• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

On-line preconcentration of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid by nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis

R. Knob, V. Maier, J. Petr, V. Ranc, J. Sevčík,

. 2012 ; 33 (14) : 2159-66.

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13000644

Separation of major environmental pollutants as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) by capillary electrophoresis is reported for the first time. It is not possible to resolve the solutes in an aqueous media. However, the use of methanol and acetonitrile as the background electrolyte (BGE) solvents allowed their rapid separation in an uncoated capillary. A major effort was put into BGE optimization in respect to both separation efficiency and detection for further on-line preconcentration. 5 mmol.L⁻¹ naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid and 10 mmol.L⁻¹ triethylamine dissolved in ACN/MeOH (50:50 v/v) provided best separation and detection conditions. Next, the large-volume sample stacking and the field-amplified sample injection were applied and compared. Large-volume sample stacking improved limits of detection (LODs) with regard to the standard injection by 69 times for PFOA and 143 times for PFOS with LODs of 280 and 230 nmol.L⁻¹, respectively. Field-amplified sample injection improved LODs 624 times for PFOAand 806 times for PFOS with LODs 31 and 40 nmol.L⁻¹, respectively. Both preconcentration methods showed repeatabilities of migration times less than 1.2% RSD intraday and 6.6% RSD interday. The method was applied on PFOA and PFOS analysis in a sample of river water treated with solid-phase extraction, which further improved LOD toward 5.6 × 10⁻¹⁰ mol.L⁻¹ for PFOS and 6.4 × 10⁻¹⁰ mol.L⁻¹ for PFOA and allows the method to be used for river water contamination screening or decomposition studies.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000644
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130109115456.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2012 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/elps.201100665 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22821493
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Knob, Radim $u Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Palacky University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic. rknob@seznam.cz
245    10
$a On-line preconcentration of perfluorooctanoic acid and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid by nonaqueous capillary electrophoresis / $c R. Knob, V. Maier, J. Petr, V. Ranc, J. Sevčík,
520    9_
$a Separation of major environmental pollutants as perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) by capillary electrophoresis is reported for the first time. It is not possible to resolve the solutes in an aqueous media. However, the use of methanol and acetonitrile as the background electrolyte (BGE) solvents allowed their rapid separation in an uncoated capillary. A major effort was put into BGE optimization in respect to both separation efficiency and detection for further on-line preconcentration. 5 mmol.L⁻¹ naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid and 10 mmol.L⁻¹ triethylamine dissolved in ACN/MeOH (50:50 v/v) provided best separation and detection conditions. Next, the large-volume sample stacking and the field-amplified sample injection were applied and compared. Large-volume sample stacking improved limits of detection (LODs) with regard to the standard injection by 69 times for PFOA and 143 times for PFOS with LODs of 280 and 230 nmol.L⁻¹, respectively. Field-amplified sample injection improved LODs 624 times for PFOAand 806 times for PFOS with LODs 31 and 40 nmol.L⁻¹, respectively. Both preconcentration methods showed repeatabilities of migration times less than 1.2% RSD intraday and 6.6% RSD interday. The method was applied on PFOA and PFOS analysis in a sample of river water treated with solid-phase extraction, which further improved LOD toward 5.6 × 10⁻¹⁰ mol.L⁻¹ for PFOS and 6.4 × 10⁻¹⁰ mol.L⁻¹ for PFOA and allows the method to be used for river water contamination screening or decomposition studies.
650    _2
$a acetonitrily $7 D000097
650    _2
$a kyseliny alkansulfonové $x izolace a purifikace $7 D017738
650    _2
$a kapryláty $x izolace a purifikace $7 D002210
650    _2
$a elektroforéza kapilární $x metody $7 D019075
650    _2
$a fluorokarbony $x izolace a purifikace $7 D005466
650    _2
$a limita detekce $7 D057230
650    _2
$a methanol $7 D000432
650    _2
$a řeky $x chemie $7 D045483
650    _2
$a extrakce na pevné fázi $7 D052616
650    _2
$a rozpouštědla $7 D012997
650    _2
$a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x izolace a purifikace $7 D014874
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Maier, Vítězslav
700    1_
$a Petr, Jan
700    1_
$a Ranc, Václav
700    1_
$a Sevčík, Juraj
773    0_
$w MED00001508 $t Electrophoresis $x 1522-2683 $g Roč. 33, č. 14 (2012), s. 2159-66
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22821493 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130109115601 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963426 $s 798808
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 33 $c 14 $d 2159-66 $i 1522-2683 $m Electrophoresis $n Electrophoresis $x MED00001508
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...