Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Residual disease monitoring in childhood acute myeloid leukemia by multiparameter flow cytometry: the MRD-AML-BFM Study Group

C Langebrake, U Creutzig, M Dworzak, O Hrusak, E Mejstrikova, F Griesinger, M Zimmermann, D Reinhardt

. 2006 ; 24 (22) : 3686-3692.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13032712

Grantová podpora
NR8269 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

PURPOSE: Monitoring of residual disease (RD) by flow cytometry in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may predict outcome. However, the optimal time points for investigation, the best antibody combinations, and most importantly, the clinical impact of RD analysis remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred forty-two specimens of 150 children enrolled in the AML-Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM) 98 study were analyzed by four-color immunophenotyping at up to four predefined time points during treatment. For each of the 12 leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and time points, a threshold level based on a previous retrospective analysis of another cohort of children with AML and on control bone marrows was determined. RESULTS: Regarding all four time points, there is a statistically significant difference in the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) in those children presenting with immunologically detectable blasts at 3 or more time points. The levels at bone marrow puncture (BMP) 1 and BMP2 turned out to have the most significant predictive value for 3-year-EFS: 71% +/- 6% versus 48% +/- 9%, P(Log-Rank) = .029 and 70% +/- 6% versus 50% +/- 7%, P(Log-Rank) = .033), resulting in a more than two-fold risk of relapse. In a multivariate analysis, using a combined risk classification based on morphologically determined blasts at BMP1 and BMP2, French-American-British classification, and cytogenetics, the influence of immunologically determined RD was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: RD monitoring before second induction has the same predictive value as examining levels at four different time points during intensive chemotherapy. Compared with commonly defined risk factors in the AML-BFM studies, flow cytometry does not provide additional information for outcome prediction, but may be helpful to evaluate the remission status at day 28.

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13032712
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190104125253.0
007      
ta
008      
131009s2006 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)16877738
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Langebrake, Claudia
245    10
$a Residual disease monitoring in childhood acute myeloid leukemia by multiparameter flow cytometry: the MRD-AML-BFM Study Group / $c C Langebrake, U Creutzig, M Dworzak, O Hrusak, E Mejstrikova, F Griesinger, M Zimmermann, D Reinhardt
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Monitoring of residual disease (RD) by flow cytometry in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) may predict outcome. However, the optimal time points for investigation, the best antibody combinations, and most importantly, the clinical impact of RD analysis remain unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred forty-two specimens of 150 children enrolled in the AML-Berlin-Frankfurt-Muenster (BFM) 98 study were analyzed by four-color immunophenotyping at up to four predefined time points during treatment. For each of the 12 leukemia-associated immunophenotypes and time points, a threshold level based on a previous retrospective analysis of another cohort of children with AML and on control bone marrows was determined. RESULTS: Regarding all four time points, there is a statistically significant difference in the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) in those children presenting with immunologically detectable blasts at 3 or more time points. The levels at bone marrow puncture (BMP) 1 and BMP2 turned out to have the most significant predictive value for 3-year-EFS: 71% +/- 6% versus 48% +/- 9%, P(Log-Rank) = .029 and 70% +/- 6% versus 50% +/- 7%, P(Log-Rank) = .033), resulting in a more than two-fold risk of relapse. In a multivariate analysis, using a combined risk classification based on morphologically determined blasts at BMP1 and BMP2, French-American-British classification, and cytogenetics, the influence of immunologically determined RD was no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: RD monitoring before second induction has the same predictive value as examining levels at four different time points during intensive chemotherapy. Compared with commonly defined risk factors in the AML-BFM studies, flow cytometry does not provide additional information for outcome prediction, but may be helpful to evaluate the remission status at day 28.
590    __
$a bohemika - dle Pubmed
650    02
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    02
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    02
$a analýza rozptylu $7 D000704
650    02
$a protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie $x terapeutické užití $7 D000971
650    02
$a kostní dřeň $x patologie $7 D001853
650    02
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    02
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    02
$a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
650    02
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a průtoková cytometrie $7 D005434
650    02
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    02
$a kojenec $7 D007223
650    12
$a akutní myeloidní leukemie $x diagnóza $x farmakoterapie $7 D015470
650    02
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a reziduální nádor $x diagnóza $7 D018365
650    02
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    02
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    02
$a proporcionální rizikové modely $7 D016016
650    02
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    02
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    02
$a analýza přežití $7 D016019
650    02
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Creutzig, Ursula
700    1_
$a Dworzak, Michael
700    1_
$a Hrušák, Ondřej, $d 1965- $7 xx0036691
700    1_
$a Mejstříková, Ester, $d 1977- $7 xx0105223
700    1_
$a Griesinger, Frank
700    1_
$a Zimmermann, Martin
700    1_
$a Reinhardt, Dirk
773    0_
$t Journal of Clinical Oncology $g Roč. 24, č. 22 (2006), s. 3686-3692 $p J Clin Oncol $x 0732-183X $w MED00002596
773    0_
$p J Clin Oncol $g 24(22):3686-92, 2006 Aug 1
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1556 $y 3 $z 0
990    __
$a 20131009132258 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190104125449 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 996863 $s 831163
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2006 $b 24 $c 22 $d 3686-3692 $i 0732-183X $m Journal of clinical oncology $x MED00002596 $n J. clin. Oncol.
GRA    __
$a NR8269 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a 2013-10/dpbo

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...