-
Something wrong with this record ?
Significance of resection margin as a risk factor for local control of early stage breast cancer
J. Gatek, D. Vrana, L. Lukesova, M. Pospiskova, P. Vazan, B. Melichar
Language English Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2001
Free Medical Journals
from 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2001
PubMed
24042334
DOI
10.5507/bp.2013.067
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant MeSH
- Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local radiotherapy MeSH
- Neoplasm Metastasis MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms pathology radiotherapy surgery MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Mastectomy, Segmental methods MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Breast conserving surgery combined with sentinel node biopsy represents currently the gold standard of treatment for early breast cancer. Although breast conserving surgery has been a widely accepted method for many years, there remain some highly controversial unresolved issues. The present analysis focused on the resection margin as one of the key factors for local control of the disease. METHODS: Patient disease free survival and overall survival were collected from patients undergoing breast conserving surgery from 2004 to 2009 at the Department of Surgery Atlas hospital Zlin, Czech Republic. All patients with resection margin less then 5 mm were re-resected to achieve this clear resection margin of 5mm or more. Disease free survival (more specifically local relapse free survival, metastasis free survival and regional free survival) and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: The data on 330 patients were analyzed and 286/330 cases had complete follow-up. After a median follow-up of 70 months, 7 patients with isolated local relapse were identified (2.44%), 13 patients with distant metastasis without local relapse (4.54%) and 2 patients with relapse in the axilla without local relapse in the breast (0.7%). CONCLUSION: The final decision about the extent of resection margin remains controversial but based on the data on local control presented here it seems reasonable to increase the criteria for a clear resection margin to 5 mm.
Cytologic and Histopathologic Laboratory Zlin
Department of Oncology Bata Hospital Zlin Zlin
Department of Oncology Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc
Department of Surgery Atlas Hospital Tomas Bata University in Zlin Zlin
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14049947
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140328105930.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140325s2013 xr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2013.067 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24042334
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Gatěk, Jiří, $d 1950- $7 xx0052958 $u Department of Surgery, Atlas Hospital, Tomas Bata University in Zlin, Zlin
- 245 10
- $a Significance of resection margin as a risk factor for local control of early stage breast cancer / $c J. Gatek, D. Vrana, L. Lukesova, M. Pospiskova, P. Vazan, B. Melichar
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Breast conserving surgery combined with sentinel node biopsy represents currently the gold standard of treatment for early breast cancer. Although breast conserving surgery has been a widely accepted method for many years, there remain some highly controversial unresolved issues. The present analysis focused on the resection margin as one of the key factors for local control of the disease. METHODS: Patient disease free survival and overall survival were collected from patients undergoing breast conserving surgery from 2004 to 2009 at the Department of Surgery Atlas hospital Zlin, Czech Republic. All patients with resection margin less then 5 mm were re-resected to achieve this clear resection margin of 5mm or more. Disease free survival (more specifically local relapse free survival, metastasis free survival and regional free survival) and overall survival were assessed. RESULTS: The data on 330 patients were analyzed and 286/330 cases had complete follow-up. After a median follow-up of 70 months, 7 patients with isolated local relapse were identified (2.44%), 13 patients with distant metastasis without local relapse (4.54%) and 2 patients with relapse in the axilla without local relapse in the breast (0.7%). CONCLUSION: The final decision about the extent of resection margin remains controversial but based on the data on local control presented here it seems reasonable to increase the criteria for a clear resection margin to 5 mm.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prsu $x patologie $x radioterapie $x chirurgie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a segmentální mastektomie $x metody $7 D015412
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a metastázy nádorů $7 D009362
- 650 _2
- $a lokální recidiva nádoru $x radioterapie $7 D009364
- 650 _2
- $a adjuvantní radioterapie $7 D018714
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie sentinelové lymfatické uzliny $7 D021701
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Vrána, David $7 xx0103187
- 700 1_
- $a Lukešová, Lucie $u Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc $7 xx0234590
- 700 1_
- $a Pospíšková, Markéta $u Department of Oncology, Bata Hospital Zlin, Zlin $7 xx0229118
- 700 1_
- $a Vážan, Petr $u Cytologic and Histopathologic Laboratory, Zlin $7 xx0143266
- 700 1_
- $a Melichar, Bohuslav, $u Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc $d 1965- $7 skuk0000853
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 157, č. 3 (2013), s. 209-213
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140325 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140327094704 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1017419 $s 848517
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 157 $c 3 $d 209-213 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK111 $a Pubmed-20140325