Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Recolonization of bat roost by bat bugs (Cimex pipistrelli): could parasite load be a cause of bat roost switching?

T. Bartonička, L. Růžičková,

. 2013 ; 112 (4) : 1615-22.

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13031639

Roost ectoparasites are believed to have a negative impact on fitness of their hosts as birds or mammals. Previous studies were mostly focussed on the synchronization between reproduction cycles of ectoparasites and hosts living in infested roosts. However, to date, it has not been examined how fast ectoparasites colonize new, non-infested roosts and thus increasing the impact on the local populations of hosts. The parasite-host model was studied, including bat bugs Cimex pipistrelli and soprano pipistrelles Pipistrellus pygmaeus, where bat behaviour was observed which tended to reduce the parasite load in bat roosts. We investigated (1) whether bats change their roosting behaviour when we discontinued synchronization of their reproduction and the life cycle of the bat bugs and (2) how fast and which stages of bat bugs reoccupy cleaned roosts. In a 3-year field experiment, we removed all bat bugs from six bat boxes in each spring. Pipistrelles bred young in all non-infested boxes during these 3 years. In addition, 8 years of regular observations before this experiment indicate that bats avoided breeding in the same bat boxes at all. Bat bugs were found again in clean boxes in mid-May. However, their densities did not maximise before the beginning of June, before parturition. A re-appearance of bugs was observed after 21-56 days after the first bat visit. Adult bugs, mainly females, colonised cleaned boxes first though at the same time there were a lot of younger and smaller instars in non-manipulated roosts in the vicinity.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13031639
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20131008114403.0
007      
ta
008      
131002s2013 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00436-013-3316-4 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23385971
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Bartonička, Tomáš $u Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 2, 61137, Brno, Czech Republic. bartonic@sci.muni.cz
245    10
$a Recolonization of bat roost by bat bugs (Cimex pipistrelli): could parasite load be a cause of bat roost switching? / $c T. Bartonička, L. Růžičková,
520    9_
$a Roost ectoparasites are believed to have a negative impact on fitness of their hosts as birds or mammals. Previous studies were mostly focussed on the synchronization between reproduction cycles of ectoparasites and hosts living in infested roosts. However, to date, it has not been examined how fast ectoparasites colonize new, non-infested roosts and thus increasing the impact on the local populations of hosts. The parasite-host model was studied, including bat bugs Cimex pipistrelli and soprano pipistrelles Pipistrellus pygmaeus, where bat behaviour was observed which tended to reduce the parasite load in bat roosts. We investigated (1) whether bats change their roosting behaviour when we discontinued synchronization of their reproduction and the life cycle of the bat bugs and (2) how fast and which stages of bat bugs reoccupy cleaned roosts. In a 3-year field experiment, we removed all bat bugs from six bat boxes in each spring. Pipistrelles bred young in all non-infested boxes during these 3 years. In addition, 8 years of regular observations before this experiment indicate that bats avoided breeding in the same bat boxes at all. Bat bugs were found again in clean boxes in mid-May. However, their densities did not maximise before the beginning of June, before parturition. A re-appearance of bugs was observed after 21-56 days after the first bat visit. Adult bugs, mainly females, colonised cleaned boxes first though at the same time there were a lot of younger and smaller instars in non-manipulated roosts in the vicinity.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a štěnice $x růst a vývoj $7 D001511
650    _2
$a Chiroptera $x parazitologie $x fyziologie $7 D002685
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a interakce hostitele a parazita $7 D006790
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a parazitární zátěž $7 D059208
650    _2
$a sexuální chování zvířat $7 D012726
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Růžičková, Lucie $u -
773    0_
$w MED00003691 $t Parasitology research $x 1432-1955 $g Roč. 112, č. 4 (2013), s. 1615-22
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23385971 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20131002 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20131008114925 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 995726 $s 830084
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 112 $c 4 $d 1615-22 $i 1432-1955 $m Parasitology research $n Parasitol Res $x MED00003691
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20131002

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...