• Something wrong with this record ?

Integration of genetic risk factors into a clinical algorithm for multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a weighted genetic risk score

Jager PL De, LB Chibnik, J Cui, J Reischl, S Lehr, KC Simon, C Aubin, D Bauer, JF Heubach, R Sandbrink, M Tyblova, P Lelkova, committee of the BENEFIT study Steering, committee of the BEYOND study Steering, committee of the LTF study Steering,...

. 2009 ; 8 (12) : 1111-1119.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
1A8713 MZ0 CEP Register

Digital library NLK
Full text - Část
Source

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2002-05-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-05-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2002-05-01 to 2 months ago
Psychology Database (ProQuest) from 2002-05-01 to 2 months ago

BACKGROUND: Prediction of susceptibility to multiple sclerosis (MS) might have important clinical applications, either as part of a diagnostic algorithm or as a means to identify high-risk individuals for prospective studies. We investigated the usefulness of an aggregate measure of risk of MS that is based on genetic susceptibility loci. We also assessed the added effect of environmental risk factors that are associated with susceptibility for MS. METHODS: We created a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) that includes 16 MS susceptibility loci. We tested our model with data from 2215 individuals with MS and 2189 controls (derivation samples), a validation set of 1340 individuals with MS and 1109 controls taken from several MS therapeutic trials (TT cohort), and a second validation set of 143 individuals with MS and 281 controls from the US Nurses' Health Studies I and II (NHS/NHS II), for whom we also have data on smoking and immune response to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). FINDINGS: Individuals with a wGRS that was more than 1.25 SD from the mean had a significantly higher odds of MS in all datasets. In the derivation sample, the mean (SD) wGRS was 3.5 (0.7) for individuals with MS and 3.0 (0.6) for controls (p<0.0001); in the TT validation sample, the mean wGRS was 3.4 (0.7) for individuals with MS versus 3.1 (0.7) for controls (p<0.0001); and in the NHS/NHS II dataset, the mean wGRS was 3.4 (0.8) for individuals with MS versus 3.0 (0.7) for controls (p<0.0001). In the derivation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (C statistic; a measure of the ability of a model to discriminate between individuals with MS and controls) for the genetic-only model was 0.70 and for the genetics plus sex model was 0.74 (p<0.0001). In the TT and NHS cohorts, the C statistics for the genetic-only model were both 0.64; adding sex to the TT model increased the C statistic to 0.72 (p<0.0001), whereas adding smoking and immune response to EBV to the NHS model increased the C statistic to 0.68 (p=0.02). However, the wGRS does not seem to be correlated with the conversion of clinically isolated syndrome to MS. INTERPRETATION: The inclusion of 16 susceptibility alleles into a wGRS can modestly predict MS risk, shows consistent discriminatory ability in independent samples, and is enhanced by the inclusion of non-genetic risk factors into the algorithm. Future iterations of the wGRS might therefore make a contribution to algorithms that can predict a diagnosis of MS in a clinical or research setting.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14049985
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140401102056.0
007      
ta
008      
140325s2009 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
035    __
$a (PubMed)19879194
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a De Jager, Philip L. $u Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. pdejager@rics.bwh.harvard.edu
245    10
$a Integration of genetic risk factors into a clinical algorithm for multiple sclerosis susceptibility: a weighted genetic risk score / $c Jager PL De, LB Chibnik, J Cui, J Reischl, S Lehr, KC Simon, C Aubin, D Bauer, JF Heubach, R Sandbrink, M Tyblova, P Lelkova, committee of the BENEFIT study Steering, committee of the BEYOND study Steering, committee of the LTF study Steering, committee of the CCR1 study Steering, E Havrdova, C Pohl, D Horakova, A Ascherio, DA Hafler, EW Karlson
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Prediction of susceptibility to multiple sclerosis (MS) might have important clinical applications, either as part of a diagnostic algorithm or as a means to identify high-risk individuals for prospective studies. We investigated the usefulness of an aggregate measure of risk of MS that is based on genetic susceptibility loci. We also assessed the added effect of environmental risk factors that are associated with susceptibility for MS. METHODS: We created a weighted genetic risk score (wGRS) that includes 16 MS susceptibility loci. We tested our model with data from 2215 individuals with MS and 2189 controls (derivation samples), a validation set of 1340 individuals with MS and 1109 controls taken from several MS therapeutic trials (TT cohort), and a second validation set of 143 individuals with MS and 281 controls from the US Nurses' Health Studies I and II (NHS/NHS II), for whom we also have data on smoking and immune response to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). FINDINGS: Individuals with a wGRS that was more than 1.25 SD from the mean had a significantly higher odds of MS in all datasets. In the derivation sample, the mean (SD) wGRS was 3.5 (0.7) for individuals with MS and 3.0 (0.6) for controls (p<0.0001); in the TT validation sample, the mean wGRS was 3.4 (0.7) for individuals with MS versus 3.1 (0.7) for controls (p<0.0001); and in the NHS/NHS II dataset, the mean wGRS was 3.4 (0.8) for individuals with MS versus 3.0 (0.7) for controls (p<0.0001). In the derivation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (C statistic; a measure of the ability of a model to discriminate between individuals with MS and controls) for the genetic-only model was 0.70 and for the genetics plus sex model was 0.74 (p<0.0001). In the TT and NHS cohorts, the C statistics for the genetic-only model were both 0.64; adding sex to the TT model increased the C statistic to 0.72 (p<0.0001), whereas adding smoking and immune response to EBV to the NHS model increased the C statistic to 0.68 (p=0.02). However, the wGRS does not seem to be correlated with the conversion of clinically isolated syndrome to MS. INTERPRETATION: The inclusion of 16 susceptibility alleles into a wGRS can modestly predict MS risk, shows consistent discriminatory ability in independent samples, and is enhanced by the inclusion of non-genetic risk factors into the algorithm. Future iterations of the wGRS might therefore make a contribution to algorithms that can predict a diagnosis of MS in a clinical or research setting.
536    __
$c Grant Number: T32 ES016645 (United States NIEHS NIH HHS)
536    __
$c Grant Number: T32 ES016645-01 (United States NIEHS NIH HHS)
536    __
$c Grant Number: T32 ES16645-01 (United States NIEHS NIH HHS)
590    __
$a bohemika - dle Pubmed
650    02
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    02
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    02
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a algoritmy $7 D000465
650    02
$a alely $7 D000483
650    02
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    02
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    02
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    02
$a životní prostředí $7 D004777
650    02
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    02
$a genotyp $7 D005838
650    02
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    02
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    02
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a roztroušená skleróza $x epidemiologie $x genetika $7 D009103
650    02
$a odds ratio $7 D016017
650    02
$a jednonukleotidový polymorfismus $x genetika $7 D020641
650    02
$a prediktivní hodnota testů $7 D011237
650    02
$a lokus kvantitativního znaku $7 D040641
650    02
$a hodnocení rizik $7 D018570
650    02
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
655    _2
$a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Chibnik, Lori B.
700    1_
$a Cui, Jing
700    1_
$a Reischl, Joachim
700    1_
$a Lehr, Stephan
700    1_
$a Simon, K Claire
700    1_
$a Aubin, Cristin $7 gn_A_00009905
700    1_
$a Bauer, David
700    1_
$a Heubach, Jurgen F.
700    1_
$a Sandbrink, Rupert
700    1_
$a Týblová, Michaela $7 xx0121850
700    1_
$a Lelková, Petra $7 xx0142909
700    1_
$a Kubala Havrdová, Eva, $d 1955- $7 nlk19990073204
700    1_
$a Pohl, Christoph
700    1_
$a Horáková, Dana $7 xx0076527
700    1_
$a Ascherio, Alberto $7 gn_A_00009361
700    1_
$a Hafler, David A.
700    1_
$a Karlson, Elizabeth W.
773    0_
$t The lancet neurology $g Roč. 8, č. 12 (2009), s. 1111-1119 $p Lancet neurol. $x 1474-4422 $w MED00006921
910    __
$a ABA008 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20140325144246 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140401102134 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1017109 $s 848556
BAS    __
$a 3
BMC    __
$a 2009 $b 8 $c 12 $d 1111-1119 $x MED00006921 $i 1474-4422 $m Lancet neurology $n Lancet Neurol
GRA    __
$a 1A8713 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a NLK 2014-03/lpbo

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...