-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fibrosis newborn screening protocols in the Czech Republic: IRT/DNA/IRT versus IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA
V. Krulišová, M. Balaščaková, V. Skalická, T. Piskáčková, A. Holubová, J. Paděrová, P. Křenková, L. Dvořáková, D. Zemková, P. Kračmar, B. Chovancová, V. Vávrová, A. Stambergová, F. Votava, M. Macek,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NS9986
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Část
Zdroj
NLK
ProQuest Central
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2012-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 1997-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 1996-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
- MeSH
- antigeny nádorové krev MeSH
- biologické markery krev MeSH
- cystická fibróza krev diagnóza genetika MeSH
- falešně negativní reakce MeSH
- falešně pozitivní reakce MeSH
- genetické markery MeSH
- klinické protokoly MeSH
- lektiny typu C krev MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mutační analýza DNA MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery krev MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- novorozenecký screening metody MeSH
- pot chemie MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- protein CFTR genetika MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- test suché kapky krve MeSH
- trypsinogen krev MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- novorozenec MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease for which early diagnosis following newborn screening (NBS) improves the prognosis. We performed a prospective assessment of the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT)/DNA/IRT protocol currently in use nationwide, versus the IRT/pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) and IRT/PAP/DNA CF NBS protocols. Dried blood spots (DBS) from 106,522 Czech newborns were examined for IRT concentrations. In the IRT/DNA/IRT protocol, DNA-testing was performed for IRT ≥ 65 ng/mL. Newborns with IRT ≥ 200 ng/mL and no detected cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) mutations were recalled for a repeat IRT. In the same group of newborns, for both parallel protocols, PAP was measured in DBS with IRT ≥ 50 ng/mL. In PAP-positive newborns (i.e., ≥1.8 if IRT 50-99.9 or ≥1.0 if IRT ≥ 100, all in ng/mL), DNA-testing followed as part of the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol. Newborns with at least one CFTR mutation in the IRT/DNA/IRT and IRT/PAP/DNA protocols; a positive PAP in IRT/PAP; or a high repeat IRT in IRT/DNA/IRT were referred for sweat testing. CONCLUSION: the combined results of the utilized protocols led to the detection of 21 CF patients, 19 of which were identified using the IRT/DNA/IRT protocol, 16 using IRT/PAP, and 15 using IRT/PAP/DNA. Decreased cut-offs for PAP within the IRT/PAP protocol would lead to higher sensitivity but would increase false positives. Within the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol, decreased PAP cut-offs would result in high sensitivity, an acceptable number of false positives, and would reduce the number of DNA analyses. Thus, we concluded that the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol would represent the most suitable protocol in our conditions.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13000813
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20141017124925.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2012 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00431-012-1747-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22581207
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Krulišová, Veronika $u Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, University Hospital Motol and the 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, V Úvalu 84, 15006 Prague 5, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Prospective and parallel assessments of cystic fibrosis newborn screening protocols in the Czech Republic: IRT/DNA/IRT versus IRT/PAP and IRT/PAP/DNA / $c V. Krulišová, M. Balaščaková, V. Skalická, T. Piskáčková, A. Holubová, J. Paděrová, P. Křenková, L. Dvořáková, D. Zemková, P. Kračmar, B. Chovancová, V. Vávrová, A. Stambergová, F. Votava, M. Macek,
- 520 9_
- $a Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-threatening disease for which early diagnosis following newborn screening (NBS) improves the prognosis. We performed a prospective assessment of the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT)/DNA/IRT protocol currently in use nationwide, versus the IRT/pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) and IRT/PAP/DNA CF NBS protocols. Dried blood spots (DBS) from 106,522 Czech newborns were examined for IRT concentrations. In the IRT/DNA/IRT protocol, DNA-testing was performed for IRT ≥ 65 ng/mL. Newborns with IRT ≥ 200 ng/mL and no detected cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) mutations were recalled for a repeat IRT. In the same group of newborns, for both parallel protocols, PAP was measured in DBS with IRT ≥ 50 ng/mL. In PAP-positive newborns (i.e., ≥1.8 if IRT 50-99.9 or ≥1.0 if IRT ≥ 100, all in ng/mL), DNA-testing followed as part of the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol. Newborns with at least one CFTR mutation in the IRT/DNA/IRT and IRT/PAP/DNA protocols; a positive PAP in IRT/PAP; or a high repeat IRT in IRT/DNA/IRT were referred for sweat testing. CONCLUSION: the combined results of the utilized protocols led to the detection of 21 CF patients, 19 of which were identified using the IRT/DNA/IRT protocol, 16 using IRT/PAP, and 15 using IRT/PAP/DNA. Decreased cut-offs for PAP within the IRT/PAP protocol would lead to higher sensitivity but would increase false positives. Within the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol, decreased PAP cut-offs would result in high sensitivity, an acceptable number of false positives, and would reduce the number of DNA analyses. Thus, we concluded that the IRT/PAP/DNA protocol would represent the most suitable protocol in our conditions.
- 650 _2
- $a antigeny nádorové $x krev $7 D000951
- 650 _2
- $a biologické markery $x krev $7 D015415
- 650 _2
- $a klinické protokoly $7 D002985
- 650 _2
- $a cystická fibróza $x krev $x diagnóza $x genetika $7 D003550
- 650 _2
- $a protein CFTR $x genetika $7 D019005
- 650 _2
- $a mutační analýza DNA $7 D004252
- 650 _2
- $a test suché kapky krve $7 D059788
- 650 _2
- $a falešně negativní reakce $7 D005188
- 650 _2
- $a falešně pozitivní reakce $7 D005189
- 650 _2
- $a genetické markery $7 D005819
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a novorozenec $7 D007231
- 650 _2
- $a lektiny typu C $x krev $7 D037181
- 650 _2
- $a novorozenecký screening $x metody $7 D015997
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a pot $x chemie $7 D013542
- 650 _2
- $a trypsinogen $x krev $7 D014362
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x krev $7 D014408
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky $7 D016430
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Balaščaková, Miroslava
- 700 1_
- $a Skalická, Veronika
- 700 1_
- $a Piskáčková, Tereza
- 700 1_
- $a Holubová, Andrea
- 700 1_
- $a Paděrová, Jana
- 700 1_
- $a Křenková, Petra
- 700 1_
- $a Dvořáková, Lenka
- 700 1_
- $a Zemková, Dana
- 700 1_
- $a Kračmar, Petr
- 700 1_
- $a Chovancová, Blanka
- 700 1_
- $a Vávrová, Věra
- 700 1_
- $a Stambergová, Alexandra
- 700 1_
- $a Votava, Felix
- 700 1_
- $a Macek, Milan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009638 $t European journal of pediatrics $x 1432-1076 $g Roč. 171, č. 8 (2012), s. 1223-9
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22581207 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20141017125319 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963595 $s 798977
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 171 $c 8 $d 1223-9 $i 1432-1076 $m European journal of pediatrics $n Eur J Pediatr $x MED00009638
- GRA __
- $a NS9986 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108