-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The use of continuous glucose monitoring combined with computer-based eMPC algorithm for tight glucose control in cardiosurgical ICU
P. Kopecký, M. Mráz, J. Bláha, J. Lindner, S. Svačina, R. Hovorka, M. Haluzík,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2013
PubMed Central
od 2013
Europe PubMed Central
od 2013
ProQuest Central
od 2013
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2012-12-04
Open Access Digital Library
od 2013-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2013-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2013-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2013
Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles
od 2001
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2013
PubMed
23555075
DOI
10.1155/2013/186439
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- algoritmy MeSH
- diabetes mellitus 1. typu krev chirurgie MeSH
- intravenózní infuze MeSH
- inzulin aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- jednotky intenzivní péče MeSH
- krevní glukóza analýza MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- pooperační období MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
AIM: In postcardiac surgery patients, we assessed the performance of a system for intensive intravenous insulin therapy using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and enhanced model predictive control (eMPC) algorithm. METHODS: Glucose control in eMPC-CGM group (n = 12) was compared with a control (C) group (n = 12) treated by intravenous insulin infusion adjusted according to eMPC protocol with a variable sampling interval alone. In the eMPC-CGM group glucose measured with a REAL-Time CGM system (Guardian RT) served as input for the eMPC adjusting insulin infusion every 15 minutes. The accuracy of CGM was evaluated hourly using reference arterial glucose and Clarke error-grid analysis (C-EGA). Target glucose range was 4.4-6.1 mmol/L. RESULTS: Of the 277 paired CGM-reference glycemic values, 270 (97.5%) were in clinically acceptable zones of C-EGA and only 7 (2.5%) were in unacceptable D zone. Glucose control in eMPC-CGM group was comparable to C group in all measured values (average glycemia, percentage of time above, within, and below target range,). No episode of hypoglycemia (<2.9 mmol) occurred in eMPC-CGM group compared to 2 in C group. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the combination of eMPC algorithm with CGM is reliable and accurate enough to test this approach in a larger study population.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13031507
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171023183259.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 131002s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1155/2013/186439 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23555075
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kopecký, Petr $u Department of Anaesthesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic. $7 xx0135702
- 245 14
- $a The use of continuous glucose monitoring combined with computer-based eMPC algorithm for tight glucose control in cardiosurgical ICU / $c P. Kopecký, M. Mráz, J. Bláha, J. Lindner, S. Svačina, R. Hovorka, M. Haluzík,
- 520 9_
- $a AIM: In postcardiac surgery patients, we assessed the performance of a system for intensive intravenous insulin therapy using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and enhanced model predictive control (eMPC) algorithm. METHODS: Glucose control in eMPC-CGM group (n = 12) was compared with a control (C) group (n = 12) treated by intravenous insulin infusion adjusted according to eMPC protocol with a variable sampling interval alone. In the eMPC-CGM group glucose measured with a REAL-Time CGM system (Guardian RT) served as input for the eMPC adjusting insulin infusion every 15 minutes. The accuracy of CGM was evaluated hourly using reference arterial glucose and Clarke error-grid analysis (C-EGA). Target glucose range was 4.4-6.1 mmol/L. RESULTS: Of the 277 paired CGM-reference glycemic values, 270 (97.5%) were in clinically acceptable zones of C-EGA and only 7 (2.5%) were in unacceptable D zone. Glucose control in eMPC-CGM group was comparable to C group in all measured values (average glycemia, percentage of time above, within, and below target range,). No episode of hypoglycemia (<2.9 mmol) occurred in eMPC-CGM group compared to 2 in C group. CONCLUSION: Our data show that the combination of eMPC algorithm with CGM is reliable and accurate enough to test this approach in a larger study population.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a algoritmy $7 D000465
- 650 _2
- $a krevní glukóza $x analýza $7 D001786
- 650 _2
- $a diabetes mellitus 1. typu $x krev $x chirurgie $7 D003922
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a intravenózní infuze $7 D007262
- 650 _2
- $a inzulin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D007328
- 650 _2
- $a jednotky intenzivní péče $7 D007362
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pooperační období $7 D011184
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mráz, Miloš $u Third Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 1, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic $7 xx0119173
- 700 1_
- $a Bláha, Jan, $u Department of Anaesthesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic $d 1968- $7 xx0134727
- 700 1_
- $a Lindner, Jaroslav, $u Department of Cardiac Surgery, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 2, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic $d 1957- $7 mzk2005269705
- 700 1_
- $a Svačina, Štěpán, $u Third Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 1, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic $d 1952- $7 jn20000402316
- 700 1_
- $a Hovorka, Roman, $u Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Box 289, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK $d 1960- $7 xx0134449
- 700 1_
- $a Haluzík, Martin, $u Third Department of Medicine, 1st Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, U Nemocnice 1, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic $d 1970- $7 xx0000707
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182164 $t BioMed research international $x 2314-6141 $g Roč. 2013(2013), s. 186439
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23555075 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20131002 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171023183253 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 995594 $s 829952
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 2013 $d 186439 $i 2314-6141 $m BioMed research international $n Biomed Res Int $x MED00182164
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20131002