-
Something wrong with this record ?
Duration of the first steps of the human rRNA processing
A. Popov, E. Smirnov, L. Kováčik, O. Raška, G. Hagen, L. Stixová, I. Raška,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2010 to 1 year ago
PubMed Central
from 2010
Europe PubMed Central
from 2010 to 1 year ago
Taylor & Francis Open Access
from 2010-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-11-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
PubMed
23412654
DOI
10.4161/nucl.23985
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- NIH 3T3 Cells MeSH
- Dactinomycin pharmacology MeSH
- Transcription, Genetic drug effects MeSH
- HeLa Cells MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional genetics MeSH
- RNA Precursors * genetics metabolism MeSH
- RNA, Ribosomal genetics MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Mice MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Processing of rRNA in mammalian cells includes a series of cleavages of the primary 47S transcript and results in producing three rRNAs: 18S, 28S and 5.8S. The sequence of the main processing events in human cells has been established, but little is yet known about the dynamics of this process, especially the dynamics of its early stages. In the present study, we used real-time PCR to measure levels of pre-rRNA after inhibition of transcription with actinomycin D. Thus we could estimate the half-life time of rRNA transcripts in two human-derived cell lines, HeLa and LEP (human embryonic fibroblasts), as well as in mouse NIH 3T3 cells. The primary transcripts seemed to be more stable in the human than in the murine cells. Remarkably, the graphs in all cases showed more or less pronounced lag phase, which may reflect preparatory events preceding the first cleavage of the pre-rRNA. Additionally, we followed the dynamics of the decay of the 5'ETS fragment which is degraded only after the formation of 41S rRNA. According to our estimates, the corresponding three (or four) steps of the processing in human cells take five to eight minutes.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13031601
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20131008110648.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 131002s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.4161/nucl.23985 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23412654
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Popov, Alexey $u First Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Cellular Biology and Pathology, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Duration of the first steps of the human rRNA processing / $c A. Popov, E. Smirnov, L. Kováčik, O. Raška, G. Hagen, L. Stixová, I. Raška,
- 520 9_
- $a Processing of rRNA in mammalian cells includes a series of cleavages of the primary 47S transcript and results in producing three rRNAs: 18S, 28S and 5.8S. The sequence of the main processing events in human cells has been established, but little is yet known about the dynamics of this process, especially the dynamics of its early stages. In the present study, we used real-time PCR to measure levels of pre-rRNA after inhibition of transcription with actinomycin D. Thus we could estimate the half-life time of rRNA transcripts in two human-derived cell lines, HeLa and LEP (human embryonic fibroblasts), as well as in mouse NIH 3T3 cells. The primary transcripts seemed to be more stable in the human than in the murine cells. Remarkably, the graphs in all cases showed more or less pronounced lag phase, which may reflect preparatory events preceding the first cleavage of the pre-rRNA. Additionally, we followed the dynamics of the decay of the 5'ETS fragment which is degraded only after the formation of 41S rRNA. According to our estimates, the corresponding three (or four) steps of the processing in human cells take five to eight minutes.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a daktinomycin $x farmakologie $7 D003609
- 650 _2
- $a HeLa buňky $7 D006367
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a myši $7 D051379
- 650 _2
- $a buňky NIH 3T3 $7 D041681
- 650 12
- $a prekurzory RNA $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D012322
- 650 _2
- $a posttranskripční úpravy RNA $x genetika $7 D012323
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální $x genetika $7 D012335
- 650 _2
- $a genetická transkripce $x účinky léků $7 D014158
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Smirnov, Evgeny $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Kováčik, Lubomír $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Raška, Otakar $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Hagen, Guy $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Stixová, Lenka $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Raška, Ivan $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180459 $t Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) $x 1949-1042 $g Roč. 4, č. 2 (2013), s. 134-41
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23412654 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20131002 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20131008111210 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 995688 $s 830046
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 4 $c 2 $d 134-41 $i 1949-1042 $m Nucleus $n Nucleus $x MED00180459
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20131002