized, experimental, survival study. Ten female mini pigs underwent NOTES transgastric ovariectomy (NOTES group) and ten female mini pigs underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy (LAP group). A "percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" approach with guidewire and sphincterotome was used for gastrotomy creation. The ovary was resected using standard biopsy forceps and a snare. The access site was closed using a "KING" closure with a single endoloop and several clips. In the laparoscopic group, a three-port laparoscopy and an ovariectomy were performed with the use of standard laparoscopic devices. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count and interleukin (IL)-6 plasma levels were used as indicators of systemic inflammatory response. All animals were euthanized 28 d after surgery. RESULTS: All animals survived without complications. The mean procedure time was 41.3 min ± 17.6 min (NOTES group) and 25.7 min ± 5.25 min (LAP group, P < 0.02). Postmortem examinations demonstrated that 50% and 70% of animals were free of any complications in the NOTES and LAP groups, respectively. The remaining animals developed minor complications (adhesions) in a comparable frequency between the two groups. In the NOTES group, one animal developed a small intramural gastric abscess close to the gastrotomy site. A minor serous exudate that was present in 50% and 40% of the animals in the NOTES and laparoscopy groups, respectively, was not considered a complication. In both groups CRP levels increased significantly on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days (POD) and returned to normal after 28 d. On POD 2, an increase of CRP level was significantly higher in the NOTES group compared to the LAP group. Values of IL-6 did not differ from baseline values in either of the groups postoperatively. Interestingly, the platelet count decreased significantly on POD 2, but returned close to baseline values on POD 7 and PODs 28-30. CONCLUSION: Both NOTES and laparoscopic ovariectomies had a similar frequency of minor complications. However, the NOTES technique produced an increased systemic inflammatory response on POD 2.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000642
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130111105550.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2012 ch f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3558 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22826620
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ch
100    1_
$a Martínek, Jan $u Department of Internal Medicine, University Military Hospital, 16000 Prague, Charles University, Czech Republic. jan.martinek@volny.cz
245    10
$a Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery vs laparoscopic ovariectomy: complications and inflammatory response / $c J. Martínek, O. Ryska, T. Filípková, R. Doležel, S. Juhas, J. Motlík, M. Holubová, V. Nosek, B. Rotnáglová, M. Zavoral, M. Ryska,
520    9_
$a AIM: To compare natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) vs standard laparoscopic ovariectomy in mini pigs with respect to technical aspects, complications and parameters of systemic inflammatory response. METHODS: This was a randomized, experimental, survival study. Ten female mini pigs underwent NOTES transgastric ovariectomy (NOTES group) and ten female mini pigs underwent laparoscopic ovariectomy (LAP group). A "percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy" approach with guidewire and sphincterotome was used for gastrotomy creation. The ovary was resected using standard biopsy forceps and a snare. The access site was closed using a "KING" closure with a single endoloop and several clips. In the laparoscopic group, a three-port laparoscopy and an ovariectomy were performed with the use of standard laparoscopic devices. C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood count and interleukin (IL)-6 plasma levels were used as indicators of systemic inflammatory response. All animals were euthanized 28 d after surgery. RESULTS: All animals survived without complications. The mean procedure time was 41.3 min ± 17.6 min (NOTES group) and 25.7 min ± 5.25 min (LAP group, P < 0.02). Postmortem examinations demonstrated that 50% and 70% of animals were free of any complications in the NOTES and LAP groups, respectively. The remaining animals developed minor complications (adhesions) in a comparable frequency between the two groups. In the NOTES group, one animal developed a small intramural gastric abscess close to the gastrotomy site. A minor serous exudate that was present in 50% and 40% of the animals in the NOTES and laparoscopy groups, respectively, was not considered a complication. In both groups CRP levels increased significantly on the 2nd and 7th postoperative days (POD) and returned to normal after 28 d. On POD 2, an increase of CRP level was significantly higher in the NOTES group compared to the LAP group. Values of IL-6 did not differ from baseline values in either of the groups postoperatively. Interestingly, the platelet count decreased significantly on POD 2, but returned close to baseline values on POD 7 and PODs 28-30. CONCLUSION: Both NOTES and laparoscopic ovariectomies had a similar frequency of minor complications. However, the NOTES technique produced an increased systemic inflammatory response on POD 2.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biologické markery $x krev $7 D015415
650    _2
$a C-reaktivní protein $x metabolismus $7 D002097
650    _2
$a design vybavení $7 D004867
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a zánět $x krev $x etiologie $x imunologie $7 D007249
650    _2
$a mediátory zánětu $x krev $7 D018836
650    _2
$a interleukin-6 $x krev $7 D015850
650    _2
$a laparoskopie $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D010535
650    _2
$a počet leukocytů $7 D007958
650    _2
$a endoskopické operace přirozenými otvory $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D057605
650    _2
$a ovarektomie $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D010052
650    _2
$a počet trombocytů $7 D010976
650    _2
$a chirurgické nástroje $7 D013525
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
650    _2
$a miniaturní prasata $7 D013556
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Ryska, Ondřej
700    1_
$a Filípková, Tereza
700    1_
$a Doležel, Radek
700    1_
$a Juhas, Stefan
700    1_
$a Motlík, Jan
700    1_
$a Holubová, Monika
700    1_
$a Nosek, Vladimír
700    1_
$a Rotnáglová, Barbora
700    1_
$a Zavoral, Miroslav
700    1_
$a Ryska, Miroslav
773    0_
$w MED00006918 $t World journal of gastroenterology : WJG $x 1007-9327 $g Roč. 18, č. 27 (2012), s. 3558-64
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22826620 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130111105656 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963424 $s 798806
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 18 $c 27 $d 3558-64 $i 1007-9327 $m World journal of gastroenterology $n World J Gastroenterol $x MED00006918
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...