-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Applicability and limitations of affinity capillary electrophoresis and vacancy affinity capillary electrophoresis methods for determination of complexation constants
M. Dvořák, J. Svobodová, M. Beneš, B. Gaš,
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
23254978
DOI
10.1002/elps.201200581
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- beta-cyklodextriny chemie MeSH
- chemické modely MeSH
- elektroforéza kapilární metody MeSH
- elektrolyty chemie MeSH
- počítačová simulace MeSH
- pufry MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
ACE and vacancy affinity capillary electrophoresis (VACE) are the commonly used methods for determination of complexation constants by CE. The applicability and limitations of these methods were tested experimentally and by means of simulations using our simulation software Simul 5 Complex. It was shown that while the ACE method provides reliable and precise values of complexation parameters, those determined by VACE can be incorrect especially in the case of strong complexation. The effective mobilities of the system peaks in the VACE method, and consequently, the resulting complexation parameters were found to be a function of concentration of the analyte present in the BGE. Development of system peaks in VACE is discussed in the frame of the linear theory of electromigration. Dependence of mobility of system peaks on the composition of the BGE cannot be characterized by a simple analytical expression as in the case of ACE method. Thus, the VACE method fails and the resulting complexation constants might seriously differ from the reality.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13031757
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20131002114443.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 131002s2013 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/elps.201200581 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23254978
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Dvořák, Martin $u Faculty of Science, Department of Physical and Macromolecular Chemistry, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Applicability and limitations of affinity capillary electrophoresis and vacancy affinity capillary electrophoresis methods for determination of complexation constants / $c M. Dvořák, J. Svobodová, M. Beneš, B. Gaš,
- 520 9_
- $a ACE and vacancy affinity capillary electrophoresis (VACE) are the commonly used methods for determination of complexation constants by CE. The applicability and limitations of these methods were tested experimentally and by means of simulations using our simulation software Simul 5 Complex. It was shown that while the ACE method provides reliable and precise values of complexation parameters, those determined by VACE can be incorrect especially in the case of strong complexation. The effective mobilities of the system peaks in the VACE method, and consequently, the resulting complexation parameters were found to be a function of concentration of the analyte present in the BGE. Development of system peaks in VACE is discussed in the frame of the linear theory of electromigration. Dependence of mobility of system peaks on the composition of the BGE cannot be characterized by a simple analytical expression as in the case of ACE method. Thus, the VACE method fails and the resulting complexation constants might seriously differ from the reality.
- 650 _2
- $a pufry $7 D002021
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová simulace $7 D003198
- 650 _2
- $a elektrolyty $x chemie $7 D004573
- 650 _2
- $a elektroforéza kapilární $x metody $7 D019075
- 650 _2
- $a chemické modely $7 D008956
- 650 _2
- $a beta-cyklodextriny $x chemie $7 D047392
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Svobodová, Jana $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Beneš, Martin $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Gaš, Bohuslav $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001508 $t Electrophoresis $x 1522-2683 $g Roč. 34, č. 5 (2013), s. 761-7
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23254978 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20131002 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20131002115000 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 995844 $s 830202
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 34 $c 5 $d 761-7 $i 1522-2683 $m Electrophoresis $n Electrophoresis $x MED00001508
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20131002